The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)

Notwithtanding modern technology and given the fundamentality of reproduction.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
billsands has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/9/2019 Category: People
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 210 times Debate No: 121224
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)




Is it therefore fair to describe homosexuality as abnormal.
Of course, Technology negates the fundamentality of reproduction. So I would therefore assert that this is would seem to be an evolutionary certainty. Are evolutionary certainties therefore better defining principles than temporary conceptualities?
Though concepts, Intangible as they are, Are real enough to the conceiver and as far as we know that is really all that matters. So where does the notion of abnormality lie within a constant confusion of collective thoughts and evolutionary certainty.
I would propose that the realism of conceptuality is enough to affirm an individual judgement, Despite any weight of opposition. Therefore realistically rendering abnormality and/or normality for that matter, As not being truly definable.


What is normal? I f by normal you mean antural, Then the question isn't can homosexuals reproduce, Thats not why gays do it. Another question to determine whether it is "normal" is to investigate whether and to what extent it occur in nature? Homosexuality pre dates the bible so its been around since day one. Are there gay animals, Do homosexual encounters occur in the world of the animals? No species has been found in which homosexual behaviour has not been shown to exist, With the exception of species that never have sex at all, Such as sea urchins and aphis. Moreover, A part of the animal kingdom is hermaphroditic, Truly bisexual. For them, homosexuality is not an issue.
Debate Round No. 1


Hello. Nice to debate with you.

Though you appear to have taken the Con side of the debate.

Pro should attempt to uphold the proposition that implies that it's fair to regard homosexuality as abnormal.

My apologies if the wording of the proposition may have confused you.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.