television is not the effective means of imparting education
Debate Round Forfeited
anaylama2 has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
| Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
| Started: | 8/25/2016 | Category: | TV | ||
| Updated: | 5 years ago | Status: | Debating Period | ||
| Viewed: | 740 times | Debate No: | 94976 | ||
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)
 Pro  Con Source- http://www.merriam-webster.com... Observance- A television is basically just a screen with fixed or moving objects with sound and this is all it necessarily entails. Considering that television only entails having something on the screen and sound, what one is capable of doing with a television is, for example, using some sort of social medium where you can video chat, therefore you can have a teacher communicate with the owner of the TV which would be identical to the aspects of classroom teaching, in the aspects that matter. This debate says TV is not an effective means of imparting education, so we have to look at the capabilities the TV is capable of in imparting education, which would be the same as a classroom, or online tutor. Therefore the TV would be effective. "We see that children do not watch educative programmes but spend their time watching different non-educative channels" How someone uses a TV does not define how capable a TV is of imparting education. |
 |
|
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
 |
|
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
 |
|
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet. |
 |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
This debate has 4 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.
