Debate.org is closing and the website will be taken offline on May 30, 2022.
Members can download their content by using the Download Data button in My Account. For more information, please refer to our FAQs page.
The Instigator
Con (against)
Anonymous
The Contender
SevenQueens
Pro (for)

Is Polictical Correctness Good or Bad?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
SevenQueens has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/29/2019 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 357 times Debate No: 121096
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

Con

PC - Political Correctness
Political Correctness has split America apart and limited are freedom of speech. Society is telling us what to say and what to do. Let's say I wanted to say something a group of people would find offensive but I do not care what happens, I would be hated on from everyone who believes in PC. I would like for everyone to be equal, Not to be treated differently in any way, This means making sure someone doesn't get offended by my opinion, Is protecting them because they feel offended by it. If I felt offended by something I wouldn't want someone to defend me and attack the person who indirectly hurt the offended person. It is not society's job to protect you when someone says something you don't like, It's your own.
SevenQueens

Pro

I will counter this argument by stating that freedom of speech protects individuals from your speech being limited by the government by way of laws. Free speech does not protect an individual from criticism. Society telling us what to say and what to do isn"t a law or hard and fast rule suggesting that you physically cannot say certain things, It is more of a guideline suggesting what types of content society may find inflammatory.

A person"s ability to criticize someone on a public forum is itself a manifestation of free speech. In order for everyone to be equal as you say, The people offended by a post must be just as empowered to voice their opinions as the author of the original content was empowered to write it. Any author of "offensive" content shouldn"t be protected from criticism, Regardless of who would or would not find it offensive.
Debate Round No. 1

Con

What I'm trying to say is that society shouldn't try to create their own rules for what people can say. I can get hated down upon just because of something I said just because it's against the rules of PC. PC causes hate toward certain groups of people just because they aren't a minority. Just because I'm a straight white male, I'm hated on and not listened to. While a black woman could be praised for saying the same thing. It's like reverse racism. Isn't PC supposed to prevent inequality? Not shift the blame onto the non-minority?
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.