The Instigator
backwardseden
Pro (for)
The Contender
Challenge Period
Open Debate

No idiot god if true would ever use text, Namely the bible as a form of communication, Advertisement

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Challenge Expired
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Challenge Expires In
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/22/2020 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Challenge Period
Viewed: 278 times Debate No: 124101
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (15)
Votes (0)

 

backwardseden

Pro

No idiot god if true would never, Not for any reason, Use text as a form of communication, Advertisement, Correspondence, The absolute worst form of communication, Advertisement, Correspondence possible to a god if true.

There are at least 50 reasons for this. Let's see if you can think of 3 per RD.
(btw, Atheists have no problem with this)

Here are 3 simple ones and for this christianity will be used since it is the one I am most familiar with and clearly the evilest of all religions by far.
1. There are at least 1, 000 supermassive hypocritical contradictions and inconsistencies in the bible thus making it unreadable.
2. There's no original. Everything that is being read is a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy etc etc etc. So nobody interprets correctly. No-bo-dy. Suppose there is an original? Who is going to interpret from it so that every single person, Every single man, Woman and child gets the exact same message? AND who's to say that the interpreter is interpreting correctly?
3. Update errors. Language changes over time. It is inevitable. So who is going to keep on updating the bible as time wears on oh say 300 years from now AND deliver the same messages that there are from today's interpreters which is a 100% impossibility? Even as in the past, The KJV and the NLT that millions read on a daily basis deliver completely different messages. Here's an example. . .
In Isaiah 45:7 KJV "I form the light, And create darkness: I make peace, And create evil: I the Lord do all these things. " In the NIV version, Its "I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, The Lord, Do all these things. " In the NLT its "I create the light and make the darkness. I send good times and bad times. I, The Lord, Am the one who does these things. The words "evil" and "disaster" and "bad" are 3 completely different words that have 0% of nothing to do with each other and completely change the meaning of the verses. With each different verse, The messages are completely different. The synonyms of each word don"t even match.
Now which version is correct if any that millions are reading? And doesn"t any thinking moron not know that no god would allow this kind of crap to not allow any kind of passing the grade and thus no true god, Not for any reason among many reasons, Would never even contemplate using text as a form of communication, Advertisement, Correspondence TO ANY GOD?

Dsjpk5 is disqualified from the voting procedures as he tries to pretend he's god and thus change the voting structure of who wins and loses here on DDO.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
15 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Turk082 1 year ago
Turk082
@backwardseden

Also, Star Wars did not rip off the hidden Fortress but Star Crash. Sure, Star Crash came out a year after Star Wars but the dictator insists that it was written and the whole design of the film was made before Star Wars. . . . So that"s gotta be true. . . . Because he said it.

Any similarities that you see are either coincidental or just prove that Star Wars ripped off from Star Crash.

I know George Lucas always said he was always inspired by the sci-fi serials of Flash Gordon and the Hidden Fortress. Lies. All lies. That"s all garbage. Actually, It's the other way around. Star Wars, If anything ripped off from Star Crash, Not the Hidden Fortress. After you watch Star Crash, All your Star Wars collection will be just shelves and shelves of lies. It's pretty clear to me that he heard about Star Crash, And somehow got a hold of the script and the storyboards and all the production design and said, "well I"m just going to rip this off and become a billionaire. " And that is what he did. And look where he is today and where are the people that made Star Crash. It's pretty clear to me that Star Wars is just a giant plagiarism from Star Crash.
Posted by Turk082 1 year ago
Turk082
@backwardseden

I am convinced that G-d formed the world out of pre-existing matter, Placed in it the laws of nature and no longer interferes with human affairs. G-d is transcendental, Meaning that G-d has no body and is one.

Thus, These philosophers felt that G-d formed the universe, Placed in it the laws of nature, Is now transcendent, Does not communicate with prophets or interfere with nature by performing miracles, Then it follows that, Unless G-d somehow deviated from this norm, G-d did not communicate religious text or books, Or what have you.
Posted by backwardseden 1 year ago
backwardseden
@mall - "Do you think an almighty being is limited by what can be done to writings? " Irrelevant. Has nothing to do with anything. A true god would not use faith either. What is wrong with you? Are you so unable to figure these things out whereas atheists can? Its---not---that---hard. Regardless, YOU cannot even pay attention to you god damned bible AT ALL. Its not even a close call. NO ONE can. NO ONE is a christian. Yeah is it any blunder why there's over 33, 480 blubbering denominations of christianity alone? There's---no---consensus.
Try selling "A scripture that states faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God. The word is for those with faith, Trust and believe in the writings. No matter what is done, That message is coming through one way or another. " to 20 different churches within a 20 mile radius and see how many different answers you get. You think you are so pulverizing smart. But you are really not. A true god would see right through the fatalities of text, And never use it.
Posted by backwardseden 1 year ago
backwardseden
@alexisfaux - No actually I have singled out both your bible AND your unproven storybook character god of print only. Oh and yeah. Duh. I've run this debate a good 30 times. It's one of the biggest flaws as to why your unproven storybook character god of print only CANNOT POSSIBLY EXIST and as to why the bumbling babbling baby brained bible is just a book of belief. But see, You believe whatever YOU want. As f--king stated before, Yet again because YOU CAN'T READ because YOUR education and intelligence level is substandard. Just as it should be.
Posted by mall 1 year ago
mall
Do you think an almighty being is limited by what can be done to writings? A scripture that states faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God. The word is for those with faith, Trust and believe in the writings. No matter what is done, That message is coming through one way or another.
Posted by fauxlaw 1 year ago
fauxlaw
@backwardseden
No, In this debate, You have not singled out the Bible, But in another debate between us, You have, And, As here, Derogatorily so without purpose. I'd suggest you stop stroking your brainstem with adjectives and just speak to the noun.
Posted by backwardseden 1 year ago
backwardseden
@Turk082 - Yeah as always you are THIS STUPID. Pay attention to your last moronic idiotic post as you thus prove 100% of yourself to be an atheist. Case closed. I will not pay any attention anymore to what you have to say, At all not ever. You are far too stupid and ignorant for my brackets. "For G-d does not speak to prophets nor communicates with anyone. " Since this is true, And it is, Since no one has ever in this history of the human race has ever proven a god with any evidence to thus prove that a god exists, Which you have just stated according to you, Atheism rings as truth. Bye.
Posted by Turk082 1 year ago
Turk082
But I do agree that G-d never used text. For G-d does not speak to prophets nor communicates with anyone. It follows that G-d spoke to no one. Thus, G-d did not reveal text.
Posted by Turk082 1 year ago
Turk082
I really do hate to say this to our atheist friends, But according to the smartest man in the world, Chris Langan, G-d exists. And Langan particularly likes the Bible. Like it or not, There are wise men who say that G-d exists.

Thus, Albert Einstein said: "I believe in Spinoza"s G-d who reveals Himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, Not in a G-d who concerns Himself with fates and actions of human beings. "
Posted by Turk082 1 year ago
Turk082
I really do hate to say this to our atheist friends, But according to the smartest man in the world, Chris Langan, G-d exists. And Langan particularly likes the Bible. Like it or not, There are wise men who say that G-d exists.

Thus, Albert Einstein said: "I believe in Spinoza"s G-d who reveals Himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, Not in a G-d who concerns Himself with fates and actions of human beings. "
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.