God Or Atheism?

Evidence of absence makes it so there is evidence for atheism. Theism has no evidence.

Theist vs. Atheist

Who should the 'Burden of Proof' fall on? Theism or Atheism?

Atheism is a "not belief", there is nothing to prove. Theism is a belief in something. If I say I have an invisible unicorn in my yard, I can't tell people that do not believe it is there to prove it isn't. I would have to prove it. Same with the belief in magic sky daddy, more commonly known as god. Theists have to prove he exists.

What belief system do you hate the most?

Brainwashing little kids into believing they will be tortured if they don't believe in what an ancient book that denies science says? What is there to love about this system!

Do you believe in Evolution or Creationism?

Which is more scientific: Evolution or Creationism?

Evolution vs. Creationism: What do you believe?

Scientific evidence vs ancient book with many inconsistencies... What do you think?

Creationism vs. Evolution

Microevolution and Macroevolution are the same thing, the only "difference" is time. Fossil records also show evolution.

Should schools teach creationism or evolution?

Which makes more sense?

Evidence of absence shows that there is no God(s). True that there could be a deistic God(s), but then there is no religion, they could have no influence on the creation of the universe, and might even not know we exist. If it is a choice of a deistic God or no God, No God would be the better way to go. It is impossible to know what a deistic God wants, what his/her/its view is. In order to advance we would have to act as if there was no God, so atheism makes more sense.