The Instigator
Speedrace
Pro (for)
The Contender
Chronosofwisdom
Con (against)

Books Are Better Than Movies

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Speedrace has forfeited round #4.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/31/2019 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 580 times Debate No: 121112
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (3)
Votes (0)

 

Speedrace

Pro

I will be arguing that books are better than movies. This is not in the sense that the ideas for books or plot lines are better than those in movies, But more about the rhetoric in each and how they evoke emotion.

This can be an acceptance round or you can start your argument, Your choice.

Have fun! :)
Chronosofwisdom

Con

Hello there.

I accept, You start first.
Debate Round No. 1
Speedrace

Pro

Books are better than movies firstly because they can be released much faster than movies. A book can be written in just months, While movies take years to finish, And even longer if they're animated. Second, Writing books cost much less than making movies, And there is a much bigger base for them because there are so many more. Third, Books use language that is just not possible in movies, and therefore have much more emotion in them. Finally, Books are almost always better than the movies. The Hunger Games is much better than the movies, As is The Chronicles of Narnia, The Giver, And pretty much every other one.
Chronosofwisdom

Con

Good argument!

Although books may cheaper than movies, There are a lot more bad books than bad movies. To explain this, Think of this: since books are cheaper to create, This will allow more bad writers to create multiple books, Thus leading to more bad books. Movies on the other hand, If the scriptwriter makes one awful movie, He is done. It motivates writers to make the best movies possible.
In one way for books the bar is set low, So the unskilled can jump it, While with movies the bar is high, So only the skilled can jump it.

Whenever you read a book, You have to imagine what is going on, The scenery, Characters, And all other aspects of the story. This could explain why the books are always better than their movie counterparts, Because when one person imagines it one way and makes a movie of it, Than all the other people who read the same book will say "I imagined it differently. " Thus causing confusion. While when movies are original, Its totally new and better described than any book could.
Debate Round No. 2
Speedrace

Pro

Yes, There may be more bad books and movies, But that is because there are many more writers than moviemakers! In fact, More good books are released per year than good movies.

Imagination is exercised by books, And it helps people to visualize better. It also allows you to put the face of whoever you want on a character, And so in some manners, It becomes molded around your own thoughts. Movies are constrained to one interpretation (besides conspiracy theories), But books can be flexible, Which is why they are much better for books talks and what not. This is a good thing because it leads to intellectual discussions that bring people together over a shared love of a topic.

Another thing is that if a book is bad, You can simply put it down and move on with your life. If you go to a theatre, And the movie is bad, You've wasted a lot of money and time on a terrible experience.
Chronosofwisdom

Con

20 bucks is not bad

Movies allow for relaxation, Not requiring you to put any effort in whatsoever. You don't have to imagine whats going on because you can see it.

As for quality control, This is only obtainable in movies, As the price gap nowadays filters out bad movies. And it's not just the price gap that acts as a filter, But series. People enjoy marvel movies because they are good movies. Most people don't go to see a movie that they have no background for, So most people don't end up seeing bad movies in the first place.

Good debate.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by anc2006 2 years ago
anc2006
fine sickintheheadz, Finally see you not raping girls
Posted by SickInTheHeadz 3 years ago
SickInTheHeadz
I prefer books for many reasons.
First, Movies only last for an hour or two, And most of the movies are bad, At least for me.
However, Books, I find fun. I don't read much. I only read 20-30 pages per day, I put a folded piece of paper to mark the point to where I arrived. I can continue reading any time I feel like it, And I can read as much as I like, And stop when I see that I start feeling discomfort.
This "casual" type of reading is pretty fun to combat boredom.
Posted by melcharaz 3 years ago
melcharaz
id argue it depends on the receptivity of a person. Many people like movies more because they often don't exercise imagination or are incapable of feeling things in a similar way through text.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.