The Instigator
anc2006
Pro (for)
Winning
1 Points
The Contender
Honkler
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

The Zodiac is fake

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
anc2006
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/24/2019 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 428 times Debate No: 121502
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (9)
Votes (1)

 

anc2006

Pro

The Zodiac is fake

Evidence #1: In Philadelphia Nikola Tesla conducted an experiment with Albert Einstein, And the purpose of it is to teleport the particular battleship around; and it did.
W56; Time traveling is possible to be achieved
Evidence #2: traveling at ultralight speed can let you age quicker.
W56; you can grow older as you want.
W57; it"s the time you had before time traveling if you shift back, And you"re older than the people that borned within you.
W56; you actually manipulated your birth date.

Evidence #3: Zodiac signs are divided into 12 one-month periods, Each has their own personality.
W57; it is possible to let you travel in time enough to shift at least 1 month of time.
W56; you can shift to a time where you weren"t born in your time with your original zodiac sign
Also W57; it is your original body (not a clone), So no DNA change and no personality change
W56; The Zodiac signs are no longer predictable even if it is before your time-travels.
W56; The zodiac is fake.
Honkler

Con

You a k*ke? You sound like a little b*tch
Debate Round No. 1
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by dsjpk5 3 years ago
dsjpk5
This one?
Posted by anc2006 3 years ago
anc2006
Learn logic. My fellow debater.
Posted by anc2006 3 years ago
anc2006
Matureness isn't like this. Having sex does not necessarily makes you mature, But learning how to debate can.
Posted by Honkler 3 years ago
Honkler
This guy still wets the bed. Vote for me.
Posted by anc2006 3 years ago
anc2006
*work
Posted by anc2006 3 years ago
anc2006
thou must read with care and seek the truth layeth within the text of thy vision, And yet vote with thy right mind within the most enforceable argument; comment on the section of the second with careful words that does the word of reinforcing the clearness, And not the unnecessary tension of the unfair, And review all before posting on the website to filter out the necessary out of the text of the unnecessary, That above all will minimize the unintended harm towards the humanity.
Posted by Honkler 3 years ago
Honkler
think i won this. Fellow shitlords vote for me.
Posted by anc2006 3 years ago
anc2006
look at his argument. At least mine have paraphrased evidence and his doesn't have any
Posted by anc2006 3 years ago
anc2006
JUst to clarify, W56 is therefore, And w57 is because
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 3 years ago
dsjpk5
anc2006HonklerTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Con called Pro a "kike". That's poor conduct.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.