The Instigator
Con (against)
The Contender
Pro (for)


Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Challenge Expired or Declined
debatefan01 either declined this challenge, or never responded to it. If you are KirstinKate, login to see your options.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/28/2009 Category: Politics
Updated: 12 years ago Status: Challenge Declined
Viewed: 24,504 times Debate No: 6678
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)




That Euthanasia is moral in a medical setting.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by 1leroy 2 years ago
Make it personal and ask yourself this question, Do you want to be murdered when you are old?
Posted by Charlatte 2 years ago
I do not think their child would do that if they loved their parent. They would do it for their parents benefit, Not theirs. Some might not like their parents(understandable) but euthanasia should not be up to them unless that person cannot make the decision themselves. If it is at that point then it would really mean they are ill and probably would be suffering.
Posted by Itsmehayden 2 years ago
I disagree with allowing euthanasia to be legal. Many times, When parents are suffering from terminal / fatal diseases, Their (adult) children want to alleviate themselves from the financial burden that the treatment (of their parents) incurs on their bank accounts, And they use "relieving their pain" as a pretext for this ulterior motive. This occurrence is prevalent in many countries, Eg India.
Posted by Charlatte 2 years ago
I agree with the idea of people signing a document at a certain age. Although I also do believe that euthanasia has good moral value. If the person is suffering and likely won't like how they will have to live out their days then it should ultimately be their choice, No one else can choose for them. It's like how a vet would put down an animal for an incurable illness, This is essentially the same thing with people. Not everyone will agree of course, There are pros and cons when it comes to debates about certain things.
Posted by NettSpaghet 3 years ago
I think that nobody should be euthanized. We should all have to sign a document at a certain age so that if we do rely on machines for air and/or our heart pumping we will have proof of what we wanted.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.