Total Posts:142|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

Real Research: Curse Of Canaan

ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/4/2019 2:06:10 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The Curse of Canaan.

25 Cursed be Canaan, a servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers.

26 Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

Let's break the curse down. . .

Curses on Canaan:
1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers
2. Canaan shall be his [Shem's] servant.
3. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant

Blessings
1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem
2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

Three curses and three blessings.

I maintain that the curse of Canaan is fulfilled in the slavery of India.

* Indians are the descendants of Canaan.
* Arabs are the descendants of Japheth.
* The British are the descendants of Shem.

So let's compare the history of India and Africa and see which one better fits the curse of Canaan in Gen 9.

Curses

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

Blessings

1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem

The descendants of Shem, The ancestor of the Roman empire, Saw their God exalted above all gods. The god of Japheth - Allah, The god of Canaan - Krishna.

2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .

a. God shall enlarge Japheth. . .

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Madai is also the name of the deified ancestor of the Kachin people of Myanmar, According to the indigenous Kachin religion.

Also linked with Madai is the Iranian city of Hamadan.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. [18] He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.

The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.

For those who say Indians are white. . . .


http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm
Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.

So let us summerize. . .

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

D. Japth shall dwell in the tents of Shem. . .
Who dwelled in the tents of Shem?
Africans - No. Indians - No

E. Cursed be Canaan. . .
Most Africans were never slaves, But for 17 centuries, ALL Indians were slaves. The curse better fits the group that suffered complete slavery.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery, But for 17 centuries, All Indians, Every one of them, Were slaves or the slaves of slaves. Just as the bible prophesies.

This is real research, And not 8th grade illiterate nonsense.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/5/2019 3:40:18 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The moron is spamming every thread but this one. I wonder why?

The curse of Ham is on Indians and he doesn't want to look at the truth. Indian slavery fits the curse to the letter.

A minute ago the moron was goading me to "discuss" the curse. Now, He's AWOL. Just as Gandhi said. A coward.
Willows
Posts: 11,684
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 12:58:28 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
The Curse of Canaan.

25 Cursed be Canaan, a servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers.

26 Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

27 God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

Let's break the curse down. . .

Curses on Canaan:
1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers
2. Canaan shall be his [Shem's] servant.
3. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant

Blessings
1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem
2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

Three curses and three blessings.

I maintain that the curse of Canaan is fulfilled in the slavery of India.

* Indians are the descendants of Canaan.
* Arabs are the descendants of Japheth.
* The British are the descendants of Shem.

So let's compare the history of India and Africa and see which one better fits the curse of Canaan in Gen 9.

Curses

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

Blessings

1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem

The descendants of Shem, The ancestor of the Roman empire, Saw their God exalted above all gods. The god of Japheth - Allah, The god of Canaan - Krishna.

2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .

a. God shall enlarge Japheth. . .

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Madai is also the name of the deified ancestor of the Kachin people of Myanmar, According to the indigenous Kachin religion.

Also linked with Madai is the Iranian city of Hamadan.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. [18] He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.

The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.

For those who say Indians are white. . . .


http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm
Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.

So let us summerize. . .

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

D. Japth shall dwell in the tents of Shem. . .
Who dwelled in the tents of Shem?
Africans - No. Indians - No

E. Cursed be Canaan. . .
Most Africans were never slaves, But for 17 centuries, ALL Indians were slaves. The curse better fits the group that suffered complete slavery.
Africans - No. Indians - Yes

The curse was not to all of Canaan's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery, But for 17 centuries, All Indians, Every one of them, Were slaves or the slaves of slaves. Just as the bible prophesies.

This is real research, And not 8th grade illiterate nonsense.

The problem is that the results of such "in-depth " research are totally unverified, Unverifiable and completely false.
Do you honestly think you can pull the wool over the eyes of anyone with half a brain?
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 12:23:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
This is real research, And not 8th grade illiterate nonsense.

The problem is that the results of such "in-depth " research are totally unverified, Unverifiable and completely false.

All my links are cited, And each link has multiple other links. If you disagree with a claim, Say what it is. Right now, Only your claim is unverified.

The claims in my research are not "unverifiable". We have professional historians, Anthropologists, And archeologists who have verified these things. The facts here are not new or novel to anyone with a descent education. Like Hindu hari, You are racist and you hate me, So you have double the reason to not accept the truth.

Do you honestly think you can pull the wool over the eyes of anyone with half a brain?

The curse of ham stupidity is really a project of the moron. I don't care who is black or white, He does. I don't even care if the moron calls me African. So what wool would I be trying to pull? The both of you are consumed with race. I am not, But neither of you will talk of anything else.

I gave my citations. If you have nothing concrete to contradict them, Then they stand. You say the claims are unverified, But that is all you ever do. You never offer counter arguments, Contradictory proofs, Or simple logical arguments that imply a contradiction.

Do you think it's a guess that the first humans were black? Do you not know DNA can be tracked? Or do you think the movements of people over the globe left no indication? What do you think anthropology is? Could you be that stupid? And are all the ancient and historical documents frauds?

Here is what I am saying, And you cannot argue against it. The so called curse of Ham in the bible is fulfilled to the letter by Indian slavery, With facts that can be checked and verified. And it matters not if the actual story is true. Indian slavery still fits the bill perfectly.

Hari's only reason for choosing Africans as the bearers of the curse is because he is a racist and is uneducated about science and history. But I noticed you only called the claims unverified when I listed them. You've been fine with hari's uncited claims.

You have half a brain, (or you only use half your brain. Same difference) If I was pulling wool, You'd be the first one duped.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 6:35:57 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Indians and Africans have a common ancestor.

https://www. Upi. Com/Science_News/

Where did the earliest Indians come from?

Modern DNA reveals ancient origins of Indian population

The origins of the peoples of the Indian Subcontinent remains a much debated topic among scientists. But new research has offered some clarity on the matter.

The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Previously, A lack of ancient DNA samples has hampered the search for India's genetic origins. The subcontinent has yielded few well-preserved skeletal remains.

Marine Silva, An archaeogeneticist and doctoral student at the University of Huddersfield, Was able to skirt this impediment by using modern DNA sourced from people living in India today.

Their analysis, Detailed in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology, showed India hosts some very ancient lineages and was populated by several waves of migration.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10, 000 and 20, 000 years ago, Shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.

African and Middle Eastern origins are most apparent among the male genetic lineage, The Y-chromosome. The female lineage, Mitochondrial DNA, Suggests a large influx of people from Central Asia migrated to India 5, 000 years ago.


The experts say, Just like the bible says, India was populated by the sons of Cush. Persians and Europeans arrived later. The sons of Seba were already in India when they arrived.

The curse of Ham condemned all Indians to slavery. History shows it. Science shows it. And the bible shows it.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/6/2019 10:03:36 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Indians and Africans have a common ancestor.

https://www. Upi. Com/Science_News/

Where did the earliest Indians come from?

Modern DNA reveals ancient origins of Indian population

The origins of the peoples of the Indian Subcontinent remains a much debated topic among scientists. But new research has offered some clarity on the matter.

The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, the Middle East and Central Asia.

Previously, A lack of ancient DNA samples has hampered the search for India's genetic origins. The subcontinent has yielded few well-preserved skeletal remains.

Marine Silva, An archaeogeneticist and doctoral student at the University of Huddersfield, Was able to skirt this impediment by using modern DNA sourced from people living in India today.

Their analysis, Detailed in the journal BMC Evolutionary Biology, showed India hosts some very ancient lineages and was populated by several waves of migration.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago. More settlers arrived from what is now Iran between 10, 000 and 20, 000 years ago, Shortly after the end of the last ice age. The migrants brought early farming techniques with them.

African and Middle Eastern origins are most apparent among the male genetic lineage, The Y-chromosome. The female lineage, Mitochondrial DNA, Suggests a large influx of people from Central Asia migrated to India 5, 000 years ago.


The same study confirms.
Conclusions

Maternal lineages primarily reflect earlier, Pre-Holocene processes, And paternal lineages predominantly episodes within the last 10 ka. In particular, Genetic influx from Central Asia in the Bronze Age was strongly male-driven, Consistent with the patriarchal, Patrilocal and patrilineal social structure attributed to the inferred pastoralist early Indo-European society. This was part of a much wider process of Indo-European expansion, With an ultimate source in the Pontic-Caspian region, Which carried closely related Y-chromosome lineages, A smaller fraction of autosomal genome-wide variation and an even smaller fraction of mitogenomes across a vast swathe of Eurasia between 5 and 3. 5 ka.

Researchers believe these Bronze Age migrants were Indo-European speakers who populated the grasslands between the Black and Caspian seas. These male-dominated, Roaming pastoralists domesticated the horse and spoke an early iteration of Sanskrit.

Some 200 years ago, Linguists showed Sanskrit is related to Greek and Latin. Previous studies have suggested the same population of horse-riders settled Europe. The latest findings suggest Europeans and Indians share a common ancestor.


The experts say, Just like the bible says, India was populated by the sons of Cush.

The bible say Noah cursed Ham's son Canaan. The Canaanites settled in the Land of Canaanites. Joshua was told by God to slaughter the Canaanites down to every man, Woman and child.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
Indians are not Ethiopians.
Meet some Ethiopians.
https://i. Imgur. Com/d18KASZ. Jpg

You can lie, Or pretend to be obtuse, But the truth remains. Persians and Europeans arrived later. The sons of Seba were already in India when they arrived.
You said that Seba was in India according to Genesis 10:7.
But Genesis 10:7 does not tell us Seba ever left Ethiopia.
So you lied.
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
Indians are not Ethiopians.
The curse of Ham condemned all Indians to slavery. History shows it. Science shows it. And the bible shows it.
The curse of Ham condemned Africans to slavery.
African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the world. Over 20 million African skaves were shipped out of Ghana Africs alone.

Read your confession.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang said: For His Majesty King Jesus? Full time slave here moron. Jesus has my all.
Ethang is a full time slave.

African phenotypes are uniquely African and only seen in African negroids.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks (Africans) and Non-Blacks(Others)

Blacks (Africans) have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks (Africans) have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience"s sake). The Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, The average Bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, And the highly cultivated, Well fed, Well cared for, Partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, Achievement, And behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, Crime, Mortality, And broken homes on one side " and education, Wealth, Human accomplishment, Long life and stable homes on the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, A country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, And it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.

The curse of Ham was clearly pointing to African slavery.
Genesis 9:25 The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers. "
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 5:30:39 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, The Middle East and Central Asia.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago.


Never bet against the bible you moron.

Just like the bible says. The world was populated by the sons of Noah. They were black. Some of them moved to, And settled in India. If you were educated, You would have known this.

Your country's ancestors were black sons of Cush. The curse is on Indians. That is why Indian slavery fits the curse so perfectly.

How sad, A black idiot yelling "niggar, Niggar! " You look like a monkey.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/7/2019 4:14:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
The latest analysis suggests India was populated by a succession of migrations from Africa, The Middle East and Central Asia.

The earliest Indians were hunter-gatherers from Africa. They arrived on the subcontinent 50, 000 years ago.


Never bet against the bible you moron.

Just like the bible says. The world was populated by the sons of Noah. They were black. Some of them moved to, And settled in India. If you were educated, You would have known this.

Your country's ancestors were black sons of Cush. The curse is on Indians. That is why Indian slavery fits the curse so perfectly.

How sad, A black idiot yelling "niggar, Niggar! " You look like a monkey.

The different theories about the origin of species.

Evolution theory 1

Humans evolved from a common ancestor; monkeys!
In the beginning Darwin wrote in The descent of man: "The Simiadae then branched off into two great stems, The New World and Old World monkeys; and from the latter, At a remote period, Man, The wonder and glory of the Universe, Proceeded.

Where did the common ancestors (Monkeys) come from?
Out of Asia: How Monkey and Ape Ancestors Colonized Africa
A new fossil discovery suggests that anthropoid ancestors originated in Asia and then rafted across the ocean to Africa

Evolution theory 2.
Scientists replace common ancestor Out of Asia monkeys with Out of Africa black monkeys. But when that didn't work they come out with the Out of Africa Blacks and dropped the word monkey.

No one is buying the out of Africa theory today. Africans living in Africa haven't changed much. And those living out of Africa have the highest school drop out rates, 30% of Africans are in prison, 30% of Africans are inemployed. The rest are either drug dealers or pimps with some exceptions. All this proves Africans are genetically different with lower IQ than non Africans and their dark skin and negroid appearance can be traced back to subhuman species now established as African ancestors.
Even interracial marriages cannot wean out the negroid because negroid genes are dominant genes. It puts back the jungle instincts in every negroid generation.

I just proved to you the African race has not evolved. They are basically where they were when they started out. Low IQ, Jungle culture. Whereas all other races evolved and show little resemblance to dark skinned negroid appearance of subhuman species.
These links were artificially established to explain the evolution of race. But it was an over simplistic view.

We don't see a similar pattern of migration with animals and many are region specific.
There is even an out of Australia theory and an out of Israel theory. The fact the rest of the world didn't turn out like Africans makes it obvious we did not all start out as Africans.

If you take the Genesis account. The garden of Eden was not in Africa. The Jews being the diect descendants of Adam and Eve were not Africans. In fact Christians trace the lineage of Africans to Ham.

The First Race: Out-of-*Australia, Not Africa!
http://nationalunitygovernment. Org/content/first-race-out-australia-not-africa-0

Take it from the experts. The only Africans out of Africa were slaves. Their negroid appearance and dark skin was unknown to the free world.
After scientists discovered Africans had lower IQ than non Africans. The out of Africa theory lost credibility because dumb people are only found in Africa. Ancient civilizations were far more advanced than even modern Africa today. Nothing good ever came out of Africa.

But we know Blacks themselves are self loathing and hate being black. Now we have a black self loathing negroid Ethang5 promoting the Out of Africa theory which suggests we are all Africans. Lol!

Read nigger Ethang5's disparaging comments about his African country and African people.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang said: For His Majesty King Jesus? Full time slave here moron. Jesus has my all.
Ethang is a full time slave.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where the literacy rate is below 50%, And I see people do here, Exactly what this "test" is doing. Taking advantage of ignorance.
Ethang5 said: I live close to where Boko Haram operates. There are no Boko Harams in America.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.

Ethang5 wrote: I think you're right. I live in Ghana, West Africa, And if you were to try the "God is evil" argument here people would simply think you were an obnoxious boob.

Ethang5 wrote: Long ago, I had a night job where I worked with this guy much like Im-Em here. He told me that reality was whatever he believed.

Ethang5 wrote: I currently live in a country with a society much closer to the 1st century than the society in which you live. I have seen people get burned alive in the street, And people a few blocks away never hear of it.

Ethang5 wrote: Having been kicked off more than a hundred forums, I understand your trepidation. But I don't think you have too much to worry about. The overwhelming majority of posters here would not want you banned or censured.

Ethang5 wrote:. I live among people like the Piraha. They have to work ALL DAY. Do you believe they are working only when hunting or gathering food? Do you think they have running water? Or electricity? They sleep often during the day because it is hot and they must work for everything. There are no stores, Only rudimentary tools. Please. Working only 15 hours a week would kill them, As evidenced by their dwindling tribe.

Ethang5 wrote: In Ghana where I live, The JW's are more aggressive. I always talk to them and let them know the many times when their organization made false prophesies about the end of the world.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, West Africa. If you think life is miserable, Come here and I will open your eyes. I will show you people who will infect you with their joy. Yet they aren't all Pollyannas. Some are cynics who have simply decided not to allow their environment to define them.

Ethang5 wrote: I have an electrified fence at my house. I had it put in. Is it wrong that I warn visitors to my home about it? If a visitor ignores my warning, Can he claim because I installed it, I'm responsible for his injury after having not believed my warning?
I work with prisoners. Many say they are Christian because the think it will facilitate their case with the parole board.

Ethang5 wrote: This is like when whites tell blacks, Why are you always on about racism? A black person's ethnicity is obvious.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.

Your said your father was a black negroid atheist. But you turned out to be a black negroid slave delivering bibles for free whereas your position as an atheist was that religion was a crutch for the mentally weak. "

Karmic Justice combined with the curse of Ham and Slavery by Arabs produced Black shitholes.
Wow! Africans are cursed in 4 religions. Judaism, Islam, Christianity and Hinduism.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/8/2019 12:48:07 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Just as the bible says, There was a time people could walk from Egypt to India to Australia, They were all connected. Those wondering how the descendants of Noah could have peopled locations like India and Australia usually are ignorant of the history of plate tectonics.

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Indian_Plate
The Indian Plate or India Plate is a major tectonic plate straddling the equator in the eastern hemisphere. Originally a part of the ancient continent of Gondwana, India broke away from the other fragments of Gondwana 100 million years ago and began moving north. [2] Once fused with the adjacent Australia to form a single Indo-Australian Plate, Recent studies suggest that India and Australia have been separate plates for at least 3 million years and likely longer.

Gen 1:9 - And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, And let the dry land appear: and it was so.

Nature, As made by God, Will always confound every idea of man that rebels from the sovereignty of God.

Moron racists of all stripes have tried to revise human history to fit their silly beliefs, But the history of nature itself frustrates them.

Google "Gondwana" and get an additional bit of information about the world that will inoculate you from the disease loonies will try to give you.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/9/2019 4:38:19 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Just as the bible says, There was a time people could walk from Egypt to India to Australia, They were all connected. Those wondering how the descendants of Noah could have peopled locations like India and Australia usually are ignorant of the history of plate tectonics.

Genesis 10 tells us how the start of nations began.
From the beginning major rivers were identified around the Garden of Eden which proves the continents were separated by rivers and seas.
The fact the Bible mentions the major rivers Tigris and Euphrates Rivers as the location of the Garden of Eden suggests the continents were already define and separated by rivers and oceans.
Genesis 2:8-14:
The Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden. Now a river went out of Eden to water the garden, And from there it parted and became four riverheads. The name of the first is Pishon. The name of the second river is Gihon. The name of the third river is Hiddekel [Tigris]. The fourth river is the Euphrates.

It took Moses 40 years to travel from Egypt to the land of Canaan. The distance between Egypt and the land of Canaan is only 250 miles. .
The distance between Ethiopia and New Deli India via Egypt is over 4000 miles. It would have been impossible for Ethiopians to migrate to India. Which explains why Canaan and his children settled in the land of Canaan which was neighbouring Egypt. The only Africans in India were brought as slaves to India by the Arabs. These African slaves were from the Bantu tribe. In Africa. They were isolated by Indians and are almost extinct.

Genesis 10 tells us Noah sons Shem, Japheth and Ham maintained their lines of descent within their nations.

Genesis 10:32 These are the clans of Noah"s sons, According to their lines of descent, Within their nations. From these the nations spread out over the earth after the flood.

These are the nations started by Ham, Shem and Japheth.
The bible does not tell us all the humans descended from Africa. The Bible tells us all the humans descended from Noah after the flood and his children Shem, Japheth and Ham started the nations each carving out separate countries for their descendants.
Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

Five Sons of Shem
1. Elam (Arabia)
2. Asshur (Assyria)
3. Lud (Lydians)
4. Aram (Aramaic, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Syria)
5. Arphaxad (From which Abraham descended)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Shem or his descendants were never in Africa.

3. Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Now you know why the curse of Ham only condemned Africans who were the descendants of Hams children who built the African nations.
Africans were owned and traded as slaves by the Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout their African history.

The Bible does not tell us Noah and all his children started out in Africa. It tells us only Ham and his children were the first Africans.
So the bible rebuts the Out of Africa Theory as the origins of humans. In fact the bible stopped the migration of Africans Out of Africa when Joshua destroyed the Canaanites.


https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Indian_Plate
The Indian Plate or India Plate is a major tectonic plate straddling the equator in the eastern hemisphere. Originally a part of the ancient continent of Gondwana, India broke away from the other fragments of Gondwana 100 million years ago and began moving north. [2] Once fused with the adjacent Australia to form a single Indo-Australian Plate, Recent studies suggest that India and Australia have been separate plates for at least 3 million years and likely longer.

Gen 1:9 - And God said, Let the waters under the heaven be gathered together unto one place, And let the dry land appear: and it was so.

You are going into theories which do not fit the biblical narrative.
Genesis tells us God created the universe in 6 days and gives a detail of what was created each day. Read your bible, Nigger.
It did not take God millions of years. It took God just 6 days.
2 Peter 3:8 Beloved, Do not let this one thing escape your notice: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, And a thousand years are like a day.

Even the geneology in the Bible from Jesus to Adam was 4000 years.

TIME FROM ADAM TO JESUS

Adam to Abraham = 1948 yrs
Abraham to Egypt =290 yrs

From Egypt to Moses: (X) Let X = 63 63 yrs

X = (Kohath to Amram to Moses)

Moses to the Exodus = 80 yrs
Exodus to death Joshua = 70 yrs
Judges to Samuel = 450 yrs (Acts 13:20)
Kings of Judah = 513 yrs
Babylonian Captivity = 586 B. C. E.
--
Adam to Jesus 4000 yrs

And from the beginning there are rivers and seas reported in Genesis which show the land mass was already divided and separated by rivers and seas.
Genesis 10 even mentions the start of Nations soon after the Ark landed.


Nature, As made by God, Will always confound every idea of man that rebels from the sovereignty of God.
Christians believe the bible is the inerrant word of God. You have been smuggling bibles fir over 15 years. Why are you so scripturally ignorant?

Moron racists of all stripes have tried to revise human history to fit their silly beliefs, But the history of nature itself frustrates them.
The evidence for the curse of Ham is biblical. Noah's curse condemns Africans to slavery. Africans were owned and traded as slaves by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the World. 20 million African slaves were shipped out of Ghana alone.
The migration of Africans Out of Africa was a result and consequence of African Slavery.

Google "Gondwana" and get an additional bit of information about the world that will inoculate you from the disease loonies will try to give you.

Evolutionist claimed the common ancestors of Humans were monkeys.
The supercontinent only strengthens the theory humans evolve from the same monkeys because they all lived on one continent.
The phenotypes of humans changed as the supercontinent split up and separated which gave us the Europeans, Africans, Asian.

Example. The phenotypes of African negroes are very distinct and unique to Africans.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks (Africans) and Non-Blacks(Others)

Blacks (Africans) have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks (Africans) have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience"s sake). The Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, The average Bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, And the highly cultivated, Well fed, Well cared for, Partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, Achievement, And behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, Crime, Mortality, And broken homes on one side " and education, Wealth, Human accomplishment, Long life and stable homes on the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, A country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than animals and other humans
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/9/2019 5:53:00 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Imagine if the bible had not kept records of ham and his descendants? Though there are directions in nature, It was the bible that gave man the clues of even where to look.

One of the things most people don't know, Is just how long ago Noah was. They think Noah was about 6, 000 years ago, But it is clear Noah was much older than that.

So while they are talking about migrations between 2 and 10 thousand years ago, The actual time is much older. People today think it's no big deal that the bible pointed to Africa as the source of all humans on earth because they grew up with the out of Africa idea. But before science confirmed it, The out of Africa was novel and scary. And the racist fought against mightily.

But as always, Each new discovery of science only makes the bible more plausible. As the science of biogenetics matured, It became clearer and clearer that the bible could not be this correct just by coincidence.

It is clear though that African slavery did not match the curse.

First, The only descendants of Canaan who match the "servants of servants" are the branch of Seba. There are other descendants of Canaan who were enslaved from time to time in places, But none were completely enslaved as the branch of Seba was.

For example, When God told Israel they would be enslaved by Egypt, The entire country of Israel was taken into Egypt. All of them were enslaved in Egypt.

So the only descendants that match the "servant of servants" part of the curse is the Seba branch of the Canaan line. The caste system in India made slaves within the slave system. An Indian enslaved by the Arabs, Could himself have a dalit slave.

In one of the testimonials in "Indians Speak On India", The speaker tells us that even today in India, Any higher caste person can order a dalit to remove the corpse of say, A dead animal, And the dalit would be forced under threat of bodily harm, To obey.

The second part of the curse is, That the cursed line would be slaves of both the descendants of Shem and Japheth. Again, The only descendants of Canaan who qualify are the Seba line. No other line out of Canaan fits this condition. Africans don't.

So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?

The answer is in ancient history. Ancient writings mention Sabeans (Sabae) as the people who settled India. Some of the ancient accounts of India also mention names associated with the Cush line, Like rajputs being a combination word of raj, Which is Indian, And phut, Which is African.

As anthropologists tracked the movements of ancient peoples, It became clear that the Sabaens were ancestors of the first people to inhabit India.

And the correctness of the bible becomes plain. The curse of Canaan could only be. . . . .
1. On the actual descendants of Canaan
2. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants and
3. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.
4. On the descendants of Canaan who entire line became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.

The only population fitting all 4 requirements of the curse is the Seba line that became India. And history shows India was totally enslaved for 17 centuries. The entire country.

Then after science confirms that Indians are descendants of Africans, The case becomes airtight.

The curse was on Indians.

In my next post, I address the question that occurs to anyone reading the account of the curse, Why were the descendants of Canaan cursed and not Ham himself?
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/9/2019 9:30:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Imagine if the bible had not kept records of ham and his descendants? Though there are directions in nature, It was the bible that gave man the clues of even where to look.

One of the things most people don't know, Is just how long ago Noah was. They think Noah was about 6, 000 years ago, But it is clear Noah was much older than that.
The bible geneology from Adam to Jesus is detailed in the bible.

The geneology in the Bible from Jesus to Adam adds up to 4000 years.

TIME FROM ADAM TO JESUS

Adam to Abraham = 1948 yrs
Abraham to Egypt = 290 yrs

From Egypt to Moses: (X) Let X = 63 63 yrs

X = (Kohath to Amram to Moses)

Moses to the Exodus = 80 yrs
Exodus to death Joshua = 70 yrs
Judges to Samuel = 450 yrs (Acts 13:20)
Kings of Judah = 513 yrs
Babylonian Captivity = 586 B. C. E.
--
Adam to Jesus 4000 yrs

So while they are talking about migrations between 2 and 10 thousand years ago, The actual time is much older. People today think it's no big deal that the bible pointed to Africa as the source of all humans on earth because they grew up with the out of Africa idea. But before science confirmed it, The out of Africa was novel and scary. And the racist fought against mightily.

The out of Africa theory was popular when some of the oldest fossils were found in Africa. But Africa was the only place they were looking for fossils. But now they are finding older fossils in China, The Middle East and Asia that challenge the old out of Africa Theory.
The only out of Africa theory that has support is the flow of African slaves out of Africa to Arab countries for 1, 300 years and then to the Americas and Europe for another 4 centuries. The migration of slaves were coerced and not voluntary.

The fossil that rewrites human history: 260, 000-year-old Chinese skull suggests we descend from ASIAN as well as African ancestors
Now we are finally able to separate the dumb ones that stayed in Africa from the smart ones that left Asia.

Try accounting for the dark skin and negroid appearance only found among Africans. Then there is the genetically discovered low IQ among Africans. Now top that with the subhuman species Homo Naledi that is traced to negroid ancestors. Africans have no record of sea faring skills, No written script, No navigational concepts. They were simply hunters living in a jungle culture. Africa was lush with wild life and vegetation. The only reason there was any out of Africa migration was the Arab slave trade and later the European slave trade.
Europeans came up with the Neanderthals to explain their lineage. Asians have their own parallel evolution.
We are not related brother.

No one is buying the out of Africa theory today. Africans living in Africa haven't changed much. And those living out of Africa have the highest school drop out rates, 30% of Africans are in prison, 30% of Africans are inemployed. The rest are either drug dealers or pimps with some exceptions. All this proves Africans are genetically different with lower IQ than non Africans and their dark skin and negroid appearance can be traced back to subhuman species now established as African ancestors.

I just proved to you the African race has not evolved. They are basically where they were when they started out. Low IQ, Jungle culture. Whereas all other races evolved and show little resemblance to dark skinned negroid appearance of subhuman species.
These links were artificially established to explain the evolution of race. But it was an over simplistic view.

But as always, Each new discovery of science only makes the bible more plausible. As the science of biogenetics matured, It became clearer and clearer that the bible could not be this correct just by coincidence.
It is science that relegated the bible to fables because it could not survive scientific scrutiny.
Bibles are not taught in schools because it does not meet the minimum educational standards required. You don't get any math or science credits for studying thei bible.

It is clear though that African slavery did not match the curse.
Africans were owned and traded as slaves by Arabs, Romans, Portugues and Christians throughout African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the world. 20 million African slaves were shipped out from Ghana alone. Nigger that's African history.

First, The only descendants of Canaan who match the "servants of servants" are the branch of Seba. There are other descendants of Canaan who were enslaved from time to time in places, But none were completely enslaved as the branch of Seba was.

The Canaanites are the descendants of Canaan. They settled in the land of Canaanites against the warnings of Ham. The Canaanites were destroyed by Joshua in the Bible.

For example, When God told Israel they would be enslaved by Egypt, The entire country of Israel was taken into Egypt. All of them were enslaved in Egypt.
Genesis 15:13 Then the Lord said to him(Abraham), "Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated there.
God determined his long they would be enslaved.

So the only descendants that match the "servant of servants" part of the curse is the Seba branch of the Canaan line. The caste system in India made slaves within the slave system. An Indian enslaved by the Arabs, Could himself have a dalit slave.

Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

In one of the testimonials in "Indians Speak On India", The speaker tells us that even today in India, Any higher caste person can order a dalit to remove the corpse of say, A dead animal, And the dalit would be forced under threat of bodily harm, To obey.
Get an education, Nigger. Dalits are untouchable low caste and not slaves.

The second part of the curse is, That the cursed line would be slaves of both the descendants of Shem and Japheth. Again, The only descendants of Canaan who qualify are the Seba line. No other line out of Canaan fits this condition. Africans don't.
Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?
Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Seba was the son of Cush.

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
The descendants of Seba are Ethiopians.
The name of a country and nation (Isa. 43:3; 45:14) mentioned along with Egypt and Ethiopia, And therefore probably in north-eastern Africa.

In Genesis 10:7, Their ancestor is said to be a son of Cush, The progenitor of the Ethiopians. In Isaiah 43:3 and Psalm 72:10, Seba is mentioned as a distant and wealthy country; in the former passage, It is connected with Egypt and Ethiopia; and Meroe was one of the most important commercial cities of interior Africa. These Sabeans are described by Herodotus as men of uncommon size. Compare Isaiah 45:14. A branch of this family, It is thought, Located themselves near the head of the Persian Gulf; and the Sabeans mentioned in Job 1:15 were probably Cushites.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/9/2019 10:17:05 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

The second part of the curse is, That the cursed line would be slaves of both the descendants of Shem and Japheth. Again, The only descendants of Canaan who qualify are the Seba line. No other line out of Canaan fits this condition. Africans don't.

Canaanites

Canaan, As well as his descendants, Followed in the sinful way of their father. The punishment was placed upon the descendants of Canaan-the Canaanites. These are the people who were driven out of the Promised Land by the children of Israel. Consequently, They would be in servitude to the descendants of Shem and Japeth. Because the descendants of Canaan lived corrupt lives, Their judgment was righteous. When the children of Israel entered the land of Promise they saw the detestable things that the descendants of Canaan were doing. God blessed Israel and cursed the Canaanites because their practices were similar to their father Ham.

Historical Fulfillment

History records God's promises were fulfilled. The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.
Indians are Indo European/Aryans the descendants of Japheth. Noah only cursed the Canaanites the descendants of Canaan the son of Ham. Read your bible you low IQ nigger.

Where are the Canaanites today? Not in India. Lol?

Why did Ham's son Canaan leave Africa when Ham and his other sons settled in African countries?
4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

And Ham divided amongst his sons, And the first portion came forth for Cush towards the east(Sudan, Ethiopia), And to the west of him for Mizraim(Egypt), And to the west of him for Put(Lybia), And to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea for Canaan.
Jubilees 9:1
And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt, That it was very good, And he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea, And he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, Eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham, His father, And Cush and Mizraim his brothers said unto him: 'Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, And which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, Thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, And by sedition will thy children fall, And thou shalt be rooted out for ever. Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot. Cursed art thou, And cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, By the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, And in the presence of Noah our father. ' But he did not hearken unto them, And dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, He and his sons until this day. And for this reason that land is named Canaan. ;"Jubilees 10:29-34.

So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?
Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Seba was the son of Cush.

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
The descendants of Seba are Ethiopians.
The name of a country and nation (Isa. 43:3; 45:14) mentioned along with Egypt and Ethiopia, And therefore probably in north-eastern Africa.

In Genesis 10:7, Their ancestor is said to be a son of Cush, The progenitor of the Ethiopians. In Isaiah 43:3 and Psalm 72:10, Seba is mentioned as a distant and wealthy country; in the former passage, It is connected with Egypt and Ethiopia; and Meroe was one of the most important commercial cities of interior Africa. These Sabeans are described by Herodotus as men of uncommon size. Compare Isaiah 45:14. A branch of this family, It is thought, Located themselves near the head of the Persian Gulf; and the Sabeans mentioned in Job 1:15 were probably Cushites.

The answer is in ancient history. Ancient writings mention Sabeans (Sabae) as the people who settled India. Some of the ancient accounts of India also mention names associated with the Cush line, Like rajputs being a combination word of raj, Which is Indian, And phut, Which is African.
Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Seba was the son of Cush.

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
The descendants of Seba are Ethiopians.

Indians are not Ethiopians. Ethiopians never left Africa, Only Canaan did. The Canaanites were slaughtered by Joshua which stopped the migration of Africans out of Africa.

As anthropologists tracked the movements of ancient peoples, It became clear that the Sabaens were ancestors of the first people to inhabit India.

Sabaens were never India. The Sabeans lived in the land of Sheba, Which archeology suggests was a Semitic trading state that existed for 1, 000 years in the area that is now Yemen. The capital of Sheba was called Marib (or Ma"rib), And the kingdom existed from 1200 BC to AD 275, Trading primarily in spices. The land of the Sabeans was eventually destroyed as a result of civil war.
The next two biblical events involving the Sabeans are prophecies by Isaiah and Joel. Isaiah prophesies about Israel"s eventual victory over three cultures: the Egyptians, The Cushites, And the Sabeans. Isaiah 45:14. , Joel 3:4"8.

And the correctness of the bible becomes plain. The curse of Canaan could only be. . . . .
1. On the actual descendants of Canaan
Descendants if Canaan were Africans.

2. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants and
The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.

3. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.
The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14.

4. On the descendants of Canaan who entire line became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.
Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.

The only population fitting all 4 requirements of the curse is the Seba line that became India. And history shows India was totally enslaved for 17 centuries. The entire country.

African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the World. 20 million African slaves were shipped out of Ghana alone.
No record of Indian slavery.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/10/2019 12:24:48 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
I forgot to give the reference for the account. It begins in Genesis chapter 6, And goes on to chapter 13. The more in depth story about the offspring of Canaan is at other places and I will reference those when the time comes.

Just remember that there is no time scale given in the bible and many times, Only sons pertinent to the main story line of Israel's redemption are mentioned, So counting generations is an inaccurate way to try to time the bible.

But notice two things, The land settled by the descendants of Canaan is as early as Gen 12 promised to Abraham and his descendants. From God's POV, The Canaanites had already lost their possession. The second thing is the sin of Lots children and the connection to Sodom and Gomorrah.

It all ties in to why the children of Canaan were cursed.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/10/2019 4:09:24 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
I forgot to give the reference for the account. It begins in Genesis chapter 6, And goes on to chapter 13. The more in depth story about the offspring of Canaan is at other places and I will reference those when the time comes.

Just remember that there is no time scale given in the bible and many times, Only sons pertinent to the main story line of Israel's redemption are mentioned, So counting generations is an inaccurate way to try to time the bible.

But notice two things, The land settled by the descendants of Canaan is as early as Gen 12 promised to Abraham and his descendants. From God's POV, The Canaanites had already lost their possession. The second thing is the sin of Lots children and the connection to Sodom and Gomorrah.

It all ties in to why the children of Canaan were cursed.

They were Canaanites (Africans) as well.

It all ties in to why the children of Canaan were cursed.
And the children of Canaan were Africans. As were the other sons of Ham.
Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations.
Only Ham's children were the first Africans.
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

Even though the Indian valley was relatively far away from Africa, The descendants of Cush bypassed nearer places for there. It must have been a beautiful location back then, But looking at it now, The filth and degradation are startling. And that too will tie in to the curse.

The descendants of Cush were Africans. Genesis 10 tells us the descendants of Cush were Ethiopians. The Indus valley is in Pakistan and not India. That is why no Ethiopians are found in India.

Even the Greek historian Herodotus wrote about the Indus region and Sindh. Both are in Pakistan and not India.

Read Herodotus's account.
According to Herodotus 4. 44, Scylax of Caryanda, A Greek explorer sailed down the length of the Indus in the service of Darius. Hecataeus of Miletus, Around 500 BC, Wrote about the geography and peoples of India. The Greek pysician Ctesias also wrote about India. Most of these works have not survived in their original form but fragments are known through transmission by later writers. Not only individual Greeks, But also large groups of Greeks were forced to settle in Bactria (northern Afghanistan), Who must have had prolonged contact with Indians. Herodotus's account is believed to be based on these accounts. [1]

The Greeks (or Persians) were not aware of the geography of India (or Asia in general) east of the Indus basin. Herodotus in 4. 40 is explicit about India being on the eastern fringe of the inhabitable world,

"As far as India, Asia is an inhabited land; but thereafter, All to the east is desolation, Nor can anyone say what kind of land is there. " (trans. A. D. Godley 1920)

Even Alexandar the Great could not penetrate into India and was stopped at the northern boders. This is why so little was known about the rest of India. Invading armies were all stopped at the northern borders.


The curse of Ham's son Canaan.

Canaanites

Canaan, As well as his descendants, Followed in the sinful way of their father. The punishment was placed upon the descendants of Canaan-the Canaanites. These are the people who were driven out of the Promised Land by the children of Israel. Consequently, They would be in servitude to the descendants of Shem and Japeth. Because the descendants of Canaan lived corrupt lives, Their judgment was righteous. When the children of Israel entered the land of Promise they saw the detestable things that the descendants of Canaan were doing. God blessed Israel and cursed the Canaanites because their practices were similar to their father Ham.

<em!Historical Fulfillment

History records God's promises were fulfilled. The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.
Indians are Indo European/Aryans the descendants of Japheth. Noah only cursed the Canaanites the descendants of Canaan the son of Ham. Read your bible you low IQ nigger.

Where are the Canaanites today? Not in India. Lol?

Why did Ham's son Canaan leave Africa when Ham and his other sons settled in African countries?
4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

And Ham divided amongst his sons, And the first portion came forth for Cush towards the east(Sudan, Ethiopia), And to the west of him for Mizraim(Egypt), And to the west of him for Put(Lybia), And to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea for Canaan.
Jubilees 9:1
And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt, That it was very good, And he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea, And he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, Eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham, His father, And Cush and Mizraim his brothers said unto him: 'Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, And which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, Thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, And by sedition will thy children fall, And thou shalt be rooted out for ever. Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot. Cursed art thou, And cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, By the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, And in the presence of Noah our father. ' But he did not hearken unto them, And dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, He and his sons until this day. And for this reason that land is named Canaan. ;"Jubilees 10:29-34.


So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?

Read you bible, Nigger. Seba is not a descendant of Canaan.
Genesis 10:7 The sons of Cush:
Seba, Havilah, Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteka.
The sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.

Seba was the son of Cush.

The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham and father of Nimrod. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia.
The descendants of Seba are Ethiopians.
The name of a country and nation (Isa. 43:3; 45:14) mentioned along with Egypt and Ethiopia, And therefore probably in north-eastern Africa.

In Genesis 10:7, Their ancestor is said to be a son of Cush, The progenitor of the Ethiopians. In Isaiah 43:3 and Psalm 72:10, Seba is mentioned as a distant and wealthy country; in the former passage, It is connected with Egypt and Ethiopia; and Meroe was one of the most important commercial cities of interior Africa. These Sabeans are described by Herodotus as men of uncommon size. Compare Isaiah 45:14. A branch of this family, It is thought, Located themselves near the head of the Persian Gulf; and the Sabeans mentioned in Job 1:15 were probably Cushites.

Sabaens were never India. The Sabeans lived in the land of Sheba, Which archeology suggests was a Semitic trading state that existed for 1, 000 years in the area that is now Yemen. The capital of Sheba was called Marib (or Ma"rib), And the kingdom existed from 1200 BC to AD 275, Trading primarily in spices. The land of the Sabeans was eventually destroyed as a result of civil war.
The next two biblical events involving the Sabeans are prophecies by Isaiah and Joel. Isaiah prophesies about Israel"s eventual victory over three cultures: the Egyptians, The Cushites, And the Sabeans.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 2:57:37 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Here it is. This will take several posts, But the result will open your eyes. Remember now,

1. We showed by science that it was blacks who settled and populated India originally.
2. We showed that the Bible agrees that it was blacks who are the the ancestors of Indians.
3. We showed that only Indian slavery fulfills all the details of the curse of Ham.

Now we're on to the question, "why were the descendants of Canaan cursed instead of Ham? " As the bible says, It has to do with idolatry and incest. But I have to give you the background for you to get the complete picture.

https://www. Google. Com/amp/s/blog. Ipleaders. In/incest-legality/amp/

Is incest a crime in India?

No. Incest is nowhere defined in the penal provisions of India. Therefore, If individuals are involved in incest, They cannot be punished for a crime of incest, Although, The may be punished for any other legal ground such as adultery or sodomy or rape. Incest is, The crime of sexual relations or marriage taking place between a male and female who are so closely linked by blood or affinity that law prohibits such activity. When anyone enters into an incestuous relationship willingly, It is not an offence, Per se the penal provision of India. Thus, There is no offence called incest as per the Indian Penal Code.

Imagine a society with no law prohibiting incest. India is such a country.

Now imagine a country whose religion worships "gods" who perform incest. Hinduism is such a religion.

It is Hindus themselves who brag about their "gods" high libido. And accounts of incest can be found in their "holy book" where their "gods" had incestuous relations with their own sisters, And raped wives of other men.

The story in Noah mirrors the story about Lot. Next we will read the story of Lot and see how it ties in with the story of Noah, And why the curse that condemned all Indians to slavery was due to the nasty behavior of Indians.

WARNING: This is Hinduism we're talking about, So filthy depictions of incest, Rape, And incest will sadly be necessary.

On to Lot next, But keep the 3 points listed above in memory. If you have low tolerance for filth, Don't read the next post, And certainly, Never visit India.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 9:59:18 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

Read the Bible nigger. The curse of Ham condemned Africans to slavery.
Noah had 3 sons Shem, Japheth and Ham. Noah only cursed Ham and his children and Ham's children were destined to be slaves to Shem and Japheth and their descendants. (Genesis 9)

Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations.
Only Ham's children were the first Africans.
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

As you can see those are African countries. Both the curse and hot sun changed the genetics of Hams descendant. This gave rise to the African race and phenotypes.

Noah's sons Shem and Japheth started the other nations.

2. Five Sons of Shem (see map below):
1. Elam (Arabia)
2. Asshur (Assyria)
3. Lud (Lydians)
4. Aram (Aramaic, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Syria)
5. Arphaxad (From which Abraham descended)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Shem or his descendants were never in Africa.

3. Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Now you know why the curse of Ham only condemned Africans who were the descendants of Hams children who built the African nations.
Noah's curse and its fulfillment.

Canaanites

Canaan, As well as his descendants, Followed in the sinful way of their father. The punishment was placed upon the descendants of Canaan-the Canaanites. These are the people who were driven out of the Promised Land by the children of Israel. Consequently, They would be in servitude to the descendants of Shem and Japeth. Because the descendants of Canaan lived corrupt lives, Their judgment was righteous. When the children of Israel entered the land of Promise they saw the detestable things that the descendants of Canaan were doing. God blessed Israel and cursed the Canaanites because their practices were similar to their father Ham.

Historical Fulfillment

History records God's promises were fulfilled. The Canaanites were defeated and placed into slavery by the eastern kings Genesis 14. Later in the history of Israel, Other descendants of Canaan, Known as the Gibeonites, Were made wood choppers and water carriers under Joshua. Thus the predictions of Noah that Canaan's descendants would serve Shem's descendants were literally fulfilled and recorded in the Old Testament.
Indians are Indo European/Aryans the descendants of Japheth. Noah only cursed the Canaanites the descendants of Canaan the son of Ham. Read your bible you low IQ nigger.

Where are the Canaanites today? Not in India. Lol?
Canaan was the name of a large and prosperous ancient country (at times independent, At others a tributary to Egypt) located in the Levant region of present-day Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, And Israel. It was also known as Phoenicia.

Why did Ham's son Canaan leave Africa when Ham and his other sons settled in African countries?
4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

And Ham divided amongst his sons, And the first portion came forth for Cush towards the east(Sudan, Ethiopia), And to the west of him for Mizraim(Egypt), And to the west of him for Put(Lybia), And to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea for Canaan.
Jubilees 9:1
And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt, That it was very good, And he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea, And he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, Eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham, His father, And Cush and Mizraim his brothers said unto him: 'Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, And which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, Thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, And by sedition will thy children fall, And thou shalt be rooted out for ever. Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot. Cursed art thou, And cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, By the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, And in the presence of Noah our father. ' But he did not hearken unto them, And dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, He and his sons until this day. And for this reason that land is named Canaan. R32;"Jubilees 10:29-34.

The bible does not tell us all the humans descended from Africa. The Bible tells us all the humans descended from Noah after the flood and his children Shem, Japheth and Ham started the nations each carving out separate countries for their descendants.
Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

Five Sons of Shem
1. Elam (Arabia)
2. Asshur (Assyria)
3. Lud (Lydians)
4. Aram (Aramaic, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Syria)
5. Arphaxad (From which Abraham descended)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Shem or his descendants were never in Africa.

3. Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Now you know why the curse of Ham only condemned Africans who were the descendants of Hams children who built the African nations.
Africans were owned and traded as slaves by the Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout their African history.

The Bible does not tell us Noah and all his children started out in Africa. It tells us only Ham and his children were the first Africans.
So the bible rebuts the Out of Africa Theory as the origins of humans.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/11/2019 11:15:56 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Here it is. This will take several posts, But the result will open your eyes. Remember now,

1. We showed by science that it was blacks who settled and populated India originally.
2. We showed that the Bible agrees that it was blacks who are the the ancestors of Indians.
3. We showed that only Indian slavery fulfills all the details of the curse of Ham.

Now we're on to the question, "why were the descendants of Canaan cursed instead of Ham? " As the bible says, It has to do with idolatry and incest. But I have to give you the background for you to get the complete picture.

https://www. Google. Com/amp/s/blog. Ipleaders. In/incest-legality/amp/

Is incest a crime in India?

No. Incest is nowhere defined in the penal provisions of India. Therefore, If individuals are involved in incest, They cannot be punished for a crime of incest, Although, The may be punished for any other legal ground such as adultery or sodomy or rape. Incest is, The crime of sexual relations or marriage taking place between a male and female who are so closely linked by blood or affinity that law prohibits such activity. When anyone enters into an incestuous relationship willingly, It is not an offence, Per se the penal provision of India. Thus, There is no offence called incest as per the Indian Penal Code.

Imagine a society with no law prohibiting incest. India is such a country.

Now imagine a country whose religion worships "gods" who perform incest. Hinduism is such a religion.

It is Hindus themselves who brag about their "gods" high libido. And accounts of incest can be found in their "holy book" where their "gods" had incestuous relations with their own sisters, And raped wives of other men.

The story in Noah mirrors the story about Lot. Next we will read the story of Lot and see how it ties in with the story of Noah, And why the curse that condemned all Indians to slavery was due to the nasty behavior of Indians.

WARNING: This is Hinduism we're talking about, So filthy depictions of incest, Rape, And incest will sadly be necessary.

On to Lot next, But keep the 3 points listed above in memory. If you have low tolerance for filth, Don't read the next post, And certainly, Never visit India.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 1:01:59 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Here it is. This will take several posts, But the result will open your eyes. Remember now,

1. We showed by science that it was blacks who settled and populated India originally.
2. We showed that the Bible agrees that it was blacks who are the the ancestors of Indians.
3. We showed that only Indian slavery fulfills all the details of the curse of Ham.

Now we're on to the question, "why were the descendants of Canaan cursed instead of Ham? " As the bible says, It has to do with idolatry and incest. But I have to give you the background for you to get the complete picture.

https://www. Google. Com/amp/s/blog. Ipleaders. In/incest-legality/amp/


The only black still trying to get out of Africa is Ethang5. But no one wants a black nigger delivery mule.

The out of Africa theory was popular when some of the oldest fossils were found in Africa. But Africa was the only place they were looking for fossils. But now they are finding older fossils in China, The Middle East and Asia that challenge the old out of Africa Theory.
The only out of Africa theory that has support is the flow of African slaves out of Africa to Arab countries for 1, 300 years and then to the Americas and Europe for another 4 centuries. The migration of slaves were coerced and not voluntary.

The fossil that rewrites human history: 260, 000-year-old Chinese skull suggests we descend from ASIAN as well as African ancestors
Now we are finally able to separate the dumb ones that stayed in Africa from the smart ones that left Asia.

Try accounting for the dark skin and negroid appearance only found among Africans. Then there is the genetically discovered low IQ among Africans. Now top that with the subhuman species Homo Naledi that is traced to negroid ancestors. Africans have no record of sea faring skills, No written script, No navigational concepts. They were simply hunters living in a jungle culture. Africa was lush with wild life and vegetation. The only reason there was any out of Africa migration was the Arab slave trade and later the European slave trade.
Europeans came up with the Neanderthals to explain their lineage. Asians have their own parallel evolution. Asians even ate the brain of monkeys which was later proven to be European and African common ancestors according to Darwin in his The descent of Man.
We are not related brother.

No one is buying the out of Africa theory today. Africans living in Africa haven't changed much. And those living out of Africa have the highest school drop out rates, 30% of Africans are in prison, 30% of Africans are inemployed. The rest are either drug dealers or pimps with some exceptions. All this proves Africans are genetically different with lower IQ than non Africans and their dark skin and negroid appearance can be traced back to subhuman species now established as African ancestors.
Even interracial marriages cannot wean out the negroid because negroid genes are dominant genes. It puts back the jungle instincts in every negroid generation.

I just proved to you the African race has not evolved. They are basically where they were when they started out. Low IQ, Jungle culture. Whereas all other races evolved and show little resemblance to dark skinned negroid appearance of subhuman species.
These links were artificially established to explain the evolution of race. But it was an over simplistic view.

We don't see a similar pattern of migration with animals and many are region specific.
There is even an out of Australia theory and an out of Israel theory. The fact the rest of the world didn't turn out like Africans makes it obvious we did not all start out as Africans.

If you take the Genesis account. The garden of Eden was not in Africa. The Jews being the diect descendants of Adam and Eve were not Africans. In fact Christians trace the lineage of Africans to Ham.

The First Race: Out-of-*Australia, Not Africa!
http://nationalunitygovernment. Org/content/first-race-out-australia-not-africa-0

Take it from the experts. The only Africans out of Africa were slaves. Their negroid appearance and dark skin was unknown to the free world.
After scientists discovered Africans had lower IQ than non Africans. The out of Africa theory lost credibility because dumb people are only found in Africa. Ancient civilizations were far more advanced than even modern Africa today. Nothing good ever came out of Africa.
----

How and why Africans got out of Africa which the Out of Africa Theory ignored.

Northern Africa
Chattel slavery had been legal and widespread throughout North Africa when the region was controlled by the Roman Empire (145 BC " ca. 430 AD and by the Eastern Romans from 533 to 695). A slave trade bringing Saharans through the desert to North Africa, Which existed in Roman times, Continued and documentary evidence in the Nile Valley shows it to have been regulated there by treaty. [8] Chattel slavery persisted after the fall of the Roman empire in the largely Christian communities of the region. After the Islamic expansion into most of the region, The practices continued and eventually, The chattel form of slavery spread to major societies on the southern end of the Sahara (such as Mali, Songhai, And Ghana). [1]
The medieval slave trade in Europe was mainly to the East and South: the Christian Byzantine Empire and the Muslim World were the destinations, Central and Eastern Europe an important source of slaves. [19] Slavery in medieval Europe was so widespread that the Roman Catholic Church repeatedly prohibited it"or at least the export of Christian slaves to non-Christian lands was prohibited at, For example, The Council of Koblenz in 922, The Council of London in 1102, And the Council of Armagh in 1171. Because of religious constraints, The slave trade was carried out in parts of Europe by Iberian Jews (known as Radhanites) who were able to transfer slaves from pagan Central Europe through Christian Western Europe to Muslim countries in Al-Andalus and Africa. [20]

The Arab slave trade was the intersection of slavery and tradein the Arab world, Mainly in Western Asia, North Africa, East Africa and Europe. [1] This barter occurred chiefly between the medieval era and the early 20th century. The trade was conducted through slave markets in these areas, With the slaves captured mostly from Africa's interior[2] and Southern Europe.

The Atlantic slave trade or transatlantic slave tradeinvolved the transportation by slave traders of enslaved African people, Mainly to the Americas. The slave trade regularly used the triangular trade route and its Middle Passage, And existed from the 16th to the 19th centuries. The vast majority of those who were enslaved and transported in the transatlantic slave trade were people from central and western Africa, Who had been sold by other West Africans to Western European slave traders (with a small number being captured directly by the slave traders in coastal raids), Who brought them to the Americas. [1] The South Atlantic and Caribbean economies especially were dependent on the supply of secure labour for the production of commodity crops, Making goods and clothing to sell in Europe. This was crucial to those western European countries which, In the late 17th and 18th centuries, Were vying with each other to create overseas empires.

Now look at African migration history. Africans were taken out of Africa and made to work as slaves for over 1, 700 years. Other races migrated to explore new worlds to conquer and build. But Africans were exclusively picked to serve as slaves by Arabs, Brazil, Europe and America. Africa never made any contribution to science or technology but remained as slaves until slavery was abolished. Nothing good ever came out of Africa.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 4,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 12:59:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
EThang5, Harikrisk is plagiarizing thought. These ideas come here. FYI

https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade
Turn the light of the third eye and live (Ezekiel 18)
https://www.debate.org...
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 3:09:44 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:

EThang5, Harikrisk is plagiarizing thought. These ideas come from here. FYI

https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade

Thanks Anon, But we know that the moron plagiarizes. His English is so poor, We can instantly tell when he is cutting and pasting. He will accept any shoddy "research" that supports his imbecile racism.

The moron is not interested in discussion. He knows he will lose any point he tries to discuss. So he spams, Looking for any attention he can get.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 3:29:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
EThang5, Harikrisk is plagiarizing thought. These ideas come here. FYI

https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade

The Trans Atlantic Slave Trade happened before our time. We have to rely on history and other sources to gives us the detals. That is not plagiarizing. That is getting to the facts. Unlike you who claims prophets are talking to you. You are a pathological liar and mentally ill.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 3:36:32 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
anonthesmallone wrote:

EThang5, Harikrisk is plagiarizing thought. These ideas come from here. FYI

https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade

Thanks Anon, But we know that the moron plagiarizes. His English is so poor, We can instantly tell when he is cutting and pasting. He will accept any shoddy "research" that supports his imbecile racism.

The moron is not interested in discussion. He knows he will lose any point he tries to discuss. So he spams, Looking for any attention he can get.

The curse of Ham condemned Africans to slavery.
African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians throughout African history. Ghana Africa was the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade Centre of the world. Over 20 million African slaves were shipped out of Ghana Africs alone.

Read your confession.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang said: For His Majesty King Jesus? Full time slave here moron. Jesus has my all.
Ethang is a full time slave.

African phenotypes are uniquely African and only seen in African negroids.

Phenotypic Variations Between Blacks (Africans) and Non-Blacks(Others)

Blacks (Africans) have wide noses, Kinky hair, Black skin, High waist-to-hip ratios, Prognathic jaws, Long arms, And soulless, Vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks (Africans) have the lowest IQ in the world (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned Australian aborigines for convenience"s sake). The Bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, The average Bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, And the highly cultivated, Well fed, Well cared for, Partially White African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, Achievement, And behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, Crime, Mortality, And broken homes on one side " and education, Wealth, Human accomplishment, Long life and stable homes on the other. According to IQ and the Wealth of Nations, A country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, And it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.

The curse of Ham was clearly pointing to African slavery.
Genesis 9:25 The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers. "


Meet some Indians.
https://youtu. Be/NNbcQ5TnbtI
https://youtu. Be/6LvTREN4REI
https://youtu. Be/r7wVCj12I7o

Meet some Africans.
https://youtu. Be/1X2NRNVujhA
https://youtu. Be/2TPFBI2sYik
https://youtu. Be/_KytZItUQQk
anonthesmallone
Posts: 4,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 4:44:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish, Do you even know what plagiarism is? I wonder sometimes. . .
Turn the light of the third eye and live (Ezekiel 18)
https://www.debate.org...
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 5:06:47 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
anonthesmallone wrote:
Harikrish, Do you even know what plagiarism is? I wonder sometimes. . .

Stop wondering and start dealing with your mental illness that is also causing your constipation.

Anon said: After being a happy little child, I became mentally ill by the world matrix and got lost in my thoughts, Feelings, And deeds. The event was so traumatic on me when I was 17,

It took me 43 years to finally make sense of the Bible. Then I have to deal with people like Harikrish, Who is not who he claims to be, Chasing me around and lying to discredit me as a person. His purpose on the board is to create confusion and put other people down.

I spent 40 years getting the correct Biblical paradigms in place, And then I entered the first heaven when I was 57. I did not stand on the sea of glass until I was age 60 about 5 months ago. . For example, I know about Paul's writing about God is not the author of confusion but I said God "causes" the confusion. The words author and causes are two different words.

Anon wrote: God gave me the evidence I needed to reveal I am the reincarnated Noah. This is why I believe what I do. I am not an idiot dreamer. I stand on PHYSICAL facts and evidence. For example, When I first came in here, I did not poop for 17 days. God removed the poop from my intestines supernaturally. 17=1+7=8 8=translation. I had no pain or discomfort. In fact, I liked not going to the bathroom but still eating like a pig. I cannot stop what God wants to do with me. This is only one example of physical evidence God has given me to keep walking in the light.

Anon was also reincarnated as Noah in his past 3 lives. But he did not know he was Noah even though his constipation was torturing him. He called the area of his pain a hell hole.

Anon wrote: I have had at least three past lives to serve God. I was a man tortured to death for my beliefs in the 16th century, But I did not know I was Noah. Everyone is clueless in Sheol who they were. I did not want to come back to this hell hole planet, But here I am because I love Yahweh and He asked me to come back; therefore, I did. We do not need to come back to earth and suffer death over and over if we do not want to. We can just wait for the resurrection and work on the Golden Rule in Sheol.

So why was it different this time.

Anon explains: I am the reincarnated Noah. That is what the Lord told me while standing in front of him on the sea of glass in heaven.
Harikrish, I am not doing these posts, But the Lord is. He is the one that glorifies Himself on the outside until it was time to go forward as a secret weapon in the Lord's hands. I have personally met reincarnated Isaac and John the Baptist. I have two prophets working with me that hear the audible voice of Yahweh daily to correct me if I need it. The Lord said I will meet reincarnated Abraham and Jacob in the future.

I stand by my beliefs. I stepped unto the sea of glass in May, And after that, I only get corrected by the prophets about once every two months. The sea of glass is quite an effective crystal ball in ALL OF US that is activated by repentance and faith in Yahweh by using the VERY simple rainbow covenant made to Abraham and all the prophets who saw the rainbow in the sky before Noah.


You wrote: I have had at least three past lives to serve God. I was a man tortured to death for my beliefs in the 16th century, But I did not know I was Noah. Everyone is clueless in Sheol who they were. I did not want to come back to this hell hole planet, But here I am because I love Yahweh and He asked me to come back; therefore, I did. We do not need to come back to earth and suffer death over and over if we do not want to. We can just wait for the resurrection and work on the Golden Rule in Sheol.
anonthesmallone
Posts: 4,254
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 6:41:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
When did the first black man with the current phenotype appear on the planet? It was in Africa, According to you, But when? . . .
Turn the light of the third eye and live (Ezekiel 18)
https://www.debate.org...
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 8:08:23 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Harikrish wrote:
anonthesmallone wrote:

EThang5, Harikrisk is plagiarizing thought. These ideas come here. FYI

https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade

The Trans Atlantic Slave Trade happened before our time. We have to rely on history and other sources to gives us the detals. That is not plagiarizing. That is getting to the facts. Unlike you who claims prophets are talking to you. You are a pathological liar and mentally ill.

Yet Anon doesn't dodge any questions you ask him. He answers. You dance like cheap crook, Unable to answer questions because your position is stupid.

And posting the work of others without credit is plagiarizing you deceitful moron.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/12/2019 8:19:26 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Harikrish wrote:
anonthesmallone wrote:

EThang5, Harikrisk is plagiarizing thought. These ideas come here. FYI

https://en. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade

The Trans Atlantic Slave Trade happened before our time. We have to rely on history and other sources to gives us the detals. That is not plagiarizing. That is getting to the facts. Unlike you who claims prophets are talking to you. You are a pathological liar and mentally ill.

Yet Anon doesn't dodge any questions you ask him. He answers. You dance like cheap crook, Unable to answer questions because your position is stupid.

And posting the work of others without credit is plagiarizing you deceitful moron.

The nigger Ethang5 is burning.
Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?

Then he went on to disparage his country and peope. Ghanian Africans.

Ethang's own confessions of life in Ghana Africa and the conditions of his people are matters of deep concern. He has turned bitter and become the typical self loathing African. He even publicly denounces his race and said openly he is not a proud African. Has Ethang lost you sense of national identity and developed a contempt for all things African.

Read Ethang's disparaging comments about his country and people.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where the literacy rate is below 50%, And I see people do here, Exactly what this "test" is doing. Taking advantage of ignorance.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.

Ethang5 wrote: I think you're right. I live in Ghana, West Africa, And if you were to try the "God is evil" argument here people would simply think you were an obnoxious boob.

Ethang5 wrote: Long ago, I had a night job where I worked with this guy much like Im-Em here. He told me that reality was whatever he believed.

Ethang5 wrote: I currently live in a country with a society much closer to the 1st century than the society in which you live. I have seen people get burned alive in the street, And people a few blocks away never hear of it.

Ethang5 wrote: Having been kicked off more than a hundred forums, I understand your trepidation. But I don't think you have too much to worry about. The overwhelming majority of posters here would not want you banned or censured.

Ethang5 wrote:. I live among people like the Piraha. They have to work ALL DAY. Do you believe they are working only when hunting or gathering food? Do you think they have running water? Or electricity? They sleep often during the day because it is hot and they must work for everything. There are no stores, Only rudimentary tools. Please. Working only 15 hours a week would kill them, As evidenced by their dwindling tribe.

Ethang5 wrote: In Ghana where I live, The JW's are more aggressive. I always talk to them and let them know the many times when their organization made false prophesies about the end of the world.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, West Africa. If you think life is miserable, Come here and I will open your eyes. I will show you people who will infect you with their joy. Yet they aren't all Pollyannas. Some are cynics who have simply decided not to allow their environment to define them.

Ethang5 wrote: I have an electrified fence at my house. I had it put in. Is it wrong that I warn visitors to my home about it? If a visitor ignores my warning, Can he claim because I installed it, I'm responsible for his injury after having not believed my warning?

Ethang5 wrote: This is like when whites tell blacks, Why are you always on about racism? A black person's ethnicity is obvious.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.

The truth must hurt!
Try this.
Africans being treated for AIDS and extreme stupidity
https://youtu. Be/xk2v6WyoHUY
https://youtu. Be/ecATcD9ng3Y

Africans love to lick cows backsides.
https://youtu. Be/n8PYozPB-8I

Africans defecating outdoors.
https://youtu. Be/Lqg8I4w0ItM
--
Ethang has nothing nice to say about his country Ghana Africa. . . Or his African people and publicly declares he is not a proud African.

News flash!
But shortly after he confesses.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children.
----
Ethang is a loser. Case made by Harikrish
1. You admit you live in Africa a shithole country.
2. You admit you are African and
3. Now we know you are a delivery mule delivering free bibles to countries which outlaw possession of bibles.
4. You also admitted you lied about Trump calling Indians shitholes. But Trump did call African countries shitholes.
5. You also lied when you posted Indian PM called Indian shitholes.
Ethang said:Even the current Prime Minister of India, Says Indians are ashamed of being born. Do you know of any other country this is true of?

So you lied when you said Indian PM called Indians shitholes. All he said was they felt shame.

Ethang5: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang said: Ok shithole. Trump never insulted India. But your shithole country is sure mad about something.

Trump calls African countries shithole.
https://youtu. Be/HcMFmoTCdcU
https://youtu. Be/e-Odk4n_KeY
https://youtu. Be/X86DhwFXHUE

https://youtu. Be/FarNqgGCGDg

https://youtu. Be/2QBeq2VHD3o

Even UN finds Trump's African shithole comments racists.
https://youtu. Be/nT7PWcPPV-Q

African trade Union blasts Trump for racists comments.
https://youtu. Be/094VQ_vQmes

No White House denial of Trump's shithole comments.
https://youtu. Be/5eVLb4_JPRo
--
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
5/13/2019 10:25:41 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
The Moron Harikrish wrote:

And for as long as you subscribe to an extreme, Nonsense belief based on utter lies and deception, Not only will you never be smart but you will never be honest.

Hinduism in a nutshell, An extreme, Nonsense belief based on utter lies and deception. That is why you're so dishonest.

Oh, Here's a picture I found of a real spunky Indian woman.

Looks more like your Australian Aboriginal.

You told willows that Australian Aborigines were your ancestors. Do I need to cite it idiot? Or was it another typo?

By the way, Australia was also settled by migration out of Africa.

Oops!

Tripping on your own stupidity, Nigger.

Lol. You liked my telling you that you were trapped by your own stupidity and want to use my quip to save you from your own stupidity eh? Go ahead, See if it will.

Ancient Indians may have arrived on Australian shores about 4, 000 years ago and mixed with Aborigines before Europeans colonised the continent, According to scientists.

Where did the Aborigines come from?

A genetic study of more than 300 Aborigines, Indians and people from Papua New Guinea and south-east Asia found a "significant gene flow" from India to Australia about 4, 230 years ago. By Jonathan Pearlman in Sydney

What about earlier? People have been in Australia much longer than 4, 000 years moron.

The finding challenges the long-held assumption that humans arrived in Australia about 40, 000 years ago from Africa and remained isolated from other populations until British settlers appeared in the late eighteenth century.

It doesn't. A later migration 4, 000 years ago cannot "challenge" something that occurred 36, 000 years earlier. Stop being stupid.

A genetic study of more than 300 Aborigines, Indians and people from Papua New Guinea and south-east Asia found a "significant gene flow" from India to Australia about 4, 230 years ago.

Doesn't mean there could not have been earlier migrations. And there were.

"We also detect a signal indicative of substantial gene flow between the Indian populations and Australia well before European contact. We estimate this gene flow to have occurred during the Holocene, 4, 230 years ago. "

Which is why you told willows that Aborigines were your ancestors. Would you like me to cite the place?

Africans claimed they were in Australia 40, 000 years ago.

Not Africans idiot, Scientists claim.

So my ancestors were in Australia not 40, 000 but 4 000 years ago just before the Europeans arrived.

I said nothing about when. All I said was that you told willows that Australian Aborigines were your ancestors. You lied and said I was "tripping", But now we see I was right. You lied.

They owned some prime beach property which was stolen from them by the white European convicts.

So the Europeans who came later stole, But the Indians who came earlier didn't steal? Lol. OK stupid.

While you babble about dingos, I'll post this gem. You're uneducated and won't understand it, So I bolded the simple parts for you OK moron?

Trace human evolution in India, Find third gene trail

There was a third unknown hominid element " like the Neanderthals or Denisovans " who left some of their genes among ancestors of present day Indians, besides known contributions from the other two established ancestral hominid groups that lived in Europe and Central Asia, New research suggests.

A group of international geneticists suggests that this third hominid group most likely inhabited the Indian neighbourhood before going extinct around 50, 000 years ago.

This led the gene detectives to the third hominid group, Possibly inhabiting South-east Asia and Australia around 60, 000 years ago and later, and predicted to have emerged from the African hominid stock over 300, 000 years ago.

The scientists suggest the probability of this group mixing with human stocks around 50, 000 to 60, 000 years back and ultimately replacing it. In true sense those earlier hominid inhabitants were not separate species, But sub-species of the modern ancestral stock that came out of Africa around 80, 000 years ago to evolve as Homo sapiens sapiens of today.

The NIBMG scientists traced more or less similar amount of Neanderthal genes in Onges and Jarawas as in the mainlanders. This suggests that the admixture with Neanderthals occurred early in the primitive stock of migrating ancestral human populations.

Interestingly, The third gene trail also highlights the reason behind ethnic diversity in India. It urges a rethink on the route of dispersal of humans and the process of colonization in south-east Asian lands and Australia where India might have played an important transit point.

The study strengthens the "southern exit route" of the "Out of Africa" (OOA) theory which says that part of a hominid population from east Africa dispersed into different parts of Europe and Asia over 80, 000 years back. Many went north to northern Eurasia, Then migrated to central Asia (northern exit route) and may have gradually trickled back to southern Asia later.

They encountered Neanderthals and Denisovans on this path. Another group took a southward route to enter Asia through Asia Minor, Arabian deserts and Hindu Kush mountains to the plains of India. They started their journey to south-eastern oceanic islands including the Australian land mass (southern exit route). In this path, Andaman and Nicobar islands was a transit point.

The 2-3% mixing of unknown hominid genes in the Andaman islanders indicates the possibility of modern human invasion into an inhabited territory around 60, 000 years ago.

"There might have been waves of human invaders through the southern route and Onges or Jarawas are probably the remnants of the earliest wave who had to face the older hominid group, " Majumder says. For thousands of years they remained isolated in the remote islands thus preserving the genetic relics. Also they show around 2% drop of African alleles, but their apparent physical similarities with Africans could be due to local adaptation and act of natural selection.


I know your moron racism requires you to pretend to be obtuse to the science, I just post it to embarrass you in front of the Gentle Readers.

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.