Sui_Generis

31-year old male in Warsaw, Indiana, United States.

Online:	3 Years Ago	Name:	- Private -
Updated:	4 Years Ago	Gender:	Male
Joined:	9 Years Ago	Birthday:	- Private -
President:	Ron Paul (Republican Party)	Email:	- Private -
Ideology:	Libertarian	Education:	Associates Degree
Party:	Independent	Ethnicity:	White
Relationship:	Single	Income:	Other
Interested:	in Women	Occupation:	Technical
Looking:	Friendship, Networking	Religion:	Christian - Presbytarian

About Me:	My name is not Sui_Genesis. I probably would accept a hug.
Activities:	holding it together.
Beliefs:	I believe in Harvey Dent.
Books:	basically illiterate.
Movies:	I have two favorite genres. cerebral/psychological suspense/thriller/mystery (highlights: Memento / The Machinist), and emotional drama with dashes of comedy/romance (highlights: 50/50 / Love & Other Drugs). I also like indie and arthouse films, sometimes. Primer, Melancholia.
Music:	something edgy.
Quotes:	That's a personal question.
Sports Teams:	boring
TV Shows:	boring question.

College:	Waubonsee Community College, Undergraduate Class of 2011 Sugar Grove, Illinois, United States

9 Debates

BOY GIRL WHO TELL ME THIS HUh??

BOY GlRL WHO TELL ME THIS HUH??...

Debating Period

11 Comments

Updated 4 Years Ago

Rap Battle Tournament

Round 1 is for acceptance only....

Debating Period

9 Comments

Updated 5 Years Ago

If you're a man can you rape another man and say "no homo" to make it not gay???

Well if you're a guy and you have sex with another guy and say "NO HOMO" It's not gay because of that statement. The phrase "no homo" literally means that whatever it's being applied to in that context is not homosexual, or gay. I'm interested to see what con brings up....

Debating Period

4 Comments

Updated 5 Years Ago

Religious debate tourney - The Easter Bunny is superior to Jesus.

Round 1 for acceptance. Prove your argument by citing any evidence you feel would hold in a public forum, no other restrictions....

Post Voting Period

8 Comments

Updated 9 Years Ago

Arguments on the Framework of Morality: A discussion on if we need God to define good & evil.

Arguments on the Framework of Morality: A discussion on if we need God to define good & evil. This will be a debate/ discussion on the necessity of God in the context of morality. Do we need God to know good and bad, good and evil, righteousness and injustice? My Stance: God is unnecessary in all matters of morality & relating to good/evil. These can be defined and explained via logic, reason and science. Definitions: Morality: referring to some codes of conduct put forward by a soc...

Post Voting Period

13 Comments

Updated 9 Years Ago

Post a comment to Sui_Generis' profile.

Add as a Friend

Add to My Favorites

Block this Person

Challenge to a Debate

Report this Profile

Send a Message

Share with My Friends

Debate Statistics
Debates:	6
Lost:	1
Tied:	1
Won:	4
Win Ratio:	80.00%
Percentile:	95.33%
Elo Ranking:	2,228
Statistics based on completed debates.

Activity Statistics
Forum Posts:	4650
Votes Cast:	6
Opinion Arguments:	3
Opinion Questions:	0
Poll Votes:	7
Poll Topics:	0

65 Friends

SupaDudz	bsh1	bsh7000
FREEDO	Cat47	Hayd

1 Album

Debate.org

Updated 4 Years Ago

The BIG Issues
This list identifies where Sui_Generis stands on popular issues. The choices are limited to the following:

N/O - No Opinion
N/S - Not Saying
Und - Undecided
Con - Against
Pro - In Favor

If you are logged in, you will also see green or red bullets next to each issue, which indicate whether you agree or disagree with Sui_Generis on that particular issue.

You can also click each issue to find other members that agree with Sui_Generis' position on the issue.

Disagree: 0.00%

Agree: 0.00%
•	Abortion	ConComments homo sapiens are human people from conception. it is also never morally justifiable to kill an unborn human except in cases where failing to do so seriously threatens the mothers' life.
•	Affirmative Action	ConComments I oppose affirmative actions, because I believe it is the right of the individual to refuse service, favors, employment, etc., to whomever he pleases based on any criteria he pleases.
•	Animal Rights	UndComments Against animal cruelty.
•	Barack Obama	ConComments Little of his decisions agree with my convictions.
•	Border Fence	ConComments was leaning con, now completely con. enormous waste of money and complete waste of time.
•	Capitalism	ProComments I advocate the Austrian school of economics.
•	Civil Unions	ProComments It is the right of any two individuals capable of consent to enter into any contract they so desire.
•	Death Penalty	ProComments Swift and consistent use of the death penalty is an effective deterrent to crime. I oppose its current implementation due to the too-high error rate.
•	Drug Legalization	ProComments Drug legalization can be in three states: effectively prohibited, ineffectively prohibited, and unprohibited. The tyrannical authority, force, and presence of government required for the first precludes that state. We currently have the second state in our country. The relatively small cost of drug use to individuals and marginally more legally-relevant cost to society, combined with the cost of black market drug dealer- and gang-violence illegalization creates, combined with how ultimately ineffective current practices are, does not warrant illegalization. Thus, drugs should, for the greater good, be legal.
•	Electoral College	UndComments Have not researched sufficiently.
•	Environmental Protection	ConComments In practice, Pro. As a precedent for institution of legal regulatory measures, Con.
•	Estate Tax	ConComments Sub-policy to the greater system of Austrian economics, principles of personal liberty, and the efficacy of the free market.
•	European Union	Con
•	Euthanasia	ConComments I don't include DNRs and taking someone off of life support as euthanasia. I think suicide is wrong, and should be illegal. In the same way, voluntary euthanasia as well as assisted suicide should be illegal.
•	Federal Reserve	Con
•	Flat Tax	Pro
•	Free Trade	Pro
•	Gay Marriage	Con
•	Global Warming Exists	UndComments Leaning Con-- Position stereotypically held by those who hold mostly opposing viewpoints. Such commonalities usually stem from common presuppositions; I disagree with many presuppositions held by ideological opponents, thus leaning con. I am open to argumentation.
•	Globalization	ConComments Benefits in some aspects is granted.
•	Gold Standard	ProComments Open to similarly-based alternatives.
•	Gun Rights	ProComments No restrictions.
•	Homeschooling	Pro
•	Internet Censorship	Con
•	Iran-Iraq War	Con
•	Labor Union	Con
•	Legalized Prostitution	Pro
•	Medicaid & Medicare	Con
•	Medical Marijuana	Pro
•	Military Intervention	Con
•	Minimum Wage	Con
•	National Health Care	Con
•	National Retail Sales Tax	Und
•	Occupy Movement	Con
•	Progressive Tax	Con
•	Racial Profiling	N/OComments To prohibit this is somewhat ridiculous. In the words of a police officer interviewed, "If I'm looking for a marijuana bust, I'm not checking out redheads in SoHo."
•	Redistribution	ConComments I assume this is referring to private wealth.
•	Smoking Ban	Con
•	Social Programs	Con
•	Social Security	Con
•	Socialism	Con
•	Stimulus Spending	Con
•	Term Limits	Pro
•	Torture	N/OComments As a tool of government.
•	United Nations	Con
•	War in Afghanistan	ConComments Pro for "IN Afghanistan, seeking retribution for 9/11 attacks." Con for "against [middle-eastern nation's name]."
•	War on Terror	ConComments A popular reason to meddle in other countries.
•	Welfare	Con