There is no "God-of-bible" being, Ever existent

First, If you see my weird JoJo profile picture, Just to say I am not Backwardseden.

However, God of bible, As its everything being considered does not need the bible in any possible way as it can manually change every single human ever in the 10D plane. But as seen nothing I said was even REMOTELY done. God cannot be a being as little as Jesus as that Jesus can just erase all the skepticals on a second and convert all people into his belief in less than a few moments if he is god, But in reality he does not have anything god can do. Jesus is at most a fraud because he thinks god need something when in reality God in the Christian iteration have no need to have it, Or even want it.

So use something else: (https://www. Youtube. Com/watch? V=Ul0yAnuLgtM)

Brown hair dude was a human in this video. Yellow hair dude was a vampire that fears the sunlight. All are fictional. The white hair dude and the dog created a fake yellow hair dude in front of the sunlight and tried to execute the brown hair dude, But the brown hair dude already know that the yellow hair dude was a fake because he wouldn't want to walk in the sunlight to help, That is something he doesn't want, Ever.

Now If god want us to change but does not change, It is easy to see though why this is fake. If god can change us altogether in one second, He would not need the bible or Jesus. That scene was based on human intelligence as vampires are technically are as smart as humans, Just stronger in that fictional realm. If something like that was see-though, Then humans could obviously see though everything Jesus's fake god is, As it doesn't even exist because it is a walking contradiction that both created sin and commit sin(sloth, Wrath, Etc)!

Your argument basically is, "If there"s a God, It can just change us whenever it wants to fit it"s idea of what we should be".

This is your opinion of what "God" is, Which isn"t necessarily the reality or fact of the matter. There are also varying arguments on how The Bible is to be read. . . Either literally or figuratively. It"s pretty obvious to me that it"s meant to be taken figuratively and symbolically. . As Jesus preached through parables and I think we can all agree none of us has ever seen a talking snake.

So, Putting aside those aspects of your topic that are not clarified, I"ll respond with the following:
The Universe is, By definition, The entirety of spacetime. It is "all that was, Is, And ever will be. . Including all possibilities and assumptions". This means we have always existed in a Singularity and there is no "Time", And all of existence is just one moment. How do you calculate the value of a year in the time before there was an Earth and a Sun, Much less human minds to recognize the pattern of sunrise and sunset?

Considering the above, It must be assumed that we are fractal aspects of the ONE thing in existence which is just trying to study itself. The Bible states we are "created in God"s image" and "the Kingdom of God is within you". It means there is no "external" and everything is merely consciousness. We are all "God", And the God of the Bible is also the God of the Bhagavad Gita, The Quaran, The Torah, And all other religious texts.

Your argument is that God exists on itself, Which can be true, But it is proof it does not exist in the form of Christ. Christian god is a misunderstanding of what you have, And a god according to solely the bible and not the Quran wouldn't exist.

The god of Bible commit a sin he created said to go to hell. People who commit pride(in an ill manner) would go to hell, But God, Said that he is the only right one and the other religions are wrong(Other religion are also by him, But in all religions he boasts the same way), Which God is bragging a fake news and having the false pride, So he deserve to go to hell. But at the same time, God lives in heaven, And god going to hell is impossible, So essentially they contradict each other, And which means a deity that follows the rules of the Bible would not exist. A "god" as in an agnostic theist's view would exist in your description, But we are arguing as if a god of bible exist, Which it does not, As he does things a real god even written in the 21st century would certainly not do.

You speak of the "God of the Bible" as if the "God of the Bible" is a well-defined subject that everyone agrees on. It's not. The Bible can be read in many different ways ranging from purely literal to fully esoteric. I personally see the Bible (and all "Inspired" religious texts) as purely esoteric descriptions of patterns which exist in human life. Take the following, For example:

The Flood. The flood refers to any time in your life where a major life change occurs that upends the dynamics of the routine you've become comfortable with. It can refer to a newfound epiphany of understanding about any subject matter. An "a ha! " moment that causes you to re-evaluate your thoughts on life. It is a "Flood" of information and ideas, Not a literal flood of water on the physical planet Earth.

You stated, "Your argument is that God exists on itself, Which can be true, But it is proof it does not exist in the form of Christ"
"Christ" is the inspired and illuminated aspect of yourself which comes forth after significant self reflection and internal honestly. You have the ability to live as Christ when you reach a state of honestly with yourself that allows you to accept who you are, Inclusive of all your flaws, And take honest steps towards how you would like your world to be going forward. Christ is the aspect of yourself that is the pure form of willful creation. Christ is not a historical figure, Just as the Bible is not a historical text.

Then you stated, "The god of Bible commit a sin he created said to go to hell. People who commit pride(in an ill manner) would go to hell, But God, Said that he is the only right one and the other religions are wrong(Other religion are also by him, But in all religions he boasts the same way), Which God is bragging a fake news and having the false pride, So he deserve to go to hell. "
What is heaven and hell? If you understand the Bible in the way I do, You'd see that Heaven and Hell are states of being, Which are currently present in your life. Gluttony, For example, Does not necessarily have to refer to food. . It can refer to any aspect of your life that you overindulge in. If you are overindulging in certain things that cause you life to experience a negative impact, You are "in hell". If you overcome your overindulgences and prevail through them, You are "in Heaven". Certain aspects of your being can exist in "Heaven" while other aspects of your being exist "in Hell". These are not post-life places, They are presently existing states of being. . . And are specific to every individual.

As you see, Arguing the existence of "The God of the Bible" is impossible, Since the "God of the Bible" means different things to different people, And there is no one standard definition of what that is. That's why there are different faiths and denominations that base their beliefs on the Bible, But approach it's teachings in different ways.

I prove all my points last round. Now if you are saying there is no defined bible of god, There certainly wouldn't be one consider its definition is incomplete, And the way to prove its existence was lacked. That would certainly mean that nothing matches the differing definition. Let's say if asd3fg5h6jkl0jklm98x is a thing, I say it is a computer, You say it is a lamp, He say it is a mattress, She says it is a mannequin. There is nothing that can be all four, Thus nothing fits this definition really. Same with god. If there are different definitions about it, That especially conflicts, It means nothing fits, Because God can be one or the other, Not the garbo of all these conflicting speeches together that will be impossible.

And ah yes, If god is a human creation, It is pretty fictional consider humans would exist after the period god would come in, Which is eternally before humanity. If it is a human creation, It essentially means it doesn't exist.

You still have not defined what you mean by "God-of-Bible". It seems you're trying to pin "God-of-Bible" down as some ultra-fundamentalist, Purely literal entity through a strictly literal reading of the Bible as if it were a history book. I can't continue on with your debate because you lack a defined argument. Refer to my previous posts.