Total Posts:153|Showing Posts:1-30|Last Page
Jump to topic:

The Curse Of Incest

ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2019 2:14:01 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The intent of this paper is to prove that,

1. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the sin of incest.
2. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the religion of Hinduism.
3. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the people of India.

Here is the curse. (Found in Genesis Chapter 9)

The Curse of Canaan.


25 - Cursed be Canaan, A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers.

26 - Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

27 - God shall enlarge Japheth, And he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.


Let's break the curse down. . .

Curses on Canaan:
1. A servant of servants shall Canaan be unto his brothers
2. Canaan shall be his [Shem's] servant.
3. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant

Blessings
1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem
2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

Three curses and three blessings.

I maintain that the curse of Canaan is fulfilled in the slavery of India.

- Indians are the descendants of Ham.
- Arabs are the descendants of Japheth.
- The British are the descendants of Shem.

So let's check the history of India and see if it better fits the curse of Canaan in Gen 9.

Curses

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.

Indians - Yes

Blessings

1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem

The descendants of Shem, The ancestor of the Roman empire, Saw their God, Jehovah, Exalted above all other gods.
The god of Japheth - Allah, The god of Ham - Krishna.

2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .

a. God shall enlarge Japheth. . .

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Madai is also the name of the deified ancestor of the Kachin people of Myanmar, According to the indigenous Kachin religion.

Also linked with Madai is the Iranian city of Hamadan.


https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.

The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.


For those who say Indians are white. . . .

http://www. Cogwriter. Com/india. Htm
Cush also had sons who went east into Asia rather than into Africa. Herodotus wrote:

The Ethiopians from the sun-rise. . . Were marshalled with the Indians, And did not at all differ from [them] in appearance but only in their language, And their hair. For the eastern Ethiopians are straight-haired; but those of (Africa) have hair more curly than that of any other people. These Ethiopians from Asia were accounted (almost the same as the Indians [of India]).

The brown people of southern India and Ceylon are also descendants of Cush. Historians call them Dravidians; the ancients called them Sibae (Smith's Classical Dictionary). Their Bible name was Seba (Gen. 10:7). Josephus recognized an eastern and a western Cush--one in Asia, The other in Africa (Antiquities, Book 1, VI, 2). Herodotus calls them "Asiatic Ethiopians" (Thalia, Section 94). "Ethiopia" in Ezekiel 38:5 should be translated "Cush. " It refers primarily to the Asiatic Cush, Which is India today.

In India the highest castes were not only called Brahmins, But also Rajputs. "Rajput" means "king or chief of Put" (Raja, " Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. ). "Phut" or "Put" means a "warrior" in Hebrew. The Rajputs are the most noted warriors in India. . . Of the four sons of Ham, Only Cush bears a name that means "black. " Just as some of the sons of Cush are brown, So some of the children of Phut are black. The Indians of central and northern India vary from light to dark brown.


So let us summerize. . .

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.

Indians - Yes

D. Japth shall dwell in the tents of Shem. . . Who dwelled in the tents of Shem?
Indians - No

E. Cursed be Canaan. . .
For 17 centuries, ALL Indians were slaves. The curse better fits the group that suffered complete slavery.
Indians - Yes

The curse was not to all of Ham's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But because of Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery, But for 17 centuries, All Indians, Every one of them, Were slaves or the slaves of slaves. Just as the bible prophesies.

Note also that as all Hindus were Indian, Hinduism is the only one of the major religions where every believer in the religion was a slave.

The only people 100% covered by the curse are Indians
The only religion 100% covered by the curse is Hinduism.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2019 2:15:50 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
People today think it's no big deal that the bible pointed to Africa as the source of all humans on earth, But that is because they grew up with the out of Africa idea. But before science confirmed it, The out of Africa theory was novel and scary. And the racists fought against it mightily.

But as always, Each new discovery of science only makes the bible more plausible. As the science of biogenetics matured, It became clearer and clearer that the bible could not be this correct just by coincidence.

It has become clear though that Indian slavery did precisely match the curse.

First, The only descendants of Canaan who match the "servants of servants" are the branch of Seba. There are other descendants of Canaan who were enslaved from time to time in different places, But none were completely enslaved as the branch of Seba was.

For example, When God told Israel they would be enslaved by Egypt, The entire country of Israel was taken into Egypt. All of them were enslaved in Egypt.

So the only descendants that match the "servant of servants" part of the curse is the Seba branch of the Canaan line. The caste system in India made slaves within the slave system, Possible. An Indian enslaved by the Arabs, Could himself have a dalit slave.

In one of the testimonials in "Indians Speak On India", The speaker tells us that even today in India, Any higher caste person can order a dalit to remove the corpse of say, A dead animal from the road, And the dalit would be forced under threat of bodily harm, To obey.

The second part of the curse is, That the cursed line would be slaves of both the descendants of Shem and Japheth. Again, The only descendants of Ham who qualify are the Seba line. No other line out of Canaan fits this condition.

So then the only question is, Who are today's descendants of Seba?

The answer is in ancient history. Ancient writings mention Sabeans (Sabae) as the people who settled India. Some of the ancient accounts of India also mention names associated with the Cush line, Like rajputs being a combination word of raj, Which is Indian, And phut, Which is African.

As anthropologists tracked the movements of ancient peoples, It became clear that the Sabaens were ancestors of the first people to inhabit India.

And the correctness of the bible becomes plain. The curse of Canaan could only be. . . . .

1. On the actual descendants of Canaan
2. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants
3. On the descendants of Canaan who became servants of servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.
4. On the descendants of Canaan whose entire line became servants to both the descendants of Shem and Japheth.

The only population fitting all 4 requirements of the curse is the Seba line that became India. And history shows India was totally enslaved for 17 centuries. The entire country.

Then after science confirmed that Indians are descendants of Africans, The case became airtight.

The curse was on Indians.

In my next post, I address the question that occurs to anyone reading the account of the curse, Why were the descendants of Canaan cursed and not Ham himself?
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2019 2:21:24 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Earlier I said,

In my next post, I address the question that occurs to anyone reading the account of the curse, Why were the descendants of Canaan cursed and not Ham himself?

Now remember the story of Lot? Lot's two daughters, After Sodom was destroyed, Thought the world had been destroyed, And that there were no more men left in the world. They knew of Noah's flood and why God had pruned the world.

So in order for human kind not to die out, They got their father Lot drunk and had sex with him while he was in a drunken stupor to have children who would populate the Earth again, Ala, Noah's sons and their wives.

Pay attention to this verse in Gen 19. 24, "And Noah awoke from his wine, And knew what his younger son had done to him. "

How did Noah know what Ham had done? At the time, Noah was drunk and unconscious. How did Noah know right away upon wakening what Ham had done to him? And how did Noah know right away it was Ham? It seems like Ham already had a reputation.

Ham's offspring was cursed because Ham had done the same thing the daughters of Lot had done. Thus Noah cursed the same tool Ham had used to abuse, The tool that would bring about his own sons.

Now note the specificity of the curse. Three distinct curses, And three blessings. First the blessings.

Noah did not bless Shem or Japheth. He blessed the God of Shem and Japheth. Why?

In the case of Lot, The daughters meant to derail what they saw as God's will. Even breaking God's specific commandment. "Do not lie with your father or mother. " Ham spilled his seed on his father in homosexual lust instead of following God's will, That they replenish the world with their wives.

It is the same sin in Noah's case as in Lot's case. And we know what happened to the ammonites and moabites, The offspring of Lot's sinful daughters. In fact, The first time Sodom is mentioned is in Gen 13. 13 saying that the men of Sodom were exceedingly wicked sinners.

In Deu. 7, God tells Moses not to have any associations with the Canaanites, Because they would "turn away the children from following Jehovah", And make them serve other Gods. This other god was Krishna, The incest god of their ancestor, Ham.

This is why Noah blesses Jehovah in his curse of Canaan's descendants. They had turned away from the one true God to worship the demon Krishna.

The curse was on any descendant of Ham who turned away from God, To worship demons. So God kicked them out of the land of Canaan. And we now know where they went. Correct, To India.

Noah's curse was on any of Canaan's sons who followed in the filth of their grandfather"s sin. It is obviously not on all Canaan's offspring. Canaan is recorded as having many sons, Sidon, Heth, The Jebusites, Amorites, Girgasites, Hivites, Arkites, And so on.

Verse 9. 18 ends by saying, ". . . Afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad. "

The Canaanites were the ones who settled Sodom and Gomorrah. Precisely in the homosexual footsteps of their filthy ancestor Ham. And when God kicked them, With fire and brimstone, Out of the land they should have inherited, They ran, Terrified, All the way to the Indian valley, And set up Hinduism there, With its vile caste system and sick karma doctrine.

And the curse of Noah then came into effect, They were enslaved, First by the descendants of Japheth, And then by the descendants of Shem, For one thousand and seven hundred years, Just as the curse stipulates.

So was all the Earth populated by the sons of Noah. 3 men and 3 women, All one race.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2019 2:26:42 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
This will take several posts, But the result will open your eyes. Remember now,

1. We showed by science that it was blacks from Africa who settled and populated India originally.
2. We showed that the Bible agrees that it was blacks who are the ancestors of Indians.
3. We showed that only Indian slavery fulfills all the details of the curse of Ham.

Now we're on to the question, "why were the descendants of Canaan cursed instead of Ham? " As the bible indicates, It has to do with idolatry and incest. But I have to give you the background for you to get the complete picture.

https://www. Google. Com/amp/s/blog. Ipleaders. In/incest-legality/amp/

Is incest a crime in India?

No. Incest is nowhere defined in the penal provisions of India. Therefore, If individuals are involved in incest, They cannot be punished for a crime of incest, Although, The may be punished for any other legal ground such as adultery or sodomy or rape. Incest is, The crime of sexual relations or marriage taking place between a male and female who are so closely linked by blood or affinity that law prohibits such activity. When anyone enters into an incestuous relationship willingly, It is not an offence, Per se the penal provision of India. Thus, There is no offence called incest as per the Indian Penal Code.

Imagine a society with no law prohibiting incest! India is such a country.

Now imagine a country whose religion worships "gods" who perform incest. Hinduism is such a religion.

It is Hindus themselves who brag about their "gods" high libido. And accounts of incest can be found in their "holy book" where their "gods" had incestuous relations with their own sisters, And raped wives of other men.

The story in Noah mirrors the story about Lot. Next we will read the story of Lot and see how it ties in with the story of Noah, And why the curse that condemned all Indians to slavery was due to two nasty behavior of Indians themselved, Idolatry and incest.

Incest is a kind of idolatry. Worshipping a created creature inside your family, With a spirit just like yours, Instead of worshipping the Creator. It is an illicit relationship. Incest is an illicit relationship. Loving a person inside your family, With flesh just like yours, Instead of loving the creator.

WARNING: This is Hinduism we're talking about, So filthy depictions of sex, Rape, And incest will sadly be necessary.

On to Lot next, But keep the 3 points listed above in memory.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2019 2:42:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Unlike as in the Lot story, The Noah story does not specifically mention the sex between Noah and Ham. That is normal, As the bible never specifically mentions homosexual sex. It was far too disgusting to the people being addressed at the time to be mentioned in any detail.

But the parallels in the story of Lot gives us clues.

In Noah's case, It was right after water raining down from the sky.

In Lot's case, It was right after fire raining down from the sky.

In both cases, They believed everyone else in the world had been killed.

They both used alcohol to force their will upon Noah and Lot.

In Noah's case, It was Ham and his son Canaan, In Lot's case, It was the elder daughter and her younger sister.

And in each case, The descendants of these wicked people caused much trouble and heartache. The sin was the same. Incest.

This is where Hindus get the idea that they have the world's oldest religion. After fleeing to the Indian valley, Far away from Noah and Africa, Over the years the elders lost the memory of Noah, Lot, And Jehovah. They began to believe the religion their ancestors brought from Africa was the first. After all, The world was empty of people, What other religion could have been earlier?

So they set up their religion and their country, Krishna making sure that idolatry and incest were built into their culture. But God's curse rested on them. The curse was on idolatry and incest. And as one, Through their religion, Worshipping "gods" that championed incest, They brought the curse down on themselves.

The curse brought first the descendants of Japheth, The Persians, To enslave them, And then later, The descendants of Shem, The British, To keep them enslaved.

Today, Indians have learned that Hinduism is their problem, And have started outlawing parts of that vile religion.

They started with widow burning and moved to outlaw the practice of prostituting little girls in their temples, And now are fighting to outlaw the slave making caste system.

Soon, They will try to tackle incest, The very core of Krishna's rebellion against Jehovah, And the true fight for the soul of India will commence.

Because of western racists hoping to justify the slavery of Africans, The fake story of Africans being the ones under the curse of Ham was published to the world.

But a close look at the curse and history shows us that the curse rested only on those Africans who left Africa and settled in the Indian valley, Taking their incest idol with them.

Today, India still has the most modern day slaves than any country on earth, But as they increasingly reject the evil of Hinduism, The old curse will fall away, And India might be able to reach it's full potential.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2019 3:40:07 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
The intent of this paper is to prove that,

1. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the sin of incest.
2. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the religion of Hinduism.
3. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the people of India.

Here is the curse. (Found in Genesis Chapter 9)

The Curse of Canaan.


25 - Cursed be Canaan, A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers.

26 - Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.

27 - God shall enlarge Japheth, And he shall dwell in the tents of Shem, And Canaan shall be his servant.


Let's break the curse down. . .

Curses on Canaan:
1. A servant of servants shall Canaan be unto his brothers
2. Canaan shall be his [Shem's] servant.
3. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant

Blessings
1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem
2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem

Three curses and three blessings.

I maintain that the curse of Canaan is fulfilled in the slavery of India.

- Indians are the descendants of Ham.
- Arabs are the descendants of Japheth.
- The British are the descendants of Shem.

Indians are descendants of Japheth. Read your bible nigger.
Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

So let's check the history of India and see if it better fits the curse of Canaan in Gen 9.

Curses

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers
The Canaanites moved out of Africa to the land of Canaan where they were punished and turned to slaves by the Israelites. The Canaanites were never in India.

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Indians - Yes
The Indian drove out the Arabs. Indians are now masters of their own country. Africans are still black skinned negroids discriminated throughout the world struggling to make Black Lives Matter.

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Indians - Yes
That applies to Canaanites who were Africans. Read your bible, Nigger.
Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations.
Only Ham's children were the first Africans.
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

As you can see those are African countries. Both the curse and hot sun changed the genetics of Hams descendant. This gave rise to the African race and phenotypes.

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.

African slaves were owned and traded by Arabs for over 1300 years. African slaves were own and traded by Arabs, Romans, Portuguese and Christians fir centuries.
Indians - Yes

Blessings

1. Blessed be the the Lord God of Shem

The descendants of Shem, The ancestor of the Roman empire, Saw their God, Jehovah, Exalted above all other gods.
The god of Japheth - Allah, The god of Ham - Krishna.
Krishna is not mentioned in the bible, Ignorant low IQ nigger Ethang.

2. God shall enlarge Japheth
3. He [Japheth] shall dwell in the tents of Shem
India is a nuclear power, Economic power with over a billion Hindus. Christianity was never a consideration to Hindus. Not after seeing what Christianity did to Africans, Condemning Africans to slavery. Nigger you are following a slave religion.

According to the Book of Jubilees (10:50-51), Madai (descendant of Japheth) had married a daughter of Shem, And preferred to live among Shem's descendants, Rather than dwell in Japheth's allotted inheritance beyond the Black Sea; so he begged his brothers-in-law, Elam, Asshur and Arphaxad, Until he finally received from them the land that was named after him, Media. .

Why did Ham's son Canaan leave Africa when Ham and his other sons settled in African countries?
4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)

And Ham divided amongst his sons, And the first portion came forth for Cush towards the east(Sudan, Ethiopia), And to the west of him for Mizraim(Egypt), And to the west of him for Put(Lybia), And to the west of him [and to the west thereof] on the sea for Canaan.
Jubilees 9:1
And Canaan saw the land of Lebanon to the river of Egypt, That it was very good, And he went not into the land of his inheritance to the west (that is to) the sea, And he dwelt in the land of Lebanon, Eastward and westward from the border of Jordan and from the border of the sea. And Ham, His father, And Cush and Mizraim his brothers said unto him: 'Thou hast settled in a land which is not thine, And which did not fall to us by lot: do not do so; for if thou dost do so, Thou and thy sons will fall in the land and (be) accursed through sedition; for by sedition ye have settled, And by sedition will thy children fall, And thou shalt be rooted out for ever. Dwell not in the dwelling of Shem; for to Shem and to his sons did it come by their lot. Cursed art thou, And cursed shalt thou be beyond all the sons of Noah, By the curse by which we bound ourselves by an oath in the presence of the holy judge, And in the presence of Noah our father. ' But he did not hearken unto them, And dwelt in the land of Lebanon from Hamath to the entering of Egypt, He and his sons until this day. And for this reason that land is named Canaan. R32;"Jubilees 10:29-34.

a. God shall enlarge Japheth. . .

Some want to say Madai represents Indians. That Indians were descendants of Japheth and therefore white. But. . .

https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Madai
Madai (Hebrew) is a son of Japheth and one of the 16 grandsons of Noah in the Book of Genesis of the Hebrew Bible.

Biblical scholars have generally identified Madai with the Iranian Medes of much later records. The Medes, Reckoned to be his offspring by Josephus and most subsequent writers, Were also known as Madai, Including in both Assyrian and Hebrew sources. Some scholars in more modern times have also proposed connections with various earlier nations, Such as Mitanni, [1] Matiene, And Mannai. In addition, The Kurds still maintain traditions of descent from Madai.

Madai is also the name of the deified ancestor of the Kachin people of Myanmar, According to the indigenous Kachin religion.

Also linked with Madai is the Iranian city of Hamadan.


https://en. M. Wikipedia. Org/wiki/Japheth
In identifying Japheth's descendants, Muslim exegesis more-or-less agrees with the Biblical traditions. He is usually regarded as the ancestor of the Gog and Magog tribes, And, At times, Of the Turks, Khazars, And Slavs.

The Madai mentioned in the bible is not Indians, They are Persians, Today's Iranians.

The Persians were driven out of their homeland by the Arabs. They settled in India to become Indo Persians. So did the Indo Europeans settle in India to become Indo Aryans. Together they make up over 1 billion Indians.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/27/2019 3:47:00 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
The curse of incest is very African. You can see how Africans like Ethang justify incest and slavery. 80% of Africans are Christians who follow a slave religion.

Ethsng's confessions prove he is just a poor negroid slave, A pervert and he has 3 illegitimate bastard daughters. Wow! Ethang is one sick nigger!


Ethang5 wrote: So it causes me no consternation. As long as Jesus remains on His throne, And I remain His personal property, There is no problem I cannot face.
Ethang confesses he is a chattel slave in Africa and his children are illegitimate bastards.
#29, #38 Harikrish is soundly beaten:
https://www. Debate. Org/forums/religion/topic/4341719/
That would make Ethang a chattel slave.
Now for Ethang's 3 illegitimate children that he kept a secret which Harikrish also exposes along with Ethang's other confessions.

Ethang5 wrote: Jesus does not sell His slaves, We are His forever. My kids are owned by Jesus also. After all, He created them.

So you had nothing to do with your childrens birth. Wow! Another case of virgin birth.
See how the nigger lies. Busted again nigger.

Nigger you are a liar and a lunatic to claim Jesus created your children. Now Christians like you are claiming Jesus is into creating babies. Just like God created Jesus by gang raping Virgin Mary to conceive Jesus an illegitimate Jewish bastard. You are claiming your 3 children are illegitimate bastards because Jesus had a hand in creating them while you like Joseph stood idly by.
Ethang wrote: I have 3 daughters. When I tell them to listen to me, It isn't ego. I require them to obey me, It isn't ego. (It's incest, Nigger).

Now we have the connection between Ethang's confession and slavery and his 3 illegitimate bastard children.

Ethang said:
How could I modify links in YOUR posts? I'm just a poor African slave remember?
Post #186 Harikrish for Christian champion:
https://www. Debate. Org/forums/religion/topic/78923p/7/

Ethang5 wrote: We agree here, But for some reason, You keep repeating on what we agree. Yes, I am not proud to be African. I cannot be proud to be African.

The connection: Ethang is not proud to be African because he is just a poor African slave. OK we get it! Now we get why Ethang is obsessed with incest. He confessed he has 3 illegitimate bastard children his daughters. Yikes!

Then there is the animals you tried to breed with.

Read nigger Ethang's confessions.
Ethang5 wrote: I have raised many generations of dogs, Cows, Horses, And pigs. They generally are not incestous in non-restrictive environments. Human even more so. Do animals also consider offspring?
Ethang5 wrote: Lol. Of course I am African, Why do you keep talking about America?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children. (Pimping children are also illegal, Nigger)
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.
Ethang5 wrote: "I'm not a proud African. And if I were, I would not lie about Africa's achievements. "
Ethang5 wrote: I am just a poor Afrcan slave, Remember?
Ethang5 wrote: I never said I was smart.
Ethang5 wrote: Yes, I am not proud to be African. I cannot be proud to be African.
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where the literacy rate is below 50%, And I see people do here, Exactly what this "test" is doing. Taking advantage of ignorance.
Ethang5 said: I live close to where Boko Haram operates. There are no Boko Harams in America.

Ethang5 wrote: I think you're right. I live in Ghana, West Africa, And if you were to try the "God is evil" argument here people would simply think you were an obnoxious boob.

Ethang5 wrote: I currently live in a country with a society much closer to the 1st century than the society in which you live. I have seen people get burned alive in the street, And people a few blocks away never hear of it.

Ethang5 wrote:. I live among people like the Piraha.
Ethang5 wrote: In Ghana where I live, The JW's are more aggressive. I always talk to them and let them know the many times when their organization made false prophesies about the end of the world.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, West Africa. If you think life is miserable, Come here and I will open your eyes.
Ethang5 wrote: I have an electrified fence at my house. I had it put in.
I work with prisoners. Many say they are Christian because the think it will facilitate their case with the parole board.

Your said your father was a black negroid atheist. But you turned out to be a black negroid slave delivering bibles for free whereas your position as an atheist was that religion was a crutch for the mentally weak. "

Karmic Justice combined with the curse of Ham and Slavery by Arabs produced Black shitholes.
Wow! Africans are cursed in 4 religions. Judaism, Islam, Christianity and Hinduism.

Read the link list #186 Harikrish for Christian champion.
https://www. Debate. Org/forums/religion/topic/78923p/7/
You said: How could I modify links in YOUR posts? I'm just a poor African slave, Remember?
You are both a poor African and a slave.

Look at all the variations in your confessions over time.
1. He is not a proud African.
2. He is a lol Of Course I am African
3. He is not proud to be African.
4. He cannot be proud to be African.
5. He is African American.
6. He is just a poor African. Slave
7. He wants to be called nigger. I called him niggar to be polite. He insisted it was nigger.
So you can see because of the many exchanges we had his memory was not always sharp.

Ethang5 wrote: I have 3 daughters. When I tell them to listen to me, It isn't ego. I require them to obey me, It isn't ego.
It is incest!

That suggests your total control over your daughters. Control and an obsession with incest is a dangerous combination. To go as far as Hindu incest mythologies to justify his indulgence suggests the nigger Ethang suffers from guilt.

How would you translate these contradictory Christian behaviour, Nigger?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Are you saying incest is not only biblical, It is also customary in Ghana where you live?
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 10:18:25 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
So I'm thinking, If Krishna was behind the sin of Ham, And the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, And the curse on India, His work is probably in the bible too.

Krishna is the demon of Incest, Rape, And homosexuality. So I decided to look for cases of incest in the gospels and I soon found Mark 6, The death of John the Baptist.

Mar 6:17 - For Herod himself had sent forth and laid hold upon John, And bound him in prison for Herodias' sake, His brother Philip's wife: for he had married her.

Mar 6:18 - For John had said unto Herod, It is not lawful for thee to have thy brother's wife.

Mar 6:19 - Therefore Herodias had a quarrel against him, And would have killed him; but she could not:

Mar 6:20 - For Herod feared John, Knowing that he was a just man and an holy, And observed him; and when he heard him, He did many things, And heard him gladly.

Mar 6:21 - And when a convenient day was come, That Herod on his birthday made a supper to his lords, High captains, And chief estates of Galilee;

Mar 6:22 - And when the daughter of the said Herodias came in, And danced, And pleased Herod and them that sat with him, The king said unto the damsel, Ask of me whatsoever thou wilt, And I will give it thee.

Mar 6:23 - And he sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, I will give it thee, Unto the half of my kingdom.

Mar 6:24 - And she went forth, And said unto her mother, What shall I ask? And she said, The head of John the Baptist.

Mar 6:25 - And she came in straightway with haste unto the king, And asked, Saying, I will that thou give me by and by in a charger the head of John the Baptist.

Mar 6:26 - And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath's sake, And for their sakes which sat with him, He would not reject her.

Mar 6:27 - And immediately the king sent an executioner, And commanded his head to be brought: and he went and beheaded him in the prison,

Mar 6:28 - And brought his head in a charger, And gave it to the damsel: and the damsel gave it to her mother.


Again, The problem was incest. Herod had married his brothers divorced wife. But I think there is more to this story.

Notice that Herodias, Herod's wife, Was not at his birthday bash. But her daughter was. She was dancing for Herod, And her dancing so pleased Herod that he rashly promised the girl anything, Even up to half of his kingdom!

I think it was this teenaged daughter of his brother that Herod wanted. His niece. That is what John the baptist really objected to. Herod was engaging in incest with his niece!

Again note the similarity in the work of Krishna. . .

Noah - Ham goaded by his son Canaan
Lot - Younger daughter goaded by elder daughter.
Herod - Salome goaded by her mother Herodias

In Noah's case, Krishna took away the promise land from whom it had been promised. He sought to destroy Israel, The country from which Jesus was supposed to come.

In Lots case, Krishna sought to destroy Abraham, From whom descendants was to come Jesus.

In Herod's case, Krishna was taking a shot at Jesus Himself. Remember that Herod was the one who would judge Jesus.

Luke 23 says,

Luk 23:6 - When Pilate heard of Galilee, He asked if the Man were a Galilean.

Luk 23:7 - And as soon as he knew that He belonged to Herod"s jurisdiction, He sent Him to Herod, Who was also in Jerusalem at that time.

Luk 23:8 - Now when Herod saw Jesus, He was exceedingly glad; for he had desired for a long time to see Him, Because he had heard many things about Him, And he hoped to see some miracle done by Him.


Why did Herod send Jesus back to Pilate? Jesus was under his jurisdiction, As even Pilate knew.

I think Krishna knew, That because Herod liked John the Baptist, (Mar 6:20 - For Herod feared John, Knowing that he was a just man and an holy, ) had John lived, He would have converted Herod, And if he could get Herod to kill John, His guilt and shame would make it impossible for him later to kill Jesus too, Stopping the plan of God to have Jesus sacrificed for the sins of the world.

This why Herod sent Jesus back. He was still regretful about having killed John. And he knew that Pilate had found no fault in Jesus. Herod hoped, And expected Pilate to find Jesus innocent.

Luk 23:12 - That very day Pilate and Herod became friends with each other, For previously they had been at enmity with each other.

So Herod's incest allowed Krishna to both silence the influence of John, And hamper the plan of Jesus to be sacrificed. But again, Krishna failed.

But it was a close thing, As both Herod and Pilate saw no sin in Jesus. Pilate tried hard to get Jesus released.

Throughout history, The "god" of incest has repeatedly used incest to oppose the plan of God. But when Jesus said on the cross, "It is finished". Krishna and his demons had finally lost. The plan was accomplished.

Today, Krishna is. . .

". . . having great anger, Because he knows that he has a short time. " Revelation 12. 12

So though he can no longer stop the plan of salvation, He can, Out of spite, Hamper the children of God.

But, King Jesus having. . .

. . . . Spoiled principalities and powers, He made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it. - Col 2:15

Demon Krishna - 0
King Jesus - 100
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 1:21:22 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
So I'm thinking, If Krishna was behind the sin of Ham, And the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, And the curse on India, His work is probably in the bible too.

Krishna is the demon of Incest, Rape, And homosexuality. So I decided to look for cases of incest in the gospels and I soon found Mark 6, The death of John the Baptist.

Mar 6:17 - For Herod himself had sent forth and laid hold upon John, And bound him in prison for Herodias' sake, His brother Philip's wife: for he had married her.

Mar 6:18 - For John had said unto Herod, It is not lawful for thee to have thy brother's wife.

Mar 6:19 - Therefore Herodias had a quarrel against him, And would have killed him; but she could not:

Mar 6:20 - For Herod feared John, Knowing that he was a just man and an holy, And observed him; and when he heard him, He did many things, And heard him gladly.

Mar 6:21 - And when a convenient day was come, That Herod on his birthday made a supper to his lords, High captains, And chief estates of Galilee;

Mar 6:22 - And when the daughter of the said Herodias came in, And danced, And pleased Herod and them that sat with him, The king said unto the damsel, Ask of me whatsoever thou wilt, And I will give it thee.

Mar 6:23 - And he sware unto her, Whatsoever thou shalt ask of me, I will give it thee, Unto the half of my kingdom.

Mar 6:24 - And she went forth, And said unto her mother, What shall I ask? And she said, The head of John the Baptist.

Mar 6:25 - And she came in straightway with haste unto the king, And asked, Saying, I will that thou give me by and by in a charger the head of John the Baptist.

Mar 6:26 - And the king was exceeding sorry; yet for his oath's sake, And for their sakes which sat with him, He would not reject her.

Mar 6:27 - And immediately the king sent an executioner, And commanded his head to be brought: and he went and beheaded him in the prison,

Mar 6:28 - And brought his head in a charger, And gave it to the damsel: and the damsel gave it to her mother.


Again, The problem was incest. Herod had married his brothers divorced wife. But I think there is more to this story.

Notice that Herodias, Herod's wife, Was not at his birthday bash. But her daughter was. She was dancing for Herod, And her dancing so pleased Herod that he rashly promised the girl anything, Even up to half of his kingdom!

I think it was this teenaged daughter of his brother that Herod wanted. His niece. That is what John the baptist really objected to. Herod was engaging in incest with his niece!

Again note the similarity in the work of Krishna. . .

Noah - Ham goaded by his son Canaan
Lot - Younger daughter goaded by elder daughter.
Herod - Salome goaded by her mother Herodias

In Noah's case, Krishna took away the promise land from whom it had been promised. He sought to destroy Israel, The country from which Jesus was supposed to come.

In Lots case, Krishna sought to destroy Abraham, From whom descendants was to come Jesus.

In Herod's case, Krishna was taking a shot at Jesus Himself. Remember that Herod was the one who would judge Jesus.

Luke 23 says,

Luk 23:6 - When Pilate heard of Galilee, He asked if the Man were a Galilean.

Luk 23:7 - And as soon as he knew that He belonged to Herod"s jurisdiction, He sent Him to Herod, Who was also in Jerusalem at that time.

Luk 23:8 - Now when Herod saw Jesus, He was exceedingly glad; for he had desired for a long time to see Him, Because he had heard many things about Him, And he hoped to see some miracle done by Him.


Why did Herod send Jesus back to Pilate? Jesus was under his jurisdiction, As even Pilate knew.

I think Krishna knew, That because Herod liked John the Baptist, (Mar 6:20 - For Herod feared John, Knowing that he was a just man and an holy, ) had John lived, He would have converted Herod, And if he could get Herod to kill John, His guilt and shame would make it impossible for him later to kill Jesus too, Stopping the plan of God to have Jesus sacrificed for the sins of the world.

This why Herod sent Jesus back. He was still regretful about having killed John. And he knew that Pilate had found no fault in Jesus. Herod hoped, And expected Pilate to find Jesus innocent.

Luk 23:12 - That very day Pilate and Herod became friends with each other, For previously they had been at enmity with each other.

So Herod's incest allowed Krishna to both silence the influence of John, And hamper the plan of Jesus to be sacrificed. But again, Krishna failed.

But it was a close thing, As both Herod and Pilate saw no sin in Jesus. Pilate tried hard to get Jesus released.

Throughout history, The "god" of incest has repeatedly used incest to oppose the plan of God. But when Jesus said on the cross, "It is finished". Krishna and his demons had finally lost. The plan was accomplished.

Today, Krishna is. . .

". . . having great anger, Because he knows that he has a short time. " Revelation 12. 12

So though he can no longer stop the plan of salvation, He can, Out of spite, Hamper the children of God.

But, King Jesus having. . .

. . . . Spoiled principalities and powers, He made a shew of them openly, triumphing over them in it. - Col 2:15

Demon Krishna - 0
King Jesus - 100

So incest is in the bible just like the biblical curse that condemned Africans to slavery. But Krishna is not in the bible. That is why the religion you follow is a slave religion and christians justified slavery as biblical because they found verses that support slavery.
You even found verses that justify incest. Now show us how God gang raped Mary in Luke 1 to produce the illegitimate Jewish bastard Jesus.
We have your confession your 3 daughters are illegitimate bastards too. That combined with your obsession with the biblical incest makes you one very sick poor nigger slave.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 3:31:21 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Dr. Franklin wrote:
Kyke redskin. Shut up

You must be speaking to Jesus. You called Jesus a redskin and we know Jesus was a kyke. Franklin is a Jewish name which makes you a self loathing Jew and a Christ killer. Wow another circumcised dick has been busted!

Franklin said: Wrong again, Jesus the redskin doesn't know anything. TYPICAL. Now get off your computer and worships the tress and go WOO WOO WOO WOO with your dirty @ss mouth
Dr.Franklin
Posts: 1,113
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 3:33:30 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH LOSERINO, Jesus was not a kyke but a great CHRISTIAN LOSERINO GET REKTED.

WOOWOWOWOWOWOOWOWOWOWOWO worship the trees
Dead website
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 3:35:06 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
Dr. Franklin wrote:

Kyke redskin. Shut up

Thank you Doctor.

Dr. Franklin wrote:
Kyke redskin. Shut up

Franklin, You must be speaking to Jesus. You called Jesus a redskin and we know Jesus was a kyke. Franklin is a Jewish name which makes you a self loathing Jew and a Christ killer. Wow another circumcised dick has been busted!

Franklin said: Wrong again, Jesus the redskin doesn't know anything. TYPICAL. Now get off your computer and worships the tress and go WOO WOO WOO WOO with your dirty @ss mouth.

You are thanking Franklin who called Jesus a redskin kyke and told Jesus to shut up. You are one very sick nigger.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 6:03:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Here is another case, More subtle but there all the same. I will pull the story from both Mark 5 and Luke 8 because each of them includes detail not in the other.

Luk 8:27 - And when he went forth to land, There met him out of the city a certain man, Which had devils long time, And ware no clothes, neither abode in any house, But in the tombs.

Mar 5:3 - Who had his dwelling among the tombs; and no man could bind him, no, Not with chains:

Mar 5:4 - Because that he had been often bound with fetters and chains, and the chains had been plucked asunder by him, And the fetters broken in pieces: neither could any man tame him.

Luk 8:29 - ( For oftentimes it had caught him: and he was kept bound with chains and in fetters; and he brake the bands, And was driven of the devil into the wilderness. )


Now, Ask yourself. Why would they chain up a crazy guy who only roamed the mountains and tombs?

Mar 5:5 - And always, Night and day, He was in the mountains, And in the tombs, Crying, And cutting himself with stones.

Mar 5:6 - But when he saw Jesus afar off, He ran and worshipped him,

Luk 8:28 -. . . . And with a loud voice said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, Thou Son of God most high? I beseech thee, Torment me not.


Notice that the demon recognizes Jesus straight away.

Mar 5:8 - For he said unto him, Come out of the man, Thou unclean spirit.

Mar 5:9 - And he asked him, What is thy name? And he answered, Saying, My name is Legion: for we are many.


Consider Lot, When the evil men surrounded his house. They were many.

Consider Herod, When the crowd surrounded his house shouting for the death of Jesus, They were many.

It is the same demon at work here. The fingerprints of Krishna are all over the crime scene.

Mar 5:10 - And he besought him much that he would not send them away out of the country.

Luk 8:32 - And there was there an herd of many swine feeding on the mountain: and they besought him that he would suffer them to enter into them. And he suffered them.

Mar 5:13 - And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, And entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the sea, (they were about two thousand;) and were choked in the sea.


As these were Jews, It was unusual that these were pigs. Who does not eat cows? Correct. Krishna followers.

Mar 5:14 - And they that fed the swine fled, And told it in the city, And in the country. And they went out to see what it was that was done.

Luk 8:35 -. . . . And came to Jesus, And found the man, Out of whom the devils were departed, Sitting at the feet of Jesus, Clothed, And in his right mind: and they were afraid.

Mar 5:16 - And they that saw it told them how it befell to him that was possessed with the devil, And also concerning the swine.

Luk 8:36 - They also which saw it told them by what means he that was possessed of the devils was healed.

Luk 8:37 - Then the whole multitude of the country of the Gadarenes round about besought him to depart from them; for they were taken with great fear: and he went up into the ship, And returned back again.


Of course, Followers of Krishna do not recognize Jesus, And want no part of Him.

Luk 8:38 - Now the man out of whom the devils were departed besought him that he might be with him: but Jesus sent him away, Saying,

Mar 5:19 -. . . . Go home to thy friends, And tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, And hath had compassion on thee.

Luk 8:39 - Return to thine own house, And shew how great things God hath done unto thee. And he went his way, And published throughout the whole city how great things Jesus had done unto him.


But the healed man, Now in his right mind, Recognizes Jesus and wants to stay with Him.

Luk 8:40 - And it came to pass, That, When Jesus was returned, the people gladly received him: for they were all waiting for him.

One group welcomed Jesus, And were waiting for Him, The other group, Rejected Jesus, And did not want Him around.

There is two things I want to point out.

The passage says the madman went around naked, And other men were afraid to pass near where he roamed. They chained him because he sexually assaulted passersby. Even men.

Notice it says he lived in no house, And after being healed, Even Jesus did not send him back to his family, But said go to your house, To your friends. Jesus mentions no family.

This man had already assaulted and alienated his family. He probably had a history if incest with them.

And finally, The demon said it's name was legion, Because they were many. Why was this demon here? Among Krishna worshippers? Why did he implore Jesus to let him stay.

The patron demon of India would be legion, For Indians are themselves many. Notice at Lots house the evil men were struck blind, And it seems so were the pigs in this story.

These many demons are the same ones animating the evil men trying to break into Lots house, And the same ones gassing up the crowds screaming for the death of Jesus.

Legion. The many. The demon Krishna. The demon worshipped by the many. Indians.

The curse of Ham had come full circle.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 8:10:08 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
Dr. Franklin wrote:
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH LOSERINO, Jesus was not a kyke but a great CHRISTIAN LOSERINO GET REKTED.

WOOWOWOWOWOWOOWOWOWOWOWO worship the trees
That's not what you said about Jeaus.

Franklin said: Wrong again, Jesus the redskin doesn't know anything. TYPICAL. Now get off your computer and worships the tress and go WOO WOO WOO WOO with your dirty @ss mouth

You called Jesus a dumb redskin. And to you redskins are Kykes. That makes Jesus a dumb redskin kyke.
Franklin is a Jewish name which makes you a self loathing Jew. Another Christ killer busted!
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 8:24:45 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
People today think it's no big deal that the bible pointed to Africa as the source of all humans on earth, But that is because they grew up with the out of Africa idea. But before science confirmed it, The out of Africa theory was novel and scary. And the racists fought against it mightily.
Harikrish presents his research on Out of Africa Theory and explains how the African migration began. It began with the African slave trade.

The out of Africa theory was popular when some of the oldest fossils were found in Africa. But Africa was the only place they were looking for fossils. But now they are finding older fossils in China, The Middle East and Asia that challenge the old out of Africa Theory.
The only out of Africa theory that has support is the flow of African slaves out of Africa to Arab countries for 1, 300 years and then to the Americas and Europe for another 4 centuries. The migration of slaves were coerced and not voluntary.

The fossil that rewrites human history: 260, 000-year-old Chinese skull suggests we descend from ASIAN as well as African ancestors
Now we are finally able to separate the dumb ones that stayed in Africa from the smart ones that left Asia.

Try accounting for the dark skin and negroid appearance only found among Africans. Then there is the genetically discovered low IQ among Africans. Now top that with the subhuman species Homo Naledi that is traced to negroid ancestors. Africans have no record of sea faring skills, No written script, No navigational concepts. They were simply hunters living in a jungle culture. Africa was lush with wild life and vegetation. The only reason there was any out of Africa migration was the Arab slave trade and later the European slave trade.
Europeans came up with the Neanderthals to explain their lineage. Asians have their own parallel evolution. Asians even ate the brain of monkeys which was later proven to be European and African common ancestors according to Darwin in his The descent of Man.
We are not related brother.

No one is buying the out of Africa theory today. Africans living in Africa haven't changed much. And those living out of Africa have the highest school drop out rates, 30% of Africans are in prison, 30% of Africans are inemployed. The rest are either drug dealers or pimps with some exceptions. All this proves Africans are genetically different with lower IQ than non Africans and their dark skin and negroid appearance can be traced back to subhuman species now established as African ancestors.
Even interracial marriages cannot wean out the negroid because negroid genes are dominant genes. It puts back the jungle instincts in every negroid generation.

I just proved to you the African race has not evolved. They are basically where they were when they started out. Low IQ, Jungle culture. Whereas all other races evolved and show little resemblance to dark skinned negroid appearance of subhuman species.
These links were artificially established to explain the evolution of race. But it was an over simplistic view.

We don't see a similar pattern of migration with animals and many are region specific.
There is even an out of Australia theory and an out of Israel theory. The fact the rest of the world didn't turn out like Africans makes it obvious we did not all start out as Africans.

If you take the Genesis account. The garden of Eden was not in Africa. The Jews being the diect descendants of Adam and Eve were not Africans. In fact Christians trace the lineage of Africans to Ham.

The First Race: Out-of-*Australia, Not Africa!
http://nationalunitygovernment. Org/content/first-race-out-australia-not-africa-0

Take it from the experts. The only Africans out of Africa were slaves. Their negroid appearance and dark skin was unknown to the free world.
After scientists discovered Africans had lower IQ than non Africans. The out of Africa theory lost credibility because dumb people are only found in Africa. Ancient civilizations were far more advanced than even modern Africa today. Nothing good ever came out of Africa.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 10:02:54 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
With the curse of Ham being associated with incest, And a certain demon also closely tied to it, Has made me wonder if demons have "stations" the way Angels do.

It was noticed early on that the angel Gabriel was usually the one who brought messages from God to men, And the angel Michael is called the archangel, Apparently the "head" angel. He is said to be the one who fought Satan when Satan tried to take Heaven by force of violence.

And then there are angels who cover God with their wings, Sort of like PA's. Some angels are cherubim and some are Seraphim.

Could demons have stations too? Because it looks like Krishna is closely associated with incest, Which is why the Vidas are filled with his exploits of incest.

In the OT, We see that certain "gods" of the non-israelites around the sanai were associated with things like human sacrifice, War, And idolatry.

If this is the case, Then I'm sure there are demons for things racism, Lies, And shame.

And just like the man possessed with demons in the story in my previous post, Demons seem to be attracted to Jesus.

So it stands to reason if a demon suspects Jesus in you, He will be attracted to you. That explanation tells us why there are so many atheists and false prophets on religion boards.

It isn't difficult to believe that demons are behind the rash of gun violence in America, Or the epidemic of child rape in India, Or the phenomena of Islamic jihad.

And none of these things are new. And look closely at history, And you will see the foot prints of the demon long before any symptoms show.

The demons of pedophelia and homosexuality have obviously attacked the catholic church.

But try as I might, I cannot find another country so tied to a single religion. Hindus worship their demon. Muslims do not worship the demon of brutality, Though he greatly influences them, And the US does not worship the demon of gun violence, Though he is currently running amuck in America.

But India worships it's demon of incest. That makes India a special case. The demon of incest is not just for incest, He is apparently for India too.

The curse of Ham fell on Indians, And the curse made them servants to their brothers, Their family, The same people violated in incest.

It was as if God was saying, You violate your brother, And I will make you a servant of your brother.

The entire country of India needs an exorcism from the demon krishna, Or the curse will never be lifted. India today has more slaves than the entire population of the US. Just slaves. Today in 2019! That can be nothing other than a curse.

But old habits die hard. Many Hindus are reluctant to accept that Krishna has harmed them and kept them down. Even those Hindus that know the caste system is pure evil, Or that the devidasi system is vile evil, Seem reluctant to be rid of that filth.

So was the curse on India good or bad?

It was bad for Indians, But good for the world because it kept Indians inside of India where they could not export their sickness to the rest of the world.

Without the curse India might have had a history like that of Rome, And today the entire world could be suffering under the caste system, People being killed for cows, And women treated like chattel.

God always knows what he's doing.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 10:24:06 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
With the curse of Ham being associated with incest, And a certain demon also closely tied to it, Has made me wonder if demons have "stations" the way Angels do.

It was noticed early on that the angel Gabriel was usually the one who brought messages from God to men, And the angel Michael is called the archangel, Apparently the "head" angel. He is said to be the one who fought Satan when Satan tried to take Heaven by force of violence.

And then there are angels who cover God with their wings, Sort of like PA's. Some angels are cherubim and some are Seraphim.

Could demons have stations too? Because it looks like Krishna is closely associated with incest, Which is why the Vidas are filled with his exploits of incest.

In the OT, We see that certain "gods" of the non-israelites around the sanai were associated with things like human sacrifice, War, And idolatry.

If this is the case, Then I'm sure there are demons for things racism, Lies, And shame.

And just like the man possessed with demons in the story in my previous post, Demons seem to be attracted to Jesus.

So it stands to reason if a demon suspects Jesus in you, He will be attracted to you. That explanation tells us why there are so many atheists and false prophets on religion boards.

It isn't difficult to believe that demons are behind the rash of gun violence in America, Or the epidemic of child rape in India, Or the phenomena of Islamic jihad.

And none of these things are new. And look closely at history, And you will see the foot prints of the demon long before any symptoms show.

The demons of pedophelia and homosexuality have obviously attacked the catholic church.

But try as I might, I cannot find another country so tied to a single religion. Hindus worship their demon. Muslims do not worship the demon of brutality, Though he greatly influences them, And the US does not worship the demon of gun violence, Though he is currently running amuck in America.

But India worships it's demon of incest. That makes India a special case. The demon of incest is not just for incest, He is apparently for India too.

The curse of Ham fell on Indians, And the curse made them servants to their brothers, Their family, The same people violated in incest.

It was as if God was saying, You violate your brother, And I will make you a servant of your brother.

The entire country of India needs an exorcism from the demon krishna, Or the curse will never be lifted. India today has more slaves than the entire population of the US. Just slaves. Today in 2019! That can be nothing other than a curse.

But old habits die hard. Many Hindus are reluctant to accept that Krishna has harmed them and kept them down. Even those Hindus that know the caste system is pure evil, Or that the devidasi system is vile evil, Seem reluctant to be rid of that filth.

So was the curse on India good or bad?

It was bad for Indians, But good for the world because it kept Indians inside of India where they could not export their sickness to the rest of the world.

Without the curse India might have had a history like that of Rome, And today the entire world could be suffering under the caste system, People being killed for cows, And women treated like chattel.

God always knows what he's doing.

You are distorting the bible to make Krishna the Christian God. Wow!
Why is it bad for Indian when 2 billion Christians are following Krishna. Wow!
You even distorted the start of nations in Genesis 10.

I maintain that the curse of Canaan is fulfilled in the slavery of India.
Indians are the descendants of Japheth, Nigger Ethang.
- Arabs are the descendants of Japheth.
Arabs are the descendants of Shem, Nigger Ethang.
- The British are the descendants of Shem.
The British are the descendants of Japheth, Nigger Ethang.

Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 10:52:11 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:

The intent of this paper is to prove that,

1. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the sin of incest.
2. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the religion of Hinduism.
3. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the people of India.

Curses

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.

Indians - Yes
Bible.

So let us summerize. . .

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.

Indians - Yes

D. Japth shall dwell in the tents of Shem. . . Who dwelled in the tents of Shem?
Indians - No

E. Cursed be Canaan. . .
For 17 centuries, ALL Indians were slaves. The curse better fits the group that suffered complete slavery.
Indians - Yes

The curse was not to all of Ham's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But because of Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery, But for 17 centuries, All Indians, Every one of them, Were slaves or the slaves of slaves. Just as the bible prophesies.

Note also that as all Hindus were Indian, Hinduism is the only one of the major religions where every believer in the religion was a slave.

The only people 100% covered by the curse are Indians
The only religion 100% covered by the curse is Hinduism.

In writing this paper I showed it to an Indian Hindu and the last two points shocked him. He had never thought of it that way.

Hinduism is the only religion on earth where every single one of its believers was a slave. As if Hinduism itself was a curse.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 11:22:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
ethang5 wrote:

The intent of this paper is to prove that,

1. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the sin of incest.
2. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the religion of Hinduism.
3. The curse of Ham laid out in the Noah story was actually a curse on the people of India.

Curses

1. A servant of servants shall he be unto his brothers

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.

Indians - Yes
Bible.

So let us summerize. . .

A. India's untouchables were servants to the other Indians who were themselves servants to the Arabs and British.
Servants of servants?
Indians - Yes

B. Enslaved by both brothers Shem(British) & Japheth(Arabs)
Enslaved by descendants of Shem AND Japheth
Indians - Yes

C. Canaan shall be his [Japheth's] servant
Institutionally enslaved by Arabs.

Indians - Yes

D. Japth shall dwell in the tents of Shem. . . Who dwelled in the tents of Shem?
Indians - No

E. Cursed be Canaan. . .
For 17 centuries, ALL Indians were slaves. The curse better fits the group that suffered complete slavery.
Indians - Yes

The curse was not to all of Ham's descendants, But went through Ham, To Canaan, To Cush, To Seba. Seba is the one on which the curse rested, And it was not because of Noah's nakedness, But because of Seba's idolatry with Krishna.

God's curses do not fail. Less than 30% of Africans ever saw slavery, But for 17 centuries, All Indians, Every one of them, Were slaves or the slaves of slaves. Just as the bible prophesies.

Note also that as all Hindus were Indian, Hinduism is the only one of the major religions where every believer in the religion was a slave.

The only people 100% covered by the curse are Indians
The only religion 100% covered by the curse is Hinduism.

In writing this paper I showed it to an Indian Hindu and the last two points shocked him. He had never thought of it that way.

Hinduism is the only religion on earth where every single one of its believers was a slave. As if Hinduism itself was a curse.

You forgot to mention the children of Ham. They all came from African countries. Wow!

Noah had 3 sons Shem, Japheth and Ham. Noah only cursed Ham and his children and Ham's children were destined to be slaves to Shem and Japheth and their descendants. (Genesis 9)

Genesis 10 gives us the start of Nations.
Only Ham's children were the first Africans.
1. 4. Four Sons of Ham
1. Mizraim (Egypt)
2. Cush (Sudan, Ethiopia)
3. Put (Lybia)
4. Canaan (Land of Canaanites)
The word Cush means black. Biblically, Cush is the son of Ham. He is considered the ancestor of the dark-skinned people that occupied Ethiopia. His name is often associated with Ethiopia.

As you can see those are African countries. Both the curse and hot sun changed the genetics of Hams descendant. This gave rise to the African race and phenotypes.

Noah's sons Shem and Japheth started the other nations.

2. Five Sons of Shem (see map below):
1. Elam (Arabia)
2. Asshur (Assyria)
3. Lud (Lydians)
4. Aram (Aramaic, Armenia, Mesopotamia, Syria)
5. Arphaxad (From which Abraham descended)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Shem or his descendants were never in Africa.

3. Seven Sons of Japheth:
1. Javan (Greece, Romans, Romance -- French, Italians, Spanish, Portuguese)
2. Magog (Scythians, Slavs, Russians, Bulgarians, Bohemians, Poles, Slovaks, Croatians)
3. Madai (Indians & Iranic: Medes, Persians, Afghans, Kurds)
4. Tubal (South of Black Sea)
5. Tiras (Thracians, Teutons, Germans, Scandinavian, Anglo-Saxon, Jutes)
6. Meshech (Russia)
7. Gomer (Celtic)
Note, This debunks the Out of Africa Theory. Japheth or his descendants were never in Africa.

Now you know why the curse of Ham only condemned Africans who were the descendants of Hams children who built the African nations.
Noah's curse and its fulfillment is found in African slavery.
The bible covers the history of the Middle East and African countries.
Egypt, Babylon, The Levant. Canaanites, Israelites. Africans.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/28/2019 11:50:46 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
I have noticed that one common factor in human behavior when men are demon oppressed is extremism.

Take the jihadists, They are willing to kill themselves. The men surrounding Lots house were rabid. Or look at old video of racists, They were consumed by it to the point of incoherence.

The story of Jesus' trail shows how the crowd simply kept repeating the same thing over and over though Pilate insisted he had found no fault in Jesus.

Now consider India, The country is rife with extremism. Hindu nationalists, Cow vigilantes, Muslim extremists, Several dissident groups, Rapists, Political criminals and scammers, All willing to kill and be killed for their extreme beliefs.

In my next few posts I will look at other instances in history where extremism gripped a nation, And decide whether if it was demon oppression and what was done to relieve the people of that burden.

And though I'm just starting, I'm willing to bet Krishna will not be far behind in any cases we do find.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2019 1:12:50 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
I have noticed that one common factor in human behavior when men are demon oppressed is extremism.

Take the jihadists, They are willing to kill themselves. The men surrounding Lots house were rabid. Or look at old video of racists, They were consumed by it to the point of incoherence.

The story of Jesus' trail shows how the crowd simply kept repeating the same thing over and over though Pilate insisted he had found no fault in Jesus.

Now consider India, The country is rife with extremism. Hindu nationalists, Cow vigilantes, Muslim extremists, Several dissident groups, Rapists, Political criminals and scammers, All willing to kill and be killed for their extreme beliefs.

In my next few posts I will look at other instances in history where extremism gripped a nation, And decide whether if it was demon oppression and what was done to relieve the people of that burden.

And though I'm just starting, I'm willing to bet Krishna will not be far behind in any cases we do find.

The Boko Haram are in Africa. 80% of Africans are Christians the religion that condemned Africans to slavery.
Your own 3 daughters are illegitimate bastards by your own confession.

Ethang5 wrote: So it causes me no consternation. As long as Jesus remains on His throne, And I remain His personal property, There is no problem I cannot face.
Ethang confesses he is a chattel slave in Africa and his children are illegitimate bastards.
#29, #38 Harikrish is soundly beaten:
https://www. Debate. Org/forums/religion/topic/4341719/
That would make Ethang a chattel slave.
Now for Ethang's 3 illegitimate children that he kept a secret which Harikrish also exposes along with Ethang's other confessions.

Ethang5 wrote: Jesus does not sell His slaves, We are His forever. My kids are owned by Jesus also. After all, He created them.

So you had nothing to do with your childrens birth. Wow! Another case of virgin birth.
See how the nigger lies. Busted again nigger.

Nigger you are a liar and a lunatic to claim Jesus created your children. Now Christians like you are claiming Jesus is into creating babies. Just like God created Jesus by gang raping Virgin Mary to conceive Jesus an illegitimate Jewish bastard. You are claiming your 3 children are illegitimate bastards because Jesus had a hand in creating them while you like Joseph stood idly by.
Ethang wrote: I have 3 daughters. When I tell them to listen to me, It isn't ego. I require them to obey me, It isn't ego. (It's incest, Nigger).

Now we have the connection between Ethang's confession and slavery and his 3 illegitimate bastard children.

Ethang said:
How could I modify links in YOUR posts? I'm just a poor African slave remember?
Post #186 Harikrish for Christian champion:
https://www. Debate. Org/forums/religion/topic/78923p/7/

Ethang5 wrote: We agree here, But for some reason, You keep repeating on what we agree. Yes, I am not proud to be African. I cannot be proud to be African.

The connection: Ethang is not proud to be African because he is just a poor African slave. OK we get it! Now we get why Ethang is obsessed with incest. He confessed he has 3 illegitimate bastard children his daughters. Yikes!

Why isn't Krishna is your life?

Why are you smuggling bibles when 50% of your people are illiterate?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where the literacy rate is below 50%,

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where I run Bibles to countries which outlaw the possession of Bibles. Been doing it for more than 15 years to many countries. I have 3 children. (Pimping children are also illegal, Nigger)

How would you translate these contradictory Christian behaviour, Nigger?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Are you saying incest is not only biblical, It is also customary in Ghana where you live?

Ethang5 wrote: I live in Africa where slavery is still practiced today.

Ethang5 wrote: I have studied the entire Bible for almost 50 years and have not yet found a single contradiction or falsehood in it.

You just confirmed incest is very much in the Bible. You even posted bible verses which mention God Krishna.
So biblical stories of rape, Incest, Sodomy, Slavery and genocide are not contradictions to Ethang. Why would it be a contradiction to Ethang if he engaged in these not so controversial perversions like rape, Incest and beastility.


You are one very sick low IQ nigger slave, Ethang. But you found Krishna in the Bible which you now use to justify incest because Krishna is now biblical.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2019 6:59:06 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
While I'm researching it, A few thoughts about incest.

First, Many of you may not know exactly what incest is, So let's get a formal definition.

Incest is human sexual activity between family members or close relatives. This typically includes sexual activity between people in consanguinity (blood relations), And sometimes those related by affinity (marriage or stepfamily), Adoption, Clan, Or lineage.

A common justification for prohibiting incest is avoiding inbreeding: a collection of genetic disorders suffered by the children of parents with a close genetic relationship. Such children are at greater risk for congenital disorders, Death, And developmental and physical disability, And that risk is proportional to their parents' coefficient of relationship - a measure of how closely the parents are related genetically.

Most modern societies have laws regarding incest or social restrictions on closely consanguineous marriages, But some primitive societies still exist that have no law against incest.

In a 1999 news story, BBC reported, "Close-knit family life in India masks an alarming amount of sexual abuse of children and teenage girls by family members, A new report suggests.

Delhi organisation RAHI said 76% of respondents to its survey had been abused when they were children"40% of those by a family member.

RAHI founder Anjua Gupta said she set up the organisation because she believed sexual abuse was rampant in Indian families and no one was doing anything about it.

"When I started working in this area people used to say 'Where are the Indian statistics? '. It was thought of as a Western phenomenon.

"One of the reasons there hasn't been any data collection is because it is not considered to be an Indian problem. "

The report, Voices from the Silent Zone, Suggests that nearly three-quarters of upper and middle class Indian women are abused by a family member - more than often an uncle, A cousin or an elder brother.

Psychiatrist Achal Baghat says the particular problem in India is that the concept of family is almost sacred, And abuse, If it happens, Is met with disbelief.

"I think there is a great myth about Indian family systems being supportive, " he says.

"What do you do if you're the mother in a family where the child is being abused? You do not have that much power to do anything about the abuse.

"Generally there is this thing about harming the name of the family. This need to prevent the family being laughed at leads to a lot of cover-ups. "

In India, There is no specific law covering sexual abuse of children by strangers, Let alone by family members. The legal definition of rape calls for proof that the rapist actually penetrated a victim, Even a young child.

Judges have even said that it is impossible for fathers to rape their daughters, Despite evidence to the contrary.

In the end, All Indian counsellors and activists can do to help victims of abuse is convince them that nothing has been their fault; that they are a survivor of a damaging, But not necessarily fatal experience, And they can continue to live life - never forgetting what happened to them, But getting on with it.

Everyone who works with victims and survivors of abuse agrees that awareness begins in the schoolyard. But in a profoundly conservative society like India, Raising such sensitive issues in school would be controversial.

The chances that more than half of India's schoolgirls have experienced or will experience sexual abuse remain very high.

It is clear then that when it comes to incest, India is unique among nations. This paper asserts this is due to the old curse placed on the ancestors of Indians.

The curse is actually on hinduism, But since virtually all Hindus are Indian, Conflation is common.

The solution then, Is to rid India of Hinduism. Hinduism is the virus that carries the curse.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2019 2:24:28 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
While I'm researching it, A few thoughts about incest.

First, Many of you may not know exactly what incest is, So let's get a formal definition.

Incest is human sexual activity between family members or close relatives. This typically includes sexual activity between people in consanguinity (blood relations), And sometimes those related by affinity (marriage or stepfamily), Adoption, Clan, Or lineage.

You have been obsessed with incest from tbe beginning. But the reasons are clearer now.
Ethang was asked to e plain his interest in incest. We now have his answer.

Help us understand why Ethang is obsessed with Krishna. He heard Krishna and a few other Hindu deities were heavily engaging in incest. Now why would Ethang a Christian father of three daughters search for stories of incest in other religions? At first I assumed he was doing the research on incest to attack Hinduism. Then I came across several, Of Ethang's past post where he spoke of his three daughters. It is an unnatural perversion for a father (Ethang) to talk about his daughters and his obsession with incest on a public forum, Just like I found it disturbing that Tradesecret would brag his mother smuggles bibles in China. Smuggling bibles is illegal in China and the penalty is often death and here was Tradesecret oblivious to the danger he was exposing his mother to by speaking so loosely about her illegal activities.
You want dumb Christians we have two right here.

But it is blasphemous for Christians to talk about other Gods because it gives these Gods legitimacy.
EXODUS 20:3 KJV "Thou shalt have no other gods before me. "
Exodus 34:14 For you must not worship any other god, For the LORD, Whose name is Jealous, Is a jealous God.

The black nigger Christian slave Ethang5 is promoting Hinduism, He is obsessing about Krishna and his incestuous stories. Wow!

Ethang wrote: There is one instance with Abraham where he, Out of fear, Listed his wife as his sister. That may be another attempt by the incest God Krishna to waylay Abraham.

Ethang5 wrote: Krishna was the "god" of Ham. The "god" of Sodom and Gomorrah, The "god" of Lot's daughters, The "god" of Seba, And is the "god" of Indians. The same demon. The very one you worship.

The Nigger Ethang5 is confused. Krishna is a mythical Hindu deity who had nothing to do with the bible. It was Noah's curse of Ham that condemned Ham's children (Africans) to slavery.
Krishna never had sex with humans. Krishna was a mythical Hindu deity. But the Bible is full of incest and sexual perversions.

The nigger Ethang has been smuggling bibles for over 15 years which teaches black slavery, Rape, Incest, Genocide, Human sacrifice, Cannibalism and worship of a Jewish corpse Jesus nailed to a wooden cross for his deluded blasphemous lies and lunacy 2000 years ago.

Genesis 6:1 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, And they married any of them they chose. 3 Then the Lord said, "My Spirit will not contend with[a] humans forever, For they are mortal[b]; their days will be a hundred and twenty years. "

Mary was gang raped by God and the Holy Spirit.
Luke 1:35 The angel answered, "The Holy Spirit will come on you, And the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called[b] the Son of God.

There are several clear cases of incest in the Old Testament. Lot, Abraham"s nephew, Begat two sons by his own daughters while in a drunken stupor (Genesis 19:30-35). Moses recorded the sordid act as a matter of history, But there is no sanction of the sin in the sacred text. In fact it is placed in a decidedly negative light. Ruben was intimate with Bilhah, His father"s concubine (Genesis 35:22) " a shameful act that was condemned and penalized (Genesis 49:4). Amnon, One of David"s sons, Committed incest/rape against his half-sister, Tamar (2 Samuel 13:7-14), And, As a consequence, Was murdered later by the order of Absalom, Tamar"s full brother (2 Samuel 13).

Anyone can see why turning Ethang away from stories of incest in mythological Hindu text would have had little effect because the bibles he has been smuggling for over 15 years provides him unlimited access to these incestuous stories.

One might even want to know if his perverted perversions were the reason he studied the bible for 50 years.
Ethang5 wrote: I have studied the entire Bible for almost 50 years and have not yet found a single contradiction or falsehood in it.

So biblical stories of rape, Incest, Sodomy, Slavery and genocide are not contradictions to Ethang. Why would it be a contradiction to Ethang if he engaged in these not so controversial perversions?

Ethang5 wrote: I have 3 daughters. When I tell them to listen to me, It isn't ego. I require them to obey me, It isn't ego.
It is incest!

That suggests your total control over your daughters. Control and an obsession with incest is a dangerous combination. To go as far as Hindu incest mythologies to justifying his indulgence suggests the nigger Ethang suffers from guilt.

How would you translate these contradictory Christian behaviour, Nigger?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

But you did go to jail. Your house was a prison and your cell mates prisoners.
Ethang5 wrote: I have an electrified fence at my house. I had it put in.
I work with prisoners. Many say they are Christian because the think it will facilitate their case with the parole board.

Are you saying incest is not only biblical, It is also customary in Ghana where you live?

Harikrish biblical scholar and spiritual leader.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2019 5:54:10 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
All demons, Being minions of Satan, Share his goal of destroying the family unit. The three main tools Satan uses to attack the family, Are adultery, Divorce, And incest.

Adultery is bringing a blade between the marriage and the outside world, Divorce is bringing a blade between the husband and the wife, And incest is bringing a blade between the parents and the children.

Of the threes ways, Incest is the sin that seeds new families to perpetuate the problem. In that way, It is worse than adultery or divorce.

The only tool of Satan worse for families than incest is war, As war simply eliminates the father instantly. But war is difficult for demons to start, And they tend to be localized by countries.

Incest can be anywhere in the world and works in the secret of the family unit.

What I find intriguing is that a curse was placed on an entire religion. But there is precedent. For example, Commandment 6 of the 10 commandments says, "Honor thy parents that thy days upon the Earth may be long. "

The sin of parental disrespect caries with it a curse of a short life. So there is no reason why the sin of incest, Embodied in Hinduism, Could not likewise carry the curse of slavery.

And for years and years, Satan masked the curse on incest by using the cover of racism. Tricking many into believing that the curse was on Africans instead of on Hinduism.

Today with better scientific and historical methods, We know which group of people better fit the curse, And we can see that they are still suffering under the curse today, Thousands of years later.
Harikrish
Posts: 29,658
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/29/2019 7:22:35 PM
Posted: 2 years ago
ethang5 wrote:
All demons, Being minions of Satan, Share his goal of destroying the family unit. The three main tools Satan uses to attack the family, Are adultery, Divorce, And incest.

Adultery is bringing a blade between the marriage and the outside world, Divorce is bringing a blade between the husband and the wife, And incest is bringing a blade between the parents and the children.

Of the threes ways, Incest is the sin that seeds new families to perpetuate the problem. In that way, It is worse than adultery or divorce.

The only tool of Satan worse for families than incest is war, As war simply eliminates the father instantly. But war is difficult for demons to start, And they tend to be localized by countries.

Incest can be anywhere in the world and works in the secret of the family unit.

What I find intriguing is that a curse was placed on an entire religion. But there is precedent. For example, Commandment 6 of the 10 commandments says, "Honor thy parents that thy days upon the Earth may be long. "

The sin of parental disrespect caries with it a curse of a short life. So there is no reason why the sin of incest, Embodied in Hinduism, Could not likewise carry the curse of slavery.

And for years and years, Satan masked the curse on incest by using the cover of racism. Tricking many into believing that the curse was on Africans instead of on Hinduism.

Today with better scientific and historical methods, We know which group of people better fit the curse, And we can see that they are still suffering under the curse today, Thousands of years later.

80% of Africans are Christians.

Incest is a real problem in SA, Say experts
SOUTH AFRICA / 4 AUGUST 2000, 7:25PM / MELANIE PETERS
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInTell a FriendShare via WhatsApp
The case of alleged family incest in Mpumalanga, Which has shocked South Africa, Is not an isolated case, With authorities warning that incest occurs countrywide.

A Durban teenager has to live with the humiliation of his cousin walking in on him while his own father was masturbating him.

In another Durban case, A 20-year-old woman has pressed charges of indecent assault against her father. The alleged acts included oral sex and the insertion of his fingers into her vagina. The acts of incest took place from when she was six until she was 16.

"Incest is a real problem, " said Childline Director Joan van Niekerk. "While there are many cases of father-and-daughter incest, We are also seeing a lot of father-and-son, And older-brother-and-younger-sister sexual interaction. "

"Father-son sexual interaction happens more frequently than people would like to believe. It leaves the child with a distortion of his own identity and sexuality. They grow up thinking they are gay, " she said.

According to police statistics, About 15 000 South African children under the age of 18 were raped last year. This year, Childline has already referred 600 KwaZulu-Natal children for therapy after they were sexually assaulted.

Authorities warn that 50 percent of all cases of rape and sexual assault on children under the age of 18 are committed within the immediate family.


You had nothing to do with your 3 daughters birth because according to your confession Jesus created them, They were his slaves, He owns them. So to you they are your 3 illegitimate bastard daughters.

Ethang5 wrote: Jesus does not sell His slaves, We are His forever. My kids are owned by Jesus also. After all, He created them.

So you had nothing to do with your childrens birth. Wow! Another case of virgin birth.
See how the nigger lies. Busted again nigger.

Ethang5 wrote: I have 3 daughters. When I tell them to listen to me, It isn't ego. I require them to obey me, It isn't ego.
It is incest!

That suggests your total control over your daughters. Control and an obsession with incest is a dangerous combination. To go as far as Hindu incest mythologies to justify his indulgence suggests the nigger Ethang suffers from guilt.

How would you translate these contradictory Christian behaviour, Nigger?
Ethang5 wrote: I live in Ghana, Some of what is custom here would be child abuse in America, Yet the Ghanaian parents aren't in jail.

Are you saying incest is not only biblical, It is also customary in Ghana where you live?

What does Lord Krishna have to do with African incest when 80% of Africans are Christians?

Now you are saying Africans like you see Lord Krishna in the Bible.
But it is blasphemous for Christians to talk about other Gods because it gives these Gods legitimacy.
EXODUS 20:3 KJV "Thou shalt have no other gods before me. "
Exodus 34:14 For you must not worship any other god, For the LORD, Whose name is Jealous, Is a jealous God.

The black nigger Christian slave Ethang5 is promoting Hinduism, He is obsessing about Krishna and his incestuous stories. Wow!

Ethang wrote: There is one instance with Abraham where he, Out of fear, Listed his wife as his sister. That may be another attempt by the incest God Krishna to waylay Abraham.

Ethang5 wrote: Krishna was the "god" of Ham. The "god" of Sodom and Gomorrah, The "god" of Lot's daughters, The "god" of Seba, And is the "god" of Indians. The same demon. The very one you worship.
ethang5
Posts: 19,110
Add as Friend
Challenge to a Debate
Send a Message
6/30/2019 10:25:17 AM
Posted: 2 years ago
Now we can perform a test.

If incest is cursed, Then those engaging in incest should incur the penalty of the curse right?

The Colts Case
In some ways the Colts were like any other family. They lived on farms where the children loved playing together in the dirt and riding on quad bikes.

But as shocked police and welfare workers would eventually uncover, The uncle was sleeping with his sister and may have fathered some of her inbred children.

DNA tests would prove that least eleven of the children had been fathered by a relative of their mother, And the interrelated children themselves were allegedly involved in rampant sexual activity.

The farm was a squalid camp and the children were malformed and devoid of hygiene.

It"s the most bizarre and depraved of family histories, The tragic tale of the Colt incest family whose members are now in prison facing charges.

For at least five generations their secret life of inbred sexual relations between brothers and sisters, Uncles and nieces and fathers and daughters went unchecked.

Prison, Analogous of slavery, Is what befell these morons. Just as the curse dictates.

The Swendon Case
The 51-year-old, Who cannot be named for legal reasons, Started indecently assaulting his daughter when she was eight and later began raping her, Swindon Crown Court heard.

Swindon Advertiser - A man who got his schoolgirl sister pregnant in the early 1980s has evaded prison.

Incest father of six jailed. . . She was eight and later began raping her, Swindon Crown Court heard. . .

He admitted two counts of incest between the start of 1981. . . Michael Butt, Prosecuting, Told Swindon crown court that. . .

Fathers in Britain free to rape their own children | - TapNewsWire
This is why we have the Sheffield and Swindon incest cases. . .

Why are there so many incest cases in Swindon?

For decades the Hindu community has been one of the largest yet most unrepresented in Swindon" until now.

More than 60 years since the first post-war Indian migrants settled in the town, Hindus are finally celebrating the long-awaited inauguration of a temple and cultural centre" a major step towards integration and validation in Swindon.

The centre, Which opened its doors at Cheney Manor Industrial Estate at the end of May, Is the work of chairman Pradeep Bhardwaj and his dogged band of volunteers.

Can you connect the dots? Incest is rife in India, Indians migrate to Swindon in large numbers, Swindon gets incest statistics like India.

The name Swindon is derived from the Saxon words swine dun meaning pig hill or the hill where pigs were bred.

Remember the story of the man possessed with many demons that were banished into a herd of pigs on a hill? Do you see the prints of Krishna?

Men with uncontrollable sexual urges are called pigs. Krishna looks like a pig in old depictions of him in vedic literature. Is it any wonder incest is associated with this demon?


So will the curse affect Swindon? Just wait and see.

Nearly A Third Of People In Swindon Have Drugs And Alcohol problems. . .
There are around 2, 400 people in Swindon addicted to drugs with as many as 40, 000 people estimated to have alcohol issues, . . .

They left India and came to Swindon, And as soon as they started with that vile Hinduism, The curse reactivated.

Slave to drugs anyone?

By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.