We are bringing ddo backPosted 2 years Ago

Badger my gallant Gaelic friend how I've pined for you no homo.
Forums Home > Debate.org

RlP DDOPosted 3 years Ago

At 8/5/2018 2:45:30 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 8/5/2018 2:38:30 AM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 8/5/2018 1:29:11 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 8/4/2018 5:34:15 PM, thett3 wrote:
smash that MFing F key lol

- HOLY SH*T!!!!! WHAT HAPPENED HERE????/

Hey boi, if you be Hussain Nizam Shah I, I'll be Diogo Rodrigues.

- Is he the one who wrote something about the history of India?

He crumbled on of the biggest Hindu empires by convincing Muslims on the Hindu side to switch sides in a crucial battle and behead the Emperor on the battlefield. Diogo Rodrigues famously destroyed Hindu idols and temples.
Forums Home > Debate.org

RlP DDOPosted 3 years Ago

At 8/5/2018 1:29:11 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 8/4/2018 5:34:15 PM, thett3 wrote:
smash that MFing F key lol

- HOLY SH*T!!!!! WHAT HAPPENED HERE????/

Hey boi, if you be Hussain Nizam Shah I, I'll be Diogo Rodrigues.
Forums Home > Debate.org

RlP DDOPosted 3 years Ago

At 8/5/2018 1:29:11 AM, Yassine wrote:
At 8/4/2018 5:34:15 PM, thett3 wrote:
smash that MFing F key lol

- HOLY SH*T!!!!! WHAT HAPPENED HERE????/

Satan himself has marshaled his horde of Hindu spiritists to destroy this burgeoning cradle of the ONE, HOLY, APOSTOLIC CHURCH.
Forums Home > Debate.org

RlP DDOPosted 3 years Ago

Debate Island is for gypsy incels. Real chads use Civid.
Forums Home > Debate.org

Single mothersPosted 3 years Ago

At 7/30/2018 4:55:12 PM, zmikecuber wrote:
https://youtu.be...

Discuss.

Good ole Annie really hits it out of the park with this one. The whole societal conception of marriage has been turned on its head. Instead of being oriented towards the creation and nurturing of new life it is being swallowed up by an individualist, solipsistic utility calculus. The family is subordinated to the individual, policy and law subordinated to this new individual-orientated 'family'.
Forums Home > Politics

GOP is no longer a conservative partyPosted 3 years Ago

At 7/26/2018 2:21:31 AM, triangle.128k wrote:
At 7/26/2018 2:08:15 AM, Skepsikyma wrote:
I personally think that this isn't nearly 'conservative' enough and that we should resurrect mercantilism

I surely can't wait to shoot down British merchant ships in the Indian Ocean and then proceed to buckaneer the Carribean islands.

Ah friend, take the KAGA hat off your head and feel the salt breeze rifle your hair as the HMS Queen Abdullah I sinks beneath the sapphire waves. Just another day in the glorious year 2048, when hard man ply the waves of the South American Sea under the steely auspice of Lord Protector Barron Trump.
Forums Home > Politics

GOP is no longer a conservative partyPosted 3 years Ago

At 7/26/2018 12:04:11 AM, Brendan21 wrote:
Anyone that is apart of the GOP and is not rioting in the streets about Trump's aid to farmers, or another way to put it, welfare is not a conservative. Any real conservative knows that this move goes against everything that conservationism stands for, and is against Free-Trade and Laissez-faire mentally of no government in free enterprise. GOP in America has flipped on it's heels at the whim of one man, and the sheep follow him away from their own principles, which clearly they never really held.

Considering that blind loyalty to 'laissez-faire' on principle is less than a century old, there is little that is 'conservative' about it. In reality, Trump is taking America back to its roots of protectionist industrialism, while autistic numbercrunchers screech impotently about it in the corner. I personally think that this isn't nearly 'conservative' enough and that we should resurrect mercantilism and then feudalism, but baby steps, baby steps.
Forums Home > Politics

DDO Burger King--THE EXCITING CONCLUSIONPosted 3 years Ago

f
Forums Home > Politics

Farmland Racial tensionsPosted 3 years Ago

At 7/21/2018 6:44:02 PM, Bennett91 wrote:
At 7/21/2018 9:26:35 AM, Skepsikyma wrote:
At 7/21/2018 7:41:47 AM, Bennett91 wrote:
At 7/20/2018 2:45:11 AM, Nd2400 wrote:
I guess, no one gives a crap about what is happening in South Africa....

No one gives a crap because it's propaganda. Of course blacks want to confiscate farmland - the apartheid government gave the best farmland to the whites while forcing the rest of the population into reservations.

What a laughably bad take. What we know is that the Khoisan populations which once populated all of South Africa are today found only in a small area, and that there are small amounts of Khoisan DNA mixed with the Bantu tribes. Here's the kicker, though: those same mitochondrial DNA lines found mixed into the Bantu gene pool are completely extinct among the surviving Khoisan. This points to a rather disturbing historical event: the marriage of Khoisan woman to Bantu men coupled with the extinction of Khoisan pairs in the intermixed area. A pattern typical of invaders who kill off the men and then marry the women. To say that this means that the Khoisan weren't replaced is analogous to saying that the Trail of Tears would have been completely fine and non-oppressive if the settlers had only driven off the or killed the men from the most fertile land while rape-marrying a sufficient amount of native women.

Or you know, maybe the more technologically advanced Bantu moved in, the Khoisan men said 'here, take our women and best grazing land', politely moved to the arid outskirts of their formerly expansive territories and then remained celibate until their deaths.

I'm not pretending there was no violence, but your description of rape and genocide doesn't make sense either. I couldn't find any source that concluded that wiping out the men and raping the women can be seen through DNA.

https://phys.org...

Mitochondrial DNA is passed only from mother to child, because the sperm cell doesn't have a mitochondria, only the egg does. These particular Mitochondrial genetic groups are used as evidence for interbreeding, but they are only found among the Bantu, not among the Khoisan. The only way that this would happen is if the Khoisan woman all married Bantu men. In the period following the invasion of the Bantu and the mass exodus of the Khoisan, that paints a pretty bleak picture.

"Eventually, so the reasoning went, the isolated people would fall on hard times and enter the clientage system and the communities of Bantu-speaking people. Indeed this entry to clientage did happen, even if it didn't involve intermarriage. There is some evidence, per George Stow and others, of some Khoesan hunters surviving between the clustered villages of homesteads on the Eastern Cape as well into the late 19th century--which would have extinguished their spaces because of compression in the face of colonial dispossession. Those things suggest strongly that this was not a displacing or dispossessing process, and southern Africa certainly had enough land for people to move. Khoesan-speakers, whether hunters or herders, had toolkits that were suited to the eastern half of the subcontinent, so they still monopolized it when Europeans set up shop at the Cape." https://www.reddit.com...

By this logic the Dutch were equally justified, as Khoisan often worked for them on their farms once their traditional way of life was no longer viable because the Dutch turned their grazing lands into farms, exactly as the Bantu did earlier. The fact of the matter is that the Bantu speaking people were more culturally advanced than the Khoisan, and the Dutch more so than both. That doesn't justify what either side did on a moral level.

And it makes little sense to even try to point out the foreign and violent origins of the Bantu while opining for the Dutch conquest/apartheid holdings as something that should be preserved. At worst, both were foreign conquerors, both have the same claim on the land through 'legitimacy by conquest'.

That's exactly my point. They're both now there, they both need to live together. Colonializism was a bad thing in both cases. The idea that the Bantu are the 'real' owners of the land, and are therefore acting in pursuit of 'justice' when they drown twelve year old boys in boiling water is absurd: they're looking to advance their tribal interest and are willing to be brutally violent to do it. The Khoisan alone can claim that they are taking back 'their land'.
Forums Home > Politics

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.