Debate.org is closing and the website will be taken offline on May 30, 2022.
Members can download their content by using the Download Data button in My Account. For more information, please refer to our FAQs page.
The Instigator
anc2006
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Dr.Franklin
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

This is a debate

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/18/2019 Category: Economics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 403 times Debate No: 121890
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)

 

anc2006

Pro

You may start.
Dr.Franklin

Con

So i looked at your political views and saw you were pro Barack Obama. So lets debate that

1. He had the worst economic recovery ever.
2. He bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia
3. His friend said:"God bless American, No no no, God damn America"
4. Black unemployment was a ALL TIME HIGH and he said"Stop crying, Stop your grumbling and get a job! "
5. He refereed to his own people, Black people as the n word.
6. He let Russia take over Crimea and let them bomb Syria with no consequences
Debate Round No. 1
anc2006

Pro

My opponent misunderstand the title of the debate. The objective of the opposite side is to argue that this isn't a debate.
Dr.Franklin

Con

This is not a debate, Because I agree that this is not a debate, So if we disagree, No debate
Debate Round No. 2
anc2006

Pro

you can treat this as an argument, And an argument still needs 2 sides with at least 1 subjects each, But with insufficient words and hard-to-tell language.

of course I will call this a debate since this is my side and you won't because that is your side, But I mean, You can basically argue like an informal argument with me and prove this isn't a debate, Not pushing the responsibility and avoids the opportunity.

because I call this a debate, I will treat this like one. A new topic would be introduced after this and it won't disappoint anybody (or nobody). Since this has 2 rounds left, Let's just leave 2 rounds of trashtalking and moving forward to a 2-round debate. You have the right to debate, Forfeit or to do anything. I don't expect anything due to your specific viewpoint, And you have the right to do nothing.

New topic: Nintendo is better than PlayStation (Everybody except dr. Franklin are obligatory to read the things below)

Argument 1(new)

the company Nintendo created many successful games such as Mario kart 7 and Mario 3d land, Games that a casual gamer would find fun with. While on the playstation almost only 3rd party games exists, And are most likely only being played by true gamers that are hardcore.

first is that if the games are more for casual gamers, The amount of business would go up sufficiently and efficiently, While hardcore games would possibly go nothing too much from a steady rate. Also Playstation teams only design consoles but make barely any games, And even they do it couldn't be anything better than tiger, Ljn and Big rigs.

and second many Nintendo/playstation owners are children. They own consoles like Wii U and Ps3. Well not if better technology is always better, Because too much ahead-of-time technology replica would be too harsh like the virtual boy (and even that they tried, While playstation are bland). I said Playstation(especially 2 and up)s are for hardcore gamers and Nintendo consoles are for casual gamers such as the 2ds, The gamecube, And even the snes are timeless classics that adapts casual gamers very nicely and smoothly while the playstations would simply thrash the new gamers and except they find it fun, That would be 2 extremes: too much addiction to hate to the thing. Nintendo keeps up the the casuals because they're the moderation: none are perfect but anyone could find it fun (like Wii sports). And that means Ps owners that are children will either slack school or throw it in the garbage, While Nintendo children would play it as long as it's fun.
Dr.Franklin

Con

I agree, No debating needed. This is not a debate
Debate Round No. 3
Debate Round No. 4
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by anc2006 2 years ago
anc2006
how
Posted by bruh101 2 years ago
bruh101
franklin wins
Posted by anc2006 3 years ago
anc2006
okay so i can debate like this is an debate then
Posted by Dr.Franklin 3 years ago
Dr.Franklin
*agree*
No votes have been placed for this debate.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.