Should Indians be illegal? Part 4
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
anc2006
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 4/22/2019 | Category: | Cars | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 537 times | Debate No: | 121474 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)
yeah they should they stinky and smell lik mother fu**ing curry and i don't like stinky people and indians are stinky with red dots on there foreheads
Also Biggsboonj is banned from voting on account of him being a cunt and having a -2 pp
i accept the challenge. Looking forward to your first real argument. |
![]() |
they stinky and smell like curry
"they stinky and smell like curry" This is your full argument. I might as well call that a false conduct. We should forgive and accept people who were stinky by acceptable reasons, Such as labor working all day. Not feeling superior to them. Smell like Curry? That is also false consider how curry is delicious and how we should appreciate them to make things that at least some people appreciates. Appreciate. Not hate. Also there are 1. 4 billion people in india. You would want the UN agency work for more than double the refugees? India is a country. Not an organization set up randomly. It is not Ku klux klan. Await for your response. |
![]() |
first of all you must be mentally impaired indians are lazy and don't work at all
plus indians tame snakes and have red dots on their foreheads
"first of all you must be mentally impaired indians are lazy and don't work at all" No. Within their work india is just below china in many fields. "plus indians tame snakes and have red dots on their foreheads" That is just tradition. no mess. Self explanatory. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
12InchBeef | anc2006 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Pro called Con "mentally impaired". That's poor conduct.