Online:5 Years Ago Name:- Private -
Updated:8 Years Ago Gender:Male
Joined:13 Years Ago Birthday:- Private -
President:Not Saying Email:- Private -
Ideology:Libertarian Education:Graduate Degree
Party:Republican Party Ethnicity:White
Relationship:Married Income:$75,000 to $100,000
Interested:in Women Occupation:Sales
Looking:Friendship Religion:Christian
About Me:I am a George Fox University Biblical Studies / Writing and Literature graduate. I love discussing religion. I am a nondenominational protestant member (though I attend a Baptist Church). I have a Master of arts in Theological studies from George Fox University. I will be pursing doctoral work at Oxford.
Activities:Bowling, Martial Arts, Running, Soccer, Weight Lifting
Beliefs:I am a Christian Independent(however I am a registered republican) who strongly disagrees with far left policies. I prefer debating religious topics considering that is the focus of my studies. I am a reformed Arminian who disagrees with every letter in TULIP. I do not believe in inerrancy of scripture but rather infallibility. Jesus is the Son of God, who truly died and was truly raised. I believe in the Trinity and that Hell is eternal.
Quotes:"What we do in this life, echoes in eternity" - Gladiator
George Fox University, Undergraduate Class of 2005
Newberg, Oregon, United States
High School:
Sherwood High School, Class of 2005
Sherwood, Oregon, United States

Secular morality is superior to religious morality


I could mention many of the atrocities committed in the name of religion historically, but I find this to be an argument that doesn't work very well. If you look at the last century or so, the biggest component of global violence is state violence, and its motives are largely political. Trying to lay this violence at the feet of religion (or secularism for that matter) is a contrived exercise in guilt by association. So I'd like to approach this subject in a different way: by trying to determ...

Post Voting Period
Updated 8 Years Ago

There is a rational basis to deny fertile, young women employment


Topic: There is a rational basis to deny fertile, young women employmentWhat is up for debate here is relatively easy to understand and is motivated by a blog post I read recently. I intend to argue that employers have a strong, rational basis to deny women of childbearing age from employment.Definitions: Rational - Based on or in accordance with reason or logic.Fertile - Bearing or capable of bearing offspring.Young - Ages 20-29Rules:(1) First round is for acceptance.(2) No new arguments...

Post Voting Period
Updated 8 Years Ago

Homosexual men should be allowed to donate blood


Round 1-Opening Arguments Round 2-Rebuttal Round 3-Rebuttal Round 4-Conclusive Statements Round 1-I do feel that homosexual men should be allowed to donate blood. The blood has to be screened so if there is something wrong with their blood it will not be used. So there really is no good reason to stop homosexual men from donating blood. I find the practice of denying someone blood based on an assumption of a willing donor to be foolish, especially when any skepticism can be easily proven....

Post Voting Period
Updated 8 Years Ago

If the B-Theory of time is true, then Christianity is implausible


This debate will not be a debate on whether B-Theory is true or not. This debate will be about whether or not Christianity would still be plausible if B-Theory is true. Basically, we essentially assume B-Theory is true, and argue based on that axiom whether or not Christianity would still have a reasonable chance of surviving based on this notion. I will also be taking on the burden of proof, meaning all Con has to do is sufficiently undermine my claims better than I substantiate them. Firs...

Post Voting Period
Updated 8 Years Ago

Brian Griffin is cognitively dissonant in regards to religion


Brian Griffin is a fictional character on the show Family Guy[1]. On the show he is known for being an atheist. I will argue that his being so contradicts past experiences of his over the show's course.===Rules===1. Drops will count as concessions.2. Semantic or abusive arguments will not be counted.3. New arguments brought in the last round will not be counted.4. R1 is for acceptance/clarification. Argumentation begins in R2.5. BoP is shared between Pro and Con.===Sources===[1] http://familyguy...

Post Voting Period
Updated 9 Years Ago
Win Ratio:90.91%
Elo Ranking:4,952
Forum Posts:723
Votes Cast:378
Opinion Arguments:1
Opinion Questions:0
Poll Votes:378
Poll Topics:0
1 Album
Me and my wife
Updated 8 Years Ago
Disagree: 0.00%
Agree: 0.00%
Affirmative ActionCon
Animal RightsCon
Barack ObamaCon
Border FencePro
Civil UnionsCon
Death PenaltyPro
Drug LegalizationPro
Electoral CollegeCon
Environmental ProtectionPro
Estate TaxCon
European UnionCon
Federal ReserveCon
Flat TaxPro
Free TradeCon
Gay MarriageCon
Global Warming ExistsCon
Gold StandardPro
Gun RightsPro
Internet CensorshipCon
Iran-Iraq WarCon
Labor UnionCon
Legalized ProstitutionPro
Medicaid & MedicareCon
Medical MarijuanaPro
Military InterventionCon
Minimum WageCon
National Health CareCon
National Retail Sales TaxCon
Occupy MovementPro
Progressive TaxCon
Racial ProfilingPro
Smoking BanCon
Social ProgramsCon
Social SecurityCon
Stimulus SpendingCon
Term LimitsPro
United NationsCon
War in AfghanistanCon
War on TerrorCon

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.