The Instigator
Masterful
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
policy-debate
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

In general, SJWs are worthless and petty

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/18/2019 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 491 times Debate No: 123476
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (17)
Votes (0)

 

Masterful

Pro

Social justice warriors.
They're not physical, Literal warriors by the way, It's a lie like the justice part.
policy-debate

Con

"Social justice warriors", As you've termed them, Help to spread awareness and general non-violent activism. Martin Luther King was a "social justice warrior" so if you're calling him and others like him "worthless and petty", Then there are other issues at play.
Debate Round No. 1
Masterful

Pro

An introduction to the SJW cult.

The way of the SJW is one of self-entitlement, It is to believe you can preach to everyone about how virtuous and morally upstanding you are, While simultaneously separating people into categories of group identity. They put blacks, Gays and all minorities into one pocket and the majority (which is white people) into another pocket. The premise here is, White people are the oppressors with an unseeable and unprovable force known as ‘white privilege’. In the SJW mythos, White privilege acts as the Devil, Evil and oppressive it is the sole reason white people do so well and the reason minorities do not. It’s similar to the mystical force known as the patriarchy.

Of course, Whether white privilege exists is like arguing whether God exists. The burden of proof has not even been met, Yet the SJWs act as though their assertion is a common truth. You must believe in the patriarchy and white privilege if you wish to become an SJW.

What is an SJW?
Most people by now know that when someone is accused of being a social justice warrior, It is probably not a compliment. They have a reputation for being outraged at petty things, Mainly on behalf of other people, It’s a sudo-compassionate ideology.

The ideology of the SJW is one of social equality, It advocates equality BY ALL MEANS. This does not mean ‘everyone gets a fair shot at achieving’ no, No, No, Do not be fooled by that, We all want a fair shot. The SJW wants equality of outcome by sub categorizing all humans based on race, Gender and sexual orientation. The idea is then to have an equal number of sub categories represented throughout the western world, Be it in movies, Jobs or universities.

Not enough black people in a movie? RACIST.

Not enough trans people passing an interview? TRANSPHOBIC.

The very ideology is the essence of bigotry, Bullying and bizarre buzzwords used against anyone that dares speak out against them. It is by its very nature, An anti-debate, Anti-free speech and in turn, An authoritarian ideology disguised as compassion and virtue. You might call it, ‘The Devil in disguise’

In short, What an SJW represents is: “You’re either with us or you’re a transphobic bigot. ”

A self-proclaimed warrior of social justice.

Are they real physical warriors? Very obviously not.

If their claim that they are warriors is a lie, What does this say about them claiming to be proponents of justice?

Social justice warriors bully, Harass and attack their victims via social media where they will slander, Pander and whine about how “manspreading is a form of oppression and a sign of the patriarchy” and how you need to “check your white privilege”

Who gets to claim they’re a proponent of justice while forgoing due process and inciting trial by lynch mob? Those petty and worthless enough to do so, Of course.

Why would anyone want to become an SJW?

The answer is simple; many people are naive enough to allow themselves to be fooled by ideologies that claim. Some ideologies claim God is real or that Jews are evil, While others claim they’re compassionate. How did people ever follow Hitler? Because of propaganda that appealed to ones emotions, They also created a scape goat: The Jews. The claim was, ‘Jews are evil’.

In the case of the SJW, The scapegoat is white males, ‘white males are evil’. The SJWs claim to be the most compassionate (emotional) people. This is their biggest weakness, This leads them to believing the silly things that they do and is why they are easily emotionally manipulated.


If we cannot describe this child-like behavior as worthless and petty, I ask, What may we desribe it as?

I bid you good day.

policy-debate

Con

First of all, SJWs simply want equal protection for all. If you're honestly arguing that white privilege doesn't exist, There're separate issues. White privilege is in no way comparable to the Christian God. How many white presidents have we had?

SJWs literally just want the world to be equitable for all groups.
Debate Round No. 2
17 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by WhoPutYouOnThePlanet 2 years ago
WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
@Anonymous03

I also disagree with you, There are many studies that show that children who grow up without male role models are more prone to bad behavior and insufficient empathy, So the feminist movement was bad or at the very least misplaced from the start, Secondly its clearly more then one or two individuals promoting this anti-male agenda, If it wasent this wouldn't be as big of a problem as it now is, Thirdly if feminists really did care about equality, They wouldn't be talking about the wage gap, They wouldn't be blaming a non-existent patriarchy, They would be fighting for equality in the third world rather then the first world where they have more rights then men, And they wouldn't even call themselves feminists in the first place.

You can't just assert a divide between the extremism as a excuse to mask the truth of what feminism really is and what its promoting, Which is gender inequality and non-equal rights.
Posted by Masterful 2 years ago
Masterful
Male feminists are just in it for the pussay.
Posted by Anonymous03 2 years ago
Anonymous03
@WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
I disagree. Modern feminists are still advocating for what they used to. As I said before, It's one or two famous influencers pushing the anti-male agenda that gives a bad name for feminists.

Oh, Just a side note: male feminists are almost 99% white-knighting cucks.
Posted by WhoPutYouOnThePlanet 2 years ago
WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
@policy-debate

I stated things how they are, You didn't like that so you called me condescending, To me this shows that your arguments are based less in actual fact and more in emotional fallacy's, For example. .

"yep :) no need to be salty because women want equal protection"
"Also, Good job trying to come off as condescending, I'm still a male feminist though :)"
"with more CEOs named "David" than there are female CEOs. "
"patriarchal advancement of men over women speaks louder than the words of 'women and men are already equal. ' Because I can tell you, They aren't. "
Posted by WhoPutYouOnThePlanet 2 years ago
WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
@policy-debate

The existing wage gap has nothing to do with the non-existent patriarchy, Instead it has to do with the following.

*Men tend to work more hours then women do on average.
*Men tend to work more dangerous jobs then women "which is why men make up most workplace fatality's".
*Men are more likely to ask for raises then women.
*Men are more likely to come to work sick them women
*Men tend to retire later then women.

When this and others are taken into account, The wage gap makes perfect sense, However this poses a problem for the feminist movement because even though the before mentioned reasons are supported by vindicated statistics, If feminists admitted that, Then it would mean the problem would be themselves rather then just blaming something or someone else for their actions, And if there is one thing humanity sucks at, Its accepting personal responsibility. I remember cornering a feminist in another debate about this once where they decided to suddenly shift the goal post to women being forced into lower paying jobs by societal influences which is completely absurd and again a lack of accepting personal responsibility.

Women have less severe punishments for equal crimes, Courts almost always side with women in divorces for custody of children, Women can sue sperm donors for child support, Women can claim someone else is the father of their child and if the man doesn't pay for a genetics test he is held accountable even if the child is not his, There are support groups in place for women, Where as there are none for men "we tried to make one once, But feminists shut it down claiming white supremacy. . ", Women can ruin a mans life with a mere accusation of rape and get away Scott free which isn't vice versa. So please do go on about how women don't have equal pay and protection, Because i can argue that not only do they have it, They have more then men.

I don't care if your a male or a feminist, It doesn't make anything you say more va
Posted by Anonymous03 2 years ago
Anonymous03
SJW's have good intentions. However one or two of them that are weird give everyone else a bad name.
Posted by Masterful 2 years ago
Masterful
I'm sure you don't even know what the pay gap means.
What do you want to do, Fire all the Davids and replace them with women?
Do you realise how sexist that is. He has a dick and balls, Therefore he's not allowed to be a CEO because not enough women are competing at CEO level.
Posted by policy-debate 2 years ago
policy-debate
@WhoPutYouOnThePlanet

Women absolutely don't have equal pay or protection. The wage gap in the United States is still ENORMOUS with more CEOs named "David" than there are female CEOs. The modern feminist movement simply advocates for the cessation of misogyny, Not to be conflated with the advancement of misandry, Which I agree is wrong. I agree, Actions do speak louder than words. And the action of the constant and systematic patriarchal advancement of men over women speaks louder than the words of 'women and men are already equal. ' Because I can tell you, They aren't.

Also, Good job trying to come off as condescending, I'm still a male feminist though :)
Posted by WhoPutYouOnThePlanet 2 years ago
WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
"yep :) no need to be salty because women want equal protection"

Women already have equal protection and equal pay. The modern feminist movement promotes a anti-male agenda and actively fights against fathers rights, Freedom of speech and social equality with the use of misinformation by claiming oppression to a non-existent patriarchy. And before you bother pasting the dictionary definition of feminism here as a cop-out, Actions speak louder then words, And holy crap are these actions clear.

Your attempt at trying to straw-man me is adorable though :)
Posted by policy-debate 2 years ago
policy-debate
@WhoPutYouOnThePlanet
yep :) no need to be salty because women want equal protection
No votes have been placed for this debate.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.