![]() |
thett3's Debates
![]() ![]() |
Drug Legalization


Many thanks in advance to thett3 for accepting this debate.Resolved: The sale, manufacture and consumption of all drugs should be legalized in the United States.Upon acceptance, I will begin the discussion in Round 2. ...
Debate: Churches ought to pay taxes


Full resolution: Churches ought to pay taxesThe debate is impossible to accept, apply in the comments if you are interested and I will send the challenge to the applicant of my choosing. First round is acceptance only. No new arguments in the final round. Kritiks aren't allowed. Taxes on churches would mean regular property taxes and commercial income taxes. Basically they lose their tax exempt status....
Autumn Regular Tournament: In a democracy, voting ought to be compulsory


This debate can only be accepted by thett3, if you are not thett3 and manage to accept this debate, then you concede the debate entirely. This debate is the second round debate between myself and thett3, in the DDO Autumn Regular Tournament.The full resolution is:'In a democracy, voting ought to be compulsory for whomever is eligible to vote in that democracy.'DefinitionsDemocracy
On balance, jury nullification in the United States is just


This debate is for the Autumn tournament, round one. Resolved: On balance, jury nullification in the United States is just. Some definitions: Jury nullification is defined as the practice of a jury nullifying a law by returning a verdict of not guilty even though they believe that the defendant is guilty because they believe the law to be unjust. On balance: with all facts considered. I will define justice as giving each their due. What exactly is meant by "just" may be a point...
On Balance, the British Conquest of Native American Lands was Justified


Thett3 has been wanting to debate me on this, so am happy to say I am challenging her on this topic.This debate encompasses the time period of 1620 and onward of British/American conquest of what is now the mainland United States.
Who will I vote for?


Rules: My opponent states the name of someone who is running for DDO president in the first round. I must vote for that person and then in my second round I must post a link to where I voted for that person. If I successfully do this, or my opponent doesn't post someone for me to vote for in round 1, then I win. Otherwise my opponent wins....
The world is a better place because of Christianity


Christianity has been the inspiration for many great things throughout the ages. It has also been the cause of some of the worst tragedies in history. This debate is not about the existence of the Christian God, but if the Christian religion is a positive influence on the world. I will make the point that the bad influences of Christianity far outweigh the good. I challenge an opponent to show me the error in my thoughts on this....
Debate.org should maintain it's policy of deletion


Thanks in advance to my opponent for accepting. In the forums, my opponent has contended very strongly that DDO should implement a policy he terms "Free debates" where no debates or threads are deleted. I invite him to defend this proposition. Since my opponent is the one advocating a change in the status quo but I'm the affirmative, the burden of proof will be shared. What a shared burden of proof means is that rather than the judge defaulting to one side, both sides are obliga...
In The United States, Jury Nullification Is A Just Check On Government


Lincoln-Douglas style debate. First round is for acceptance only. I look forward to this debate!...
Presdiential debate


The 2016 elections are upon us. Both Hilary Clinton and Rand Paul have stepped down in light of two new candidates. I will be taking a conservative position so it is suggested that someone on the left take this position. Each round will be as so 2. Economics 3. Foreign policy 4. Domestic issues 5. Environment...