death penalty
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 12/7/2007 | Category: | Society | ||
Updated: | 14 years ago | Status: | Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 60,271 times | Debate No: | 161 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (65)
Votes (50)
two wrongs don't make a right. killing people who kill people isn't teaching anyone anything except to reciprocate with something more dramatic and unnecessary.
Okay good point, but putting a mass murder in jail and having tax payers pay for 3 square meals and a pretty decent life isn't teaching anyone especially them any lesions. |
![]() |
everyone makes mistakes, some worse than others. but everyone deserves a second chance. if someone would go as far to intentionally kill someone, then something must be clinically wrong with them. whether it's out of anger, envy, or jealousy they have a twisted way of thinking that killing the person who is making them feel like that is the best way to go. anyone who thinks like that should see a therapist, not be considered a liability to our country.
if someone does "go insane" and kills a mass amount of people or even just one, and is convicted who do you think is paying for there therapist?! |
![]() |
the same people who are paying to keep them in prison. the same people who pay for their meals. the same people who pay for lethal injection. it's more convenient and saves money to use capitol punishment over a life sentence, but no one has the authority to chose whether someone lives or dies.
it's not that it's just cheaper but if no one has that authority to take someone else's life then the person that commited that crime must reap the same doing. if someone decides one day to take someones life for no good reason then they should in my opinion get the same treatment. "an eye for an eye" |
![]() |
50 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by carriead20 7 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Vote Placed by ockcatdaddy 9 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 6 |
Reasons for voting decision: death penalty is swift ans just
Vote Placed by vmpire321 10 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: fffffffail. Btw, did anyone notice they come from the same city?
Vote Placed by 16kadams 10 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: fail
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 10 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Vote Placed by thett3 10 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 0 |
Reasons for voting decision: This was the worst debate I've ever seen.
Vote Placed by Alchemistress 11 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
Vote Placed by welldonesteak 12 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by bookwormbill111 13 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 7 |
Vote Placed by Ineffablesquirrel 13 years ago
marge11 | mariahsaywhaaa | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | ![]() | - | - | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | ![]() | - | - | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 7 | 0 |
A few ideas I thought would be worth sharing:
The argument "you're no better than they are" is absurd. Killing a guilty person is not the same as killing an innocent person.
The argument "everyone deserves a second chance" - agreed, Especially murder victims.
When there is a grieving family and the dead body of a victim that needs to be buried. . Concerning yourself at all with the well-being / mental health of the murderer seems wrong somehow.
Does one waive their civil rights when they choose not to be civil?
I'm sure there's a gray area, But when it happens to someone you know, It's hard to think anything would be too harsh a punishment for a murder.
I'd be in favor of the death penalty, If I had enough faith in the justice systems to PROPERLY implement it.
1) Death is not inherently bad to the dead. The secular (me) believe that death is like having eternity pass in a night. Thus it cannot be bad, Only a nothing. The only reason murder is bad is because it harms living people's emotional and life quality. When public opinion says that a man is bad, Killing him relieves their hate and feelings of insecurity.
2) The mentally ill, Are, For the most part, Responsible for their actions. There DOES have to be something wrong with you if you kill somebody, But that doesn't excuse or justify wrong. It's something that's mostly inherent, At the moment incurable. It's in the way they process and think. Even if they were released when cured, The public would hate them still, Which leads to the next point. . .
3) The public is ruthless. The group absolves the individual of guilt, So lynchings would become more common. Despite the fact that many are against the death penalty, Feelings change when your friend is killed. Even if not, There will always be people eager to fill the role of judge, Jury and executor. By letting the government control who lives and dies, Unnecessary and cruel killings are avoided.
4) "Murder is murder is murder is. . . " Yeah. The death penalty IS murder. Murder with a deserving victim and a guiltless system. Saying 'murder' doesn't change the fact that it's an act that can have positive effects. "Murder is bad", Ah, A man of wisdom. Murder is not inherently bad for reasons I have already stated: death cannot be anything but good (heaven/punishment) or nothing, It is bad because it affects the welfare of people. This is my arbitrary line in the sand; people are important because I'm a person and would like to be benefited. Thus I assume the same for everyone else. The people benefit from knowing the evil is gone. Then murdering evil is good for the people (not the person), And the 'mentally ill' no longer suffer.
Thank you for reading.
Exodus 21:12 - He that smiteth a man, So that he die, Shall be surely put to death.
Numbers 35:30-31 - Whoso killeth any person, The murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witnesses: but one witness shall not testify against any person [to cause him] to die.
God doesn't beleive in capital punishment?
Maybe you need to read your bible.
However, I was left agreeing with con.
At the end of the day, The death penalty is wrong - Pro's main point here was its a cost-effective way to remove criminals from society. . . But as con stated pretty clearly these people who are killing people. . . Committing terrible crimes against society are MENTALLY ILL.
The question here is does society have a responsibility to address the mental health of its criminals?
The answer although uneasy to accept is yes. The people in society who commit mass shootings, Murders, Rape people etc. . . . These people have had society neglect and fail them. The science shows us that there is a strong AF correlation between school shooters, White supremists etc, And children who grow up facing abuse, Drugs, Incaration of parents, Lack of education. . . So one. Society has failed them! - We don't not get to choose what family we are born in. . . Whether are parents are going to be apart of gangs, Do drugs, Go to jail, Beat us! - Thus society HAS an obligation to swoop in when these people get to the stage where they commit terrible crimes and FIX THEM! - Society should have been there right at the start to stop the bad upbringing of the child! - But they werent. . . .
Rehabilitation of these criminals although expensive and costly to the tax payer dollar is a society responsibility. We ALL owe those people a proper life. . . A decent future, And a healthy mind. Killing off our own problems sure aint gonna fix them people!